![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate
19×41 Posts |
![]()
My last 4 are in the books.
I finished them much earlier than I originally thought because I thought I queued some work before them. Last fiddled with by tServo on 2022-01-12 at 18:59 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
26×101 Posts |
![]()
Thanks for your efforts.
Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-01-12 at 19:05 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate
19×41 Posts |
![]()
Whoops. I worked on the wrong set.
I will redo if you want or if you don't, I'll understand. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
145008 Posts |
![]()
Try again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
145008 Posts |
![]()
Per https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...2&postcount=20 tServo will do these, probably completing in January:
PRP=1,2,103404713,-1,76,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,108575167,-1,77,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 These are available: PRP=1,2,231695603,-1,79,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,276036017,-1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,285754177,-1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,315690521,-1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,369452123,-1,81,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1 PRP=1,2,852348659,-1,86,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1 (those exponents not present in this update have a completed PRP/proof & Cert) Only 6 more to claim for PRP with proof-generation, each of which will take a while. (Use prime95/mprime v30.3 or higher, or Gpuowl 6.11-318 or higher for PRP/proofgen.) M333333223 Kriesel PRPDC/GEC/proof-gen completed, and a cert will be needed. I think this will eventually appear in the special Cert assignments portion of https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...79&postcount=4. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"Marv"
May 2009
near the Tannhäuser Gate
19×41 Posts |
![]()
I should be finished.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
145008 Posts |
![]()
Only 6 more to claim for PRP with proof-generation, each of which will take a while. These are available:
PRP=1,2,231695603,-1,79,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,276036017,-1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,285754177,-1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,315690521,-1,80,0 Kriesel did first PRP shifted type 1 PRP=1,2,369452123,-1,81,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1 PRP=1,2,852348659,-1,86,0 Kriesel did first PRP unshifted type 1 (Use prime95/mprime v30.3 or higher, or Gpuowl 6.11-318 or higher for PRP/proof-gen. Be sure to upload the proof files if running gpuowl manually.) Thanks for the help. Please upload the proof files for PRP=1,2,103404713,-1,76,0 PRP=1,2,108575167,-1,77,0 so that the CERT runs can be issued as assignments. (It was discussed and decided when PRP with proof was being added as a GIMPS capability, that even with matching PRP 64-bit residues, if a proof file is available for the second PRP, the Cert will be run.) (those exponents not present in this update have a completed PRP/proof & Cert) Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-01-19 at 17:38 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
26·101 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-01-19 at 18:49 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
26·101 Posts |
![]()
I think these Mlucas versions are a little closer to the mark.
Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-01-26 at 00:17 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"Jorge Coveiro"
Nov 2006
Moura, Portugal
24×3 Posts |
![]()
Hi Kriesel.
Can I help with double-checks? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
26×101 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Feel free to reserve 276036017 or whatever other suits you, at https://www.mersenne.org/manual_assignment/, and run it on a reasonably efficient version of Gpuowl, with proof power ~9 on your GPU, or on a powerful CPU in mprime/prime95 V30.4 or newer, and plenty of available disk space for the temporary files, and post here that whichever exponent you choose has been claimed. A rough estimate of run time is ~2 weeks nonstop 24/7 for ~332M exponent PRP/GEC/proof on Radeon VII, ~20% longer on RX 6900XT, time varying as p2.1. When complete, report the results and upload the resulting proof file to the PrimeNet server. Easiest for gpuowl submission is use of Preda's primenet.py, but manual results page for the result line and drag and drop the proof file into a running primenet-connected mprime or prime95's folder works too. Gpuowl v6.11-357 to -380 or v7.2-53 or v7.2-86 would be good choices. Maybe benchmark which version is fastest for your setup in the necessary fft length. A rough estimate of 276036017 PRP duration is (276036017 / 332200000)2.1 x 15 days ~ 10 days on Radeon VII, ~12 days on RX 6900XT. At the other extreme 852M, ~108. days on Radeon VII, ~130. days on RX 6900XT. Even the smallest of these could take months or years on a medium speed CPU. 852M would be ~3.5 YEARS on an i5-1035G1; 276M would be ~4 months on that. Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-01-28 at 18:34 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Mixed Sierpinski conjecture base 5" proven!! (if probable primes allowed) | sweety439 | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 1 | 2020-12-21 14:08 |
Is "mung" or "munged" a negative word in a moral sense? | Uncwilly | Lounge | 15 | 2020-04-14 18:35 |
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" | wildrabbitt | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2015-03-06 08:17 |
Palindrome primes (a.k.a. Elementary S03E03 "Just a Regular Irregular") | Batalov | And now for something completely different | 12 | 2014-11-16 19:03 |
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |