20131229, 02:48  #210 
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
7×37^{2} Posts 

20131229, 03:00  #211 
∂^{2}ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
11,633 Posts 

20131229, 05:30  #212 
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2^{2}·1,873 Posts 

20131229, 06:35  #213 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2^{2}·7·337 Posts 
"The sight is dismal;
And our affairs from England come too late: The ears are senseless that should give us hearing, To tell him his commandment is fulfill'd, That Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead" 
20131229, 17:09  #214 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
3^{2}·241 Posts 

20131229, 17:29  #215 
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
7×37^{2} Posts 

20131229, 20:18  #216 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
3^{2}×241 Posts 

20131229, 23:35  #217 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2^{2}×7×337 Posts 
It is called the Golden Rule:
"One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself." 
20140102, 01:42  #218  
May 2013
East. Always East.
11×157 Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
I always took the approach of "We can TF 63M  999M to 73 before ever contemplating TF to 74" vs "We can TF the work being done TOMORROW to 74 and worry about bringing the rest up to 73 and then 74 later when we're there" David: Your predictions of us being kneedeep in shit by the end of the month have been wrong. Repeatedly. Whatever your theory is must be completely wrong. I'm a bit too busy at the moment but I will go dig up these predictions if you deny having made them. Aramis kind of brings up an old point of mine. How long do you want us to TF to 73 for until we bring them to 74? We're obviously closeish to having the firepower to do 74, at the very least. This means we're almost capable of TF to 73 twice as many exponents as we can LL. How much of a buffer do you want? At worst, we release a few 73's (cue Chris to tell us about Spidy's ripcords). At best we TF extremely efficiently, using every bit of our firepower not a week too soon. In your lovely situation of having a 50,000 exponent buffer, we put loads of time into TF that only gets LL'ed six months down the line. Inefficient. 

20140102, 04:13  #219  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
10010101101111_{2} Posts 
Quote:
Nothing to see here; everything is fine.... 

20140102, 14:56  #220 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2·3·773 Posts 
GPU from 72
It appears George is letting standard factor assignments go to 72 bits in the 70M range.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion"  MooMoo2  Other Chess Games  5  20161022 01:55 
AouessareEl HaddouchiEssaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!"  wildrabbitt  Miscellaneous Math  11  20150306 08:17 
Specifing TF factor depth in "Manual Assignments"?  kracker  PrimeNet  2  20120722 17:49 
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier?  nitai1999  Software  7  20040826 18:12 