mersenneforum.org GPU to 72 status...
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2020-04-12, 08:15 #4852 bayanne     "Tony Gott" Aug 2002 Yell, Shetland, UK 3·107 Posts A little bemused that srbase do not seem to be reporting the level of factors that they had once been doing, or have I got it wrong, in some way ...
2020-04-12, 14:31   #4853
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!

"Wayne"
Nov 2006

32·7·73 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by bayanne A little bemused that srbase do not seem to be reporting the level of factors that they had once been doing, or have I got it wrong, in some way ...
He's now factoring to 78 bits. At first it only to 74.

Here is his daily chart.

https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker...343cbfa4f0cd1/

2020-04-12, 16:38   #4854
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

3·52·127 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by petrw1 He's now factoring to 78 bits. At first it only to 74.
Yes. He's /not/ cheating -- this is simply a function of his swarm doing the deeper work, and so fewer factors are found per wall-clock time.

When he starts doing 73 to 74 again (which he's free to continue getting from GPU72) his factors found will increase again.

 2020-04-12, 20:11 #4855 chalsall If I May     "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 3×52×127 Posts Quick update... So, a quick update... 1. Yesterday I moved into production version 0.422 of the GPU72_TF payload. This fixes the bug which caused the cron sub-system to sometimes not be installed, and thus the check-point files for the P-1'ing CPU runs not being thrown back to the server. Thanks to PhilF for pointing out my SPE. 2. The auto submission of results to Primenet from Colab TF'ing runs now correctly populates the Facts table when a factor is found. 2.1. I've written and run a script that back-filled all 454 cases where the Factor was not correctly recorded. 2.2. This means the reports and charts should once again be sane.
2020-04-12, 20:14   #4856
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

19·499 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall 2.2. This means the reports and charts should once again be sane.

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2020-04-12 at 20:15

 2020-04-12, 20:56 #4857 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 19×499 Posts Does this look ok? I have seen something like this a few times recently. Code: Exiting... 20200412_205357 INFO: Comms spider starting... 20200412_205357 INFO: Gracefull shutdown... cat: worktodo.txt: No such file or directory Use of uninitialized value \$AID in concatenation (.) or string at ./comms.pl line 309. Done.
2020-04-12, 21:06   #4858
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

3×52×127 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Does this look ok? I have seen something like this a few times recently.
OK, thanks for the report. It's harmless, although I'll add a conditional to handle it more gracefully.

 2020-04-13, 03:47 #4859 LaurV Romulan Interpreter     Jun 2011 Thailand 33×347 Posts Chris, any big trouble to add one or two more columns to this table ("77" and "78") and rename the last to ">77" or ">78"? If not big trouble, then please? (but if trouble, then forget it, there are not so many people crunching there anyhow, however, adding some column may "stimulate" them? ) Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2020-04-13 at 03:48 Reason: ...grrr... forgot the link...
2020-04-13, 17:39   #4860
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

3·52·127 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV Chris, any big trouble to add one or two more columns to this table ("77" and "78") and rename the last to ">77" or ">78"?
Yeah. That's on my todo list. There's actually quite a bit of back-end work involved with that report, but it needs to be done.

There's also the issue of the web page's width. I run 1920 by 1080 (times three), but not everyone does. I may drop the DC 68and 69 columns, since that work is from years ago, and there are only ~400K such runs. I'll have a "< 71" column instead, which will be an aggregate.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV If not big trouble, then please? (but if trouble, then forget it, there are not so many people crunching there anyhow, however, adding some column may "stimulate" them? )
Yeah... The "real" GPU72 BOINC system will regularly go up to 78, so it will be worthwhile having that data exposed.

2020-04-13, 19:10   #4861
James Heinrich

"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

22×3×277 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall I run 1920 by 1080 (times three), but not everyone does.
I run 1280x1080 (x2) (two windows on 2560x1080) and the screen already cuts off halfway through the yellow "Saved" column.

 2020-04-13, 19:17 #4862 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 19×499 Posts On one machine I am running a 1080 x 1920 on the left and a 1920 x 1080 on the right. Before my current dual screen I was using just the 1920 x 1080 (I do most of my browsing on it still.)

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Primeinator Operation Billion Digits 5 2011-12-06 02:35 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 27 2008-09-29 13:52 Uncwilly Operation Billion Digits 22 2005-10-25 14:05 paulunderwood 3*2^n-1 Search 2 2005-03-13 17:03 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 25 2004-06-18 16:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:47.

Wed Apr 14 07:47:58 UTC 2021 up 6 days, 2:28, 0 users, load averages: 1.71, 1.66, 1.61