mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-02-20, 20:06   #1
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

118910 Posts
Default

As a low prio project:

79M 79.3M Factoring to 2^59
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-22, 19:16   #2
nitro
 
Feb 2003

2×3×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smh
As a low prio project:

79M 79.3M Factoring to 2^59
I know you're probably on a quicker machine, but I factored M79299719 to 72 bits on a PII-300, took 9 months. The P-1 took one month.

regards
nitro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-23, 01:12   #3
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

276610 Posts
Default

Except that he is only doing it to 2^59 which conceivable makes it atleast 2^13 times faster.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-23, 10:35   #4
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29×41 Posts
Default

For now, i'm only testing numbers that are factored to 2^58, and bring them to the 2^59 level. I might bring them to 2^60 later, or do the 2^59 level for some lower numbers.

Another question.

Do you guys also plan to bring numbers below 2M to a higher level?
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-23, 11:18   #5
tha
 
tha's Avatar
 
Dec 2002

15168 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smh
Do you guys also plan to bring numbers below 2M to a higher level?
Everyone decides for him/herself what suits best. There is at least one person checking in results in that range every week, for quite some time now. Recently all exponents were factored up to 2^57. He is continuing now up to 2^58. But I guess he would appreciate help in that range.
tha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-23, 13:43   #6
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29·41 Posts
Default

Factoring these numbers is getting time consuming, and a lot of these numbers (especially the lower ones) have already had a lot of ECM or P-1.

For GIMPS it doesn't really matter if these numbers are factored or not, since they are already tested composite at least twice.

If you want to factor these numbers, there are probably more efficient ways then trial factoring.
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-24, 13:59   #7
jocelynl
 
Sep 2002

2·131 Posts
Default

What are you talking about?
79M - 79.3M is the end of the range. (79 300 000)

Are you doing 7.9m (7 900 000)?
If so, then yes, these have been done.
you should do 79M this range is very little time consuming it is very fast at 2^58 one or two minutes per number.

Please let us know.
jocelynl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-24, 19:30   #8
tha
 
tha's Avatar
 
Dec 2002

2·32·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jocelynl
What are you talking about?
He is writing about the range 0 to 2,000,000

YotN,

Tha
tha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-24, 19:54   #9
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29×41 Posts
Default

Yes i am factoring 79M - 79.3M. It takes about a minute per number to factor from 2^58 to 2^59 and about 2500 numbers (IIRC) to be done in this range. But like i said, it's at low priority for me. The pc isn't on 24/7 and i might use the cpu for other things. Guess it will be done by the end of the week.

The 2M question had nothing to do with my reservation. I was just wondering if some people are planning to bring that range to the next bit level
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-02-25, 00:15   #10
trif
 
trif's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

2×101 Posts
Default

I know there is someone working down in that range because nofactor.cmp shows exponents there are being updated.

Getting all exponents to 58 bits is going to be a long time out there because there are many exponents that are assigned in PrimeNet that are only done to 57. It will be a very long time before they are all done.
trif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-03-01, 23:34   #11
smh
 
smh's Avatar
 
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471

29·41 Posts
Default

Range done, and results sent to George.
smh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 04:57.


Thu May 19 04:57:03 UTC 2022 up 35 days, 2:58, 0 users, load averages: 1.65, 1.38, 1.36

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔