mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-05-16, 23:27   #1
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

52×127 Posts
Default P-1 factoring != "Mersenne numbers to factor"?

How can I do P1 factoring only, the part that takes large quantities of RAM? I thought that choosing only "Mersenne numbers to factor" would do it, but that seems to be only factoring that doesn't require much RAM. I have plenty of RAM in one of my machines and would like to make use of it so that people with less RAM don't have to do the P1 factoring part, they can go straight to LL. Is this possible? I suppose I could just grab exponents and then manually unreserve them once the P1 part is done, but that seems silly...

Or am I trying to do something pointless?
James Heinrich is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 00:21   #2
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

8,861 Posts
Default

There are a few ways to try to do P-1 only.

there have been attempts to do P-1 in a semi-auto mode. See this
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread....1671#post11671


There is more discussion here.
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2266

What you are talking about is not pointless. As a matter of fact, there are several folks that are trying to "clean-up" all exponents that have had 1 L-L, but weren't P-1'ed. This can help save DC'ing time. With lots of RAM, you could help. Look att this subforum http://mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=30
Uncwilly is online now  
Old 2004-05-17, 00:43   #3
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

52·127 Posts
Default

Thanks Uncwilly.
It seems far less automated than I had hoped

I look forward to the time when it's an integrated part of the client itself

Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2004-05-17 at 00:44
James Heinrich is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 01:39   #4
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22·3·599 Posts
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich
It seems far less automated than I had hoped

I look forward to the time when it's an integrated part of the client itself
(1) It's actually mostly a deficit in the server. The PrimeNet server has not had the capability to hand out P-1 (only) assignments, so there was no point in having the Prime95 client offer to get P-1 (only) assignments.

(2) When Prime95 was originally written, it did not include any capability to perform P-1 (or ECM) factoring. The only factoring method it offered was "trial factoring", and none of the messages bothered to include the qualifier "trial" -- so all messages referred to simply "factoring" or "factor". Later, when P-1 and ECM factoring were added, the existing messages were not changed, so an unqualified "factor" or "factoring" still meant only trial factoring, but the user is not explicitly informed of this by the documentation.

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2004-05-17 at 01:46
cheesehead is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 02:00   #5
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22×3×599 Posts
Default

I tried to amend my preceding message to say that the situation is the fault of both the server and the client, but the editing deadline had expired.
cheesehead is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 04:40   #6
dave_0273
 
dave_0273's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Australia, Brisbane

1D616 Posts
Default

I would love to have you helping out in the Mersenne-Aries work. I am obsessed with p-1 testing and that is what I have both of my p4s on. The only disadvantage about doing this is that about once a week you manually have to submit results and update worktodo.ini but that only takes about a minute.

But the decision is up to you. You won't find a new prime this way but I find it more exciting than LL testing.
dave_0273 is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 04:52   #7
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

52×127 Posts
Default

The chance of me finding a prime anyway is what, 1/200000, so I'm not worried much about losing that chance

I assume the above-mentioned post is still the best method to engage in this testing? If not, or if you have any suggestions please let me know.
James Heinrich is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 06:27   #8
markr
 
markr's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney

13·43 Posts
Default

I found the semi-automatic method described in the "above-mentioned post" was not very useful - most exponents in the current primenet ranges have been P-1'd, thanks in large part to the Mersenne-aries - see their subforum of the Data forum. They'd love to have you on board - there's plenty more P-1 to do!
markr is offline  
Old 2004-05-17, 11:09   #9
dave_0273
 
dave_0273's Avatar
 
Oct 2003
Australia, Brisbane

2×5×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich
The chance of me finding a prime anyway is what, 1/200000, so I'm not worried much about losing that chance

I assume the above-mentioned post is still the best method to engage in this testing? If not, or if you have any suggestions please let me know.
No, that method is pretty much useless now. The best way to do p-1 facoring is the mersenne-aries sub forum. (Go into data and then into Marin's Mesenne-Aries). If you would like bigger blocks of 50, just let me know. There are literally 1000s of p-1 work to do so there is heaps to go around
dave_0273 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" wildrabbitt Miscellaneous Math 11 2015-03-06 08:17
"factoring" vs "factorizing" ixfd64 Factoring 4 2012-10-16 04:07
Specifing TF factor depth in "Manual Assignments"? kracker PrimeNet 2 2012-07-22 17:49
"On factors of Mersenne numbers" - Seiji Tomita cheesehead Math 6 2009-12-15 17:45
trial factoring of "small" mersenne numbers antiroach Lone Mersenne Hunters 6 2003-07-16 23:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:42.

Mon Nov 23 19:42:50 UTC 2020 up 74 days, 16:53, 3 users, load averages: 2.59, 2.54, 2.56

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.