![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Nov 2006
Louisville, KY
33 Posts |
![]()
I noticed that the work queue was empty, and machines arent crunching. Just a heads up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sep 2006
Germany
BE16 Posts |
![]()
Number of pairs in work queue: 0
I think, you are just too fast for the server ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
![]()
When i am back home i have to check why the database job does not produce new work. There is enough work available for sure. It is defenitely no problem of the LLRnet server, there must be something wrong with one of my jobs.
Sorry, Lars Last fiddled with by ltd on 2006-11-21 at 12:13 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Apr 2003
22×193 Posts |
![]()
I know what happened and it is indead my fault. Sometimes i am such a stupid idiot.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() To speed up the search access for new WU i have put a upper limit for the value of n into the scripts. Now i have optimized the DB so there is no real need for that limit anymore but guess what i forgot the remove. And due to the fact that we have some powerusers at work at the moment we reached the limit much earlier as i would have believed. Again sorry and i will fix this as soon as i am home. Lars Who hopes that there is not to much disapointement about the lost cycles. Last fiddled with by ltd on 2006-11-21 at 12:26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Sep 2006
Germany
2·5·19 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Jan 2005
7378 Posts |
![]()
Sierpinski queue is sstill going fine :>
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Nov 2006
Louisville, KY
110112 Posts |
![]()
Lars,
no worries, we all make mistakes sometimes, just looking forward to getting some more work! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Apr 2003
14048 Posts |
![]()
It will take a little bit longer to reactivate the firstpass checks.
Therefore i will hand out all the missing low tests for riesel. Lars |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Apr 2003
11000001002 Posts |
![]()
Status report:
Stats will be off for the next two hours. The first new tests have entered the DB but due to some locking between the stats script and the insert script they enter the system to slow. Should be solved in the next half hour. Lars |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sep 2006
Germany
2·5·19 Posts |
![]()
@Birdman:
How many systems do you use?! 15 tests in about 20 seconds? I know, the n is really low, but this is FAST. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Apr 2003
77210 Posts |
![]()
News update:
There is enough work again. I will switch on the scripts within the next hour. Lars |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The best work for my CPU | MacMagnus | Information & Answers | 57 | 2013-11-22 16:27 |
How to calculate work/effort for PRP work? | James Heinrich | PrimeNet | 0 | 2011-06-28 19:29 |
No Work | Pilgrim | Information & Answers | 1 | 2008-01-31 18:53 |
It seems to work, but why ? | T.Rex | Math | 15 | 2005-10-15 10:38 |
work to do... | guido72 | Software | 2 | 2002-09-26 15:47 |