![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
DB316 Posts |
![]()
I keep getting errors with Prime95, but not much else. I'm unreserving the following exponents, and will stop running Prime95 until I figure out what's going on.(I may consider double checks)
The following exponents still need to be run. Code:
Pfactor=40018607,68.000000,4137260 Pfactor=40018609,68.000000,4137260 Pfactor=40018639,65,0 Pfactor=40018669,65,0 Pfactor=40018907,65,0 Last fiddled with by jasong on 2006-12-18 at 21:44 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sep 2006
Odenton, MD, USA
2778 Posts |
![]()
I'm getting the same type of errors with Prime95 v24.14. Could it a bug???
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Sep 2006
Odenton, MD, USA
191 Posts |
![]()
These are my observations with this problem.
By default, Prime95 v24.14 wants to trial factor these exponents to 68 bits before starting P-1 testing. The trial factoring runs fine and when finished, updates the Pfactore statement as shown below and then crashes. Quote:
Code:
Pfactor=40018639,65,0 Code:
factor=40018639,65 Pfactor=40018639,68,0 Code:
factor=40019467,65 factor=40019489,65 Pfactor=40019227,68,0 Last fiddled with by harlee on 2006-12-19 at 03:41 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
![]()
I don't know whether it's a bug or not, but I do know that I am now running a Prime95 torture test on both cpus for about 3 days to see if it's my cpus.
Please post if you're positive it's a bug. Edit: Reread your post and decided to bring my computer back online, although on a different project. Thanks for the heads-up, harlee. (You wouldn't happen to be black, would you? I have a black cat named Harle, and think it would be really cool if I met someone online with the same name and the same "race"[technically it's fur, rather than skin color] as my cat) Last fiddled with by jasong on 2006-12-20 at 01:54 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sep 2006
Odenton, MD, USA
191 Posts |
![]()
I posted the problem in the Software forum and "Prime95" issued a response: http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=6801
Harlee was the name of the kids pet rabbit. She passed away almost 11 years ago, but I still remember that she had two different eye colors (one brown and one blue). I'm using the different pets names as the account and computer name. Last fiddled with by harlee on 2006-12-20 at 03:55 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
DB316 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3×7×167 Posts |
![]()
If I may ask a possibly stupid question:
Wouldn´t it be easier to make it so there´s one line that JUST tells it to trial-factor, and another line that JUST tells it to P-1? Even if you only have a Gig of hard drive space left, there´s still plenty of room for a worktodo file that´s doubled in size. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Sep 2006
Odenton, MD, USA
191 Posts |
![]()
Tried that and Prime95 still crashes (see the 19 Dec 06, 03:34 AM posting).
If you want to do the two lines then don't add the Pfactor line for a given exponent until after that Factor line is completed and deleted from the worktodo.ini file. Last fiddled with by harlee on 2006-12-22 at 22:04 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P95 unreserving exponents | bcp19 | PrimeNet | 12 | 2012-01-26 04:28 |
Unreserving exponents via manual forms or not? | Boulder | PrimeNet | 3 | 2007-05-29 10:01 |
Temp-files after unreserving exponents | Matthias C. Noc | Software | 1 | 2004-09-17 08:54 |
Exponents that haven't had a P-1 test done | GP2 | Data | 20 | 2004-03-04 02:53 |
question about unreserving exponents | ixfd64 | Lounge | 5 | 2003-12-05 03:45 |