mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Prime Gap Searches

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-08-21, 22:56   #1
Bobby Jacobs
 
Bobby Jacobs's Avatar
 
May 2018

2·32·11 Posts
Default The new record prime gaps

Now, we know two new record prime gaps, 1530 and 1550. There are some interesting things about the new maximal prime gaps.

The merits of all of the last 5 maximal prime gaps are less than the merit of the gap of size 1476. In fact, they are all less than the merit of the 1442 gap. Is that unusual?

The CSG ratios of the last few maximal prime gaps are below 0.8. There were a lot of gaps with CSG ratio above 0.8 before that. The new CSG ratios seem very low. Is that true?

I believe that the next maximal gap after 1550 will have high merit and CSG ratio. It will probably be very big.
Bobby Jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-08-22, 01:02   #2
rudy235
 
rudy235's Avatar
 
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.

967 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Jacobs View Post
Now, we know two new record prime gaps, 1530 and 1550. There are some interesting things about the new maximal prime gaps.

The merits of all of the last 5 maximal prime gaps are less than the merit of the gap of size 1476. In fact, they are all less than the merit of the 1442 gap. Is that unusual?

The CSG ratios of the last few maximal prime gaps are below 0.8. There were a lot of gaps with CSG ratio above 0.8 before that. The new CSG ratios seem very low. Is that true?

I believe that the next maximal gap after 1550 will have high merit and CSG ratio. It will probably be very big.
Hi. No, it is not unusual at all. Of the 80 maximal gaps a little bit over 50% (43) happen to have less merit than the highest merit up to that gap. Al such only 37 of the 80 gaps happen to have a higher merit than all previous.
if a new gap were to be found close to 1.85e19 it would have to be at least 1576 to get a higher merit than 35.31 . In average the Maximal Gaps grow about 14~16 each time, {1476, 1488, 1510, 1526,1530, 1550} and very rarely over 28 in one turn, so it might take a few lucky breaks to be a higher merit than 35.31
rudy235 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-08-29, 18:19   #3
Bobby Jacobs
 
Bobby Jacobs's Avatar
 
May 2018

2×32×11 Posts
Default

I hope the next maximal prime gap is over 1600.
Bobby Jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-14, 19:31   #4
Bobby Jacobs
 
Bobby Jacobs's Avatar
 
May 2018

C616 Posts
Default

The thing to look at is the value of (g-log2(p)+2*log(p)*log(log(p)))/log(p). An average maximal prime gap will have a value of about 0. A big gap will have a value greater than 0. A small gap will have a value less than 0. The last few maximal prime gaps have low values.
Bobby Jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-27, 23:55   #5
Bobby Jacobs
 
Bobby Jacobs's Avatar
 
May 2018

3068 Posts
Default

Call the number (g-log2(p)+2*log(p)*log(log(p)))/log(p) the Jacobs value of the prime gap. Then, the gap with the biggest Jacobs value known is the gap of 1132 between 1693182318746371 and 1693182318747503. It has a Jacobs value of 4.3316.
Bobby Jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-28, 17:39   #6
rudy235
 
rudy235's Avatar
 
Jun 2015
Vallejo, CA/.

96710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Jacobs View Post
Call the number (g-log2(p)+2*log(p)*log(log(p)))/log(p) the Jacobs value of the prime gap. Then, the gap with the biggest Jacobs value known is the gap of 1132 between 1693182318746371 and 1693182318747503. It has a Jacobs value of 4.3316.
I believe the C-S-G already has the gap of 1132 as the highest in that order.
The Cramér–Shanks–Granville ratio is the ratio of gn / (ln(pn))2 in the case of 1132 it is 0.9206386 for the prime 1693182318746371.

The next highest C-S-G ratio belongs to the gap of 906 discovered by Dr. Nicely in 1996 after prime 218209405436543. The C-S-G ratio is 0.8311

The next in decreasing order is the gap of 766 discovered by Young & Potler in 1989 after prime 19581334192423 The C-S-G ratio is 0.8178
rudy235 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-07, 23:39   #7
Bobby Jacobs
 
Bobby Jacobs's Avatar
 
May 2018

110001102 Posts
Default

FYI, the gaps of 1530 and 1550 both have Jacobs values of about -2. That is very low. I knew that they seemed like small gaps!

Last fiddled with by Bobby Jacobs on 2018-12-07 at 23:41
Bobby Jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prime gaps Terence Schraut Miscellaneous Math 10 2020-09-01 23:49
Gaps between maximal prime gaps Bobby Jacobs Prime Gap Searches 52 2020-08-22 15:20
No way to measure record prime gaps Bobby Jacobs Prime Gap Searches 42 2019-02-27 21:54
Prime gaps above 2^64 Bobby Jacobs Prime Gap Searches 11 2018-07-02 00:28
Prime gaps and storage HellGauss Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 18 2015-11-16 14:21

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:22.

Wed Nov 25 09:22:14 UTC 2020 up 76 days, 6:33, 4 users, load averages: 1.84, 1.70, 1.53

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.