![]() |
![]() |
#155 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
81416 Posts |
![]()
Can we upgrade in the middle of a PRP run with 7.1?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#156 |
"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015
17·79 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#157 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
22×11×47 Posts |
![]()
Just tried to update to 7.2 and got the following error
Code:
Gpu.cpp:37:15: error: static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression static_assert(sinl(M_PI) != sin(M_PI)); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#158 |
"Ethan O'Connor"
Oct 2002
GIMPS since Jan 1996
9210 Posts |
![]()
I think commit 0ce8b7cf728cb800e95f896ec8974608f882a248 (Proof verify from temporary proof file) broke proof file handling on Windows.
I'm not certain, but I believe file rename operations can't cross directory boundaries on Windows, so Code:
gpu.cpp: 1449 fs::rename(tmpFile, proofFile); The change below gets past the rename: Code:
--- a/Gpu.cpp +++ b/Gpu.cpp @@ -1448,7 +1448,8 @@ fs::path Gpu::saveProof(const Args& args, const ProofSet& proofSet) { if (ok) { error_code noThrow; fs::remove(proofFile, noThrow); - fs::rename(tmpFile, proofFile); + fs::copy(tmpFile, proofFile); + fs::remove(tmpFile, noThrow); log("Proof '%s' generated\n", proofFile.string().c_str()); return proofFile; } Code:
2020-11-02 19:01:17 Highland20201080ti 1060223 Proof 'proof\1060223-8.proof' generated 2020-11-02 19:01:17 Highland20201080ti 1060223 Released memory lock 'memlock-0' 2020-11-02 19:01:17 Highland20201080ti 1060223 Proof file 'proof\1060223-8.proof' has invalid header 2020-11-02 19:01:17 Highland20201080ti Exiting because "Invalid proof header" 2020-11-02 19:01:17 Highland20201080ti Bye Last fiddled with by Ethan (EO) on 2020-11-03 at 03:08 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#159 | |
"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015
17×79 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by preda on 2020-11-03 at 10:28 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#160 |
"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015
17·79 Posts |
![]()
Just comment out that line. I commited this change too, but you can also apply it locally (prepend "//").
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#161 |
Aug 2020
37 Posts |
![]()
Repeatedly when restarting. What to do now?
Code:
2020-11-03 10:35:04 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-2-ga135d8d 2020-11-03 10:35:04 Note: not found 'c:\gpuowl\pool\config.txt' 2020-11-03 10:35:04 config: -user al -cpu Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 -d 0 -pool c:\gpuowl\pool -maxAlloc 7500 -proof 9 2020-11-03 10:35:04 device 0, unique id '' 2020-11-03 10:35:04 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 FFT: 6M 1K:12:256 (17.33 bpw) 2020-11-03 10:35:05 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 OpenCL args "-DEXP=109003607u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=12u -DAMDGPU=1 -DCARRY64=1 -DCARRYM64=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0x9.88af22f9109d8p-4 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0xb.f2c012041673p-5 -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only " 2020-11-03 10:35:05 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 ASM compilation failed, retrying compilation using NO_ASM 2020-11-03 10:35:07 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 OpenCL compilation in 2.63 s 2020-11-03 10:35:08 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 maxAlloc: 7.3 GB 2020-11-03 10:35:08 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 P1(5.5M) 7935851 bits 2020-11-03 10:35:08 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 PRP starting from beginning 2020-11-03 10:35:08 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 Acquired memory lock 'c:\gpuowl\pool\memlock-0' 2020-11-03 10:35:08 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 P1(5.5M) using 296 buffers 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [0] febc0320 != fffffffb 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [1] ebdffc29 != 00000019 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [2] 1d004502 != ffffff83 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [3] 8000c772 != 00000271 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [4] cfeb1bc7 != fffff3cb 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [5] fffcfd30 != 00003d09 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [6] 00bbcec7 != fffeced3 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [7] f31df59e != 0005f5e1 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [8] 1ea21f6a != ffe2329b 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [9] a694d47a != 009502f9 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [10] c51a8525 != fd16f123 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [11] 8e884a5b != 0e8d4a51 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [12] b5700c45 != b73d8c6b 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [13] 70b04163 != 6bcc41e9 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [14] e1a2a8c3 != e502b673 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [15] f0f29ec1 != 86f26fc1 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [16] 3143d339 != 5d43d13b 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [17] 2db9e9d4 != 2dace9d9 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [18] 9bcdeed5 != 1b9f6ec3 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 [19] 76d3d797 != 75e2d631 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 fold() does not roundtrip 2020-11-03 10:35:10 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 P1(5.5M) releasing 296 buffers 2020-11-03 10:35:11 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 109003607 Released memory lock 'c:\gpuowl\pool\memlock-0' 2020-11-03 10:35:11 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 Exiting because "fold roundtrip" 2020-11-03 10:35:11 Rig02-RadeonVII-01i2 Bye |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 | |
"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015
17·79 Posts |
![]() Quote:
EDIT: I tried your exponent, with a similar setup (see below) -- the same number of buffers, same -maxAlloc, same FFT size, and it works fine for me. So it's not a problem of FFT size. Now I see: you're not using ROCm, so you're probably on Windows? Adrenaline? Anyway, I also tried my compilation with -NO_ASM to reproduce closer the source your setup sees, and it still works for me. So at this point IMO this indicates a reduced precission of some FFT operations. Whether this is due to a bug in the OpenCL compiler (i.e. GPU driver), or not (i.e. the driver is within rights to generate the lower-precision variant), the outcome is the same. Increasing the FFT size may help, but would have a cost too. Running without P-1 may work too (but a pity if you wanted P-1). Using ROCm on Linux is another option. Code:
2020-11-03 21:44:24 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-8-g8906157 2020-11-03 21:44:24 config: -cpu XFX -uid 780c28c172da5ebb 2020-11-03 21:44:24 config: -prp 109003607 -B1 5500000 -maxAlloc 7.33G -use CARRY64,NO_ASM 2020-11-03 21:44:24 device 1, unique id '780c28c172da5ebb' 2020-11-03 21:44:24 XFX 109003607 FFT: 6M 1K:12:256 (17.33 bpw) 2020-11-03 21:44:25 XFX 109003607 OpenCL args "-DEXP=109003607u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=12u -DAMDGPU=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0x1.3115e45f2213bp-1 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x1.7e58024082ce6p-2 -DCARRY64=1 -DNO_ASM=1 -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only " 2020-11-03 21:44:27 XFX 109003607 OpenCL compilation in 2.38 s 2020-11-03 21:44:28 XFX 109003607 maxAlloc: 7.3 GB 2020-11-03 21:44:28 XFX 109003607 P1(5.5M) 7935851 bits 2020-11-03 21:44:28 XFX 109003607 PRP starting from beginning 2020-11-03 21:44:28 XFX 109003607 Acquired memory lock 'memlock-1' 2020-11-03 21:44:28 XFX 109003607 P1(5.5M) using 296 buffers 2020-11-03 21:44:38 XFX 109003607 OK 0 on-load: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003 Last fiddled with by preda on 2020-11-03 at 10:50 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015
17×79 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
"Ethan O'Connor"
Oct 2002
GIMPS since Jan 1996
22×23 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 | |
Aug 2020
3710 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Yes I am using Windows (see header message) I had not this problem with v.7.1.1 with other exponents with the same fft size. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GpuOwl PRP-Proof changes | preda | GpuOwl | 20 | 2020-10-17 06:51 |
gpuowl: runtime error | SELROC | GpuOwl | 59 | 2020-10-02 03:56 |
gpuOWL for Wagstaff | GP2 | GpuOwl | 22 | 2020-06-13 16:57 |
gpuowl tuning | M344587487 | GpuOwl | 14 | 2018-12-29 08:11 |
How to interface gpuOwl with PrimeNet | preda | PrimeNet | 2 | 2017-10-07 21:32 |