mersenneforum.org Queue management for e_small and 15e queues
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2020-10-12, 00:10   #23
swellman

Jun 2012

24×181 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chris2be8 Hello, Sorry for the abiguity in my post, I meant sieve f57_142p1 with the 15e siever, but on the 15e_small queue. Can you move it from the 15e queue to 15e_small (it's not started sieving yet so could be killed and a new job started). Chris
Done.

 2020-10-19, 16:05 #24 chris2be8     Sep 2009 2·7·139 Posts QUEUED AS f62_139m1 (62^139-1)/97857258923339 from the Brent tables: Code: # Built Sun Oct 18 17:00:27 2020 # Estimated SNFS difficulty 250, GNFS equivalent 180, GNFS difficulty 236, degree 6 n: 14185733400304036510196601146059296919042036934280442768139115644315608910132657743128124427208491632743079126485178377065201024816044499588491181863454412502799549508256180500767912163641548424241239153309532777664177989208786653135773 type: snfs c6: 62 c0: -1 # Y0 = 62^23 Y0: 167883826163764944817996215305490271305728 # Y1 = 1^0 Y1: 1 # msieve rating: skew 0.50, size 1.959e-12, alpha 2.205, combined = 1.940e-13 rroots = 2 skew: 0.503 rlim: 120000000 alim: 120000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 lss: 0 Sieve on 15e_small from 40M to 140M on the algebraic side. Test sieving 10k ranges: Code:  Q yield 40M 29397 80M 22114 120M 21957 160M 18276 200M 18125 I'll do the LA. NB. Does it matter if 15e_small runs dry? It's been a while since anyone else submitted any jobs to it. Chris Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-19 at 17:05
2020-10-19, 17:04   #25
VBCurtis

"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

32×499 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chris2be8 NB. Does it matter if 15e_small runs dry? It's been a while since anyone else submitted any jobs to it. Chris
It won't. I have a few jobs lined up, for one- but the queue has been pretty long the last couple weeks, so I haven't submitted. If it does get close to dry, we'll just post one of the smaller regular-15e job to it.

 2020-10-19, 23:31 #26 swellman     Jun 2012 24·181 Posts Canceling reservation for 9p8_305.
 2020-10-20, 20:59 #27 RichD     Sep 2008 Kansas 2×7×227 Posts QUEUED AS 480393499_29m1 C223 from the OPN t550 file. This is a 31/32 hybrid ready for 15e. Code: n: 3557476825584074523626141119131284720818433345255571798807840633164029997092314889363413908015914169945511419088824886271478160013365034892325967713723313895106737029561832633027700589079840210378212505320353489361330304701 # 480393499^29-1, difficulty: 260.45, skewness: 27.99, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 1.82616e+19, est. time: 8696.02 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 27.985 c6: 1 c0: -480393499 Y1: -1 Y0: 25585011002090143406286444340093545229467499 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 32 mfbr: 62 mfba: 93 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 3.6 Trial sieving 5K blocks. Code:  Q Yield 18M 11693 20M 11574 60M 10054 100M 9868 200M 7811 Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-20 at 21:53
 2020-10-21, 04:55 #28 VBCurtis     "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 32×499 Posts QUEUED AS 5_2_784m1 5*2^784-1 is ready for e_small: Code: n: 69475272587117279654444104365497064179578291322370498667495608475139216364204224199478826387431064886511250806440699432703118054778172450209485889451458469422481667416951414172976599441 type: snfs skew: 0.95 deg: 6 c6: 5 c0: -4 Y1: -1 Y0: 2722258935367507707706996859454145691648 rlim: 67000000 alim: 50000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 31 mfbr: 59 mfba: 58 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Q from 8-52M should yield 215M or so relations. Q-ranges of 1k were tested on the -a side: Code: #10M 5494 (0.071 sec) #15M 5282 (0.078 sec) #20M 5301 (0.079 sec) #25M 6444 (0.082 sec) #30M 6032 (0.087 sec) #35M 4832 (0.088 sec) #40M 4596 (0.094 sec) #45M 4083 (0.118 sec) #50M 4101 (0.127 sec) I'd like to handle the matrix. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-21 at 13:47 Reason: Fixed a data miscopy on test-sieve 45M and 50M
 2020-10-21, 06:50 #29 VBCurtis     "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 32×499 Posts QUEUED AS 5_2_791m1 5*2^791-1 is ready for e-small: Code: n: 11181286778075434656041528999956536722545430359473458156222713275373040350118089747209\$ type: snfs skew: 0.87 deg: 6 c6: 5 c0: -2 Y1: -1 Y0: 5444517870735015415413993718908291383296 rlim: 67000000 alim: 50000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 31 mfbr: 59 mfba: 58 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Test-sieving Q=1k chunks on the -a side suggests Q from 10-72M should yield 215-220M relations: Code: Q=10M 4252 rels 0.097 sec Q=15M 4042 rels 0.110 sec Q=20M 4390 rels 0.102 sec Q=25M 3486 rels 0.115 sec Q=30M 4389 rels 0.126 sec Q=35M 3940 rels 0.131 sec Q=40M 2443 rels 0.144 sec Q=45M 3437 rels 0.144 sec Q=50M 3385 rels 0.156 sec Q=55M 3310 rels 0.157 sec Q=60M 3500 rels 0.149 sec Q=65M 2272 rels 0.152 sec Q=70M 2577 rels 0.177 sec I'd like to handle the matrix. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-21 at 14:38
 2020-10-30, 06:49 #30 VBCurtis     "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 106138 Posts QUEUED AS 13_2_873m1 Seems I was a bit flippant in declaring the e-small queue was not in danger of running dry.... So, here's a slightly too-big candidate for e-small, 13*2^873-1: Code: n: 3339091209876304868223507042738464541169675059703221021138354474809617124164392284930943048735275519233752674328191141550682794451937099501781930817896939549837732767855865762522035141285939331506795809950951639695136117130483 type: snfs skew: 0.47 deg: 6 c6: 104 c0: -1 Y1: -1 Y0: 44601490397061246283071436545296723011960832 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 62 mfba: 92 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 3.7 Test-sieving 1kQ intervals on the -r side indicates a Q-range from 20-160M should be sufficient to produce 415M 32-LP relations. My tests indicate 32 is faster than 31, even though 31 is normal for this size of job. Code: Q=20M 3986 rels, 0.204 sec Q=40M 3448 rels, 0.213 sec Q=60M 2950 rels, 0.229 sec Q=80M 2800 rels, 0.241 sec Q=100M 2839 rels, 0.245 sec Q=120M 2758 rels, 0.263 sec Q=140M 2550 rels, 0.292 sec Q=160M 2633 rels, 0.312 sec Q=180M 2070 rels, 0.298 sec I'd like to handle the matrix. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-30 at 14:13
 2020-10-30, 07:31 #31 jyb     Aug 2005 Seattle, WA 22·3·7·19 Posts QUEUED AS 7p4_302 SNFS-255.22 C224 HCN (7+4,302), ECM to t56. For 15e small. Code: n: 57897530976737790932446470451414314786918349349905713322655806163387714958703027894833850972605248653868194657524542817786758191955860125935643587349616179808064337010364920064425051825311376917767110918586324072242766901793 # 7^302+4^302, difficulty: 255.22, skewness: 0.83, alpha: 0.00 skew: 0.830 c6: 49 c0: 16 Y1: -1267650600228229401496703205376 Y0: 1798465042647412146620280340569649349251249 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 Trial sieving 2K blocks. Code:  Q Yield --- ----- 20M 5420 50M 4379 80M 3715 110M 4344 140M 3264 170M 3036 200M 3241 230M 2743 Recommend sieving special Q on rational side, 20M - 150M. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-30 at 14:24
 2020-10-30, 14:02 #32 RichD     Sep 2008 Kansas 2×7×227 Posts QUEUED AS 23_193m1 C229 from the OPN t550 file. This is a 31/32 hybrid job. These parameters are just over the guidelines for e_small, so I'll let the admins decide which queue it should be placed. Code: n: 2362185209269399024660953053820920314812735736788392457152069157362797983840874631781985484267563373144143652943624233703935874146069988138440911184418060518221759609302925005768593053555824396683208669631553771713149002640832243 # 23^193-1, difficulty: 262.81, skewness: 0.59, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 2.17711e+19, est. time: 10367.21 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 0.593 c6: 23 c0: -1 Y1: -1 Y0: 37608910510519071039902074217516707306379521 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 32 mfbr: 62 mfba: 93 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 3.6 Trial sieving 5K blocks. Code:  Q Yield 20M 11574 60M 10266 100M 10010 190M 8118 Last fiddled with by swellman on 2020-10-30 at 14:58
2020-10-30, 14:33   #33
swellman

Jun 2012

55208 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by RichD C229 from the OPN t550 file. This is a 31/32 hybrid job. These parameters are just over the guidelines for e_small, so I'll let the admins decide which queue it should be placed. Code: n: 2362185209269399024660953053820920314812735736788392457152069157362797983840874631781985484267563373144143652943624233703935874146069988138440911184418060518221759609302925005768593053555824396683208669631553771713149002640832243 # 23^193-1, difficulty: 262.81, skewness: 0.59, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 2.17711e+19, est. time: 10367.21 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 0.593 c6: 23 c0: -1 Y1: -1 Y0: 37608910510519071039902074217516707306379521 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 32 mfbr: 62 mfba: 93 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 3.6 Trial sieving 5K blocks. Code:  Q Yield 20M 11574 60M 10266 100M 10010 190M 8118
I have no issue enqueuing this job even though itâ€™s a touch over the difficulty and Q range limits for e_small. Any objections?

 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post kriesel kriesel 7 2020-10-21 18:52 Rodrigo Software 7 2018-05-25 13:26 debrouxl NFS@Home 10 2018-05-06 21:05 joblack Information & Answers 1 2009-01-06 08:45 PrimeCroat Hardware 3 2004-02-17 19:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:27.

Mon Nov 30 21:27:12 UTC 2020 up 81 days, 18:38, 2 users, load averages: 2.17, 2.50, 2.46

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.