![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
33×367 Posts |
![]()
Hello,
I was hoping someone could shed some light on the usage of Prime95 as a tool to test for system stability. I know that different FFT sizes stress different aspects (e.g. smaller sizes stress the CPU, FPU, and L1 cache, while larger sizes may stress the memory, memory controller, and higher level caches more). Therefore, if a comprehensive test is desired, a variety of FFT sizes should be tested. My question has to do with the "time to run each FFT size" setting available when running a custom test. Is there any significance in how long each size is tested? I know that it will cycle through the various sizes, and restart once it's done all of them. So if one is going to stress test for a specific amount of time (say, 12 hrs), would it make any difference if each size was tested for 1 min vs. the default setting of 15 mins? I am thinking there could be a benefit in testing each size for 1 minute, in that the more frequent size switching would ensure that each size is given more equal test time. If it waits 15 mintutes before switching sizes, some sizes might not get tested as thououghly (or at all) if the total test time isn't long enough to cycle through all of them. But is there any downside to a shorter time before changing sizes that I'm not considering? Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
769210 Posts |
![]()
It's called a "torture" test, not a "quick breeze-through" test.
Why would you want to test for such a short total time that it couldn't do each FFT size for 15 minutes? Concentrating on doing the same computation for that long allows heat to build up, to give a good chance of detecting whether a circuit is going to fail when it gets hot. Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2012-07-31 at 06:26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
24·643 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
13×89 Posts |
![]()
Those old fashioned forms of torture just aren't as effective as the more modern psywar stuff. For more information see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_bieber
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
22·2,213 Posts |
![]()
Because, as I mentioned in the original post, you might not get all FFT sizes tested equally, or at all, with longer test times. For example, if you test for 12hrs, that may not even be enough time to run through all FFT sizes @ 15 mins each, so you end up testing some for 15 mins, and some not at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2012-08-01 at 00:52 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Aug 2012
1310 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? | swinster | Software | 2 | 2007-12-01 17:54 |
torture test help | teotic_hk | Hardware | 8 | 2004-03-22 20:23 |
How do I run torture test? | ZTaylor | Software | 2 | 2004-01-25 18:14 |
Torture test | Zydot | Hardware | 13 | 2004-01-14 02:33 |
Torture test not torture enough? | cmokruhl | Software | 3 | 2003-01-08 00:14 |