mersenneforum.org OFFICIAL "SERVER PROBLEMS" THREAD
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2019-03-28, 18:10 #1673 ixfd64 Bemusing Prompter     "Danny" Dec 2002 California 2·1,171 Posts The mersenne.info domain expired some time ago. It should be removed from the list of download mirrors.
2019-03-30, 06:14   #1674
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

328310 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ixfd64 The mersenne.info domain expired some time ago. It should be removed from the list of download mirrors.
I was going to fix it but either George or James beat me to it.

 2019-03-30, 12:37 #1675 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 2·32·269 Posts Prime95 PRP DC work preference set, PRP TC received, primenet considers it a PRP first-time Switched an old i3 laptop from P-1 to PRPDC work type in prime95 V29.4b8 recently. It finished its assigned P-1 and was assigned and began a PRPDC. Sort of. Worktodo entry is PRP=(aid redacted),1,2,79335979,-1,75,0,3,1 prime.log says: Code: [Thu Mar 28 03:37:00 2019 - ver 29.4] Getting assignment from server PrimeNet success code with additional info: Server assigned PRP work. Got assignment (aid redacted): PRP M79335979 Sending expected completion date for M79335979: Apr 23 2020 PrimeNet success code with additional info: WARNING: Estimated completion date is more than one year away. The assignment may be reassigned to another user after one year. The system had a low throttle setting for P-1. I've subsequently raised the throttle setting, from 20 to 35, so it should complete in well under a year. Prime95 Test, Status is indicating completion in April 2020, but the worker window estimate is 87 days, on the client. Per https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/, as an exponent above 51828902, it should be a cat4 DC with up to 360 days to complete. (Although, that page mentions LL tests but not PRP for first time test categories, and "LL and DC" but not PRP for category requirements. That page could use a rewrite to fully include PRP or generalize to primality test.) https://www.mersenne.org/workload/ is indicating the assignment as a first time "PRP" test, cat 0, expiration 28 days from now, ETA April 2020, not work type PRP DC or a fitting expiration for that work type. https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...9335979&full=1 shows it's a third PRP check of the exponent, although the first two are of differing PRP residue types 4 and 1, so it's probably a DC for one or the other. But it indicates the current assignment as "PRP test" not "PRP DC". (It would be good if the prime95 worker window title indicated which PRP residue type is being run, and first test or DC, but I don't think even v29.7 would indicate PRP residue type of a run or first vs. DC.) Please check/fix the status of this assignment, and address how primenet seems to be treating a PRP DC/TC as a first PRP test for future assignments. Unless perhaps it's an issue with prime95 v29.4b8 somehow. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-03-30 at 13:04
 2019-03-30, 16:56 #1676 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 2×32×269 Posts Just confirmed by upgrading the instance in the preceding post to v29.7b1 x64 prime95, that it does not indicate DC or residue type in the worker title.
 2019-04-17, 01:19 #1677 erick84mm   "Erick" Apr 2019 Japan 48 Posts Unable to add manual results Sorry to ask for this but I was trying to upload the results from my GPU manual testing and I think I'm unable to do so. Is there any problem with the server?
 2019-04-17, 01:38 #1678 ixfd64 Bemusing Prompter     "Danny" Dec 2002 California 92616 Posts Known issue: manual results are currently disabled because people are jerks.
2019-04-17, 02:00   #1679
ATH
Einyen

Dec 2003
Denmark

31·97 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by erick84mm Sorry to ask for this but I was trying to upload the results from my GPU manual testing and I think I'm unable to do so. Is there any problem with the server?
Manual results are disabled for now, due to idiots turning in fake results. Hold on to your results until it is open again:

https://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=24103

 2019-04-17, 02:52 #1680 wfgarnett3     "William Garnett III" Oct 2002 Bensalem, PA 2·43 Posts That explains why I can't submit my gpu72.com results -- guess I will have to try another day Attached Thumbnails
 2019-04-17, 04:52 #1681 Rodrigo     Jun 2010 Pennsylvania 32·103 Posts I was about to post a screenshot showing my Internet Explorer 8 on XP being unable to report manual results, when I saw ixfd64's post. That's too bad, I was all set to complain about age discrimination at mersenne.org.
 2019-04-17, 05:34 #1682 Prime95 P90 years forever!     Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 2×7×521 Posts Aaron re-enabled the page. Login is now required.
 2019-04-17, 06:41 #1683 tha     Dec 2002 2·3·7·19 Posts The server accepted a lot of results from an anonymous with the same obvious wrong LL residue like http://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/83294507 Can someone check the server and remove all results with this residue?

 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ewmayer Lounge 39 2015-05-19 01:08 ewmayer Science & Technology 41 2014-04-16 11:54 cheesehead Soap Box 56 2013-06-29 01:42 cheesehead Soap Box 61 2013-06-11 04:30 Dubslow Programming 19 2012-05-31 17:49

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:09.

Sat Jan 16 16:09:57 UTC 2021 up 44 days, 12:21, 0 users, load averages: 1.39, 1.43, 1.53

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.