mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Other Stuff > Archived Projects > 15k Search

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-10-16, 10:50   #1
TTn
 

433 Posts
Default M1 thru M22

Not yet triple checked.

I would like others to help check this a few more times.
These small primes, are the most important of all general Mersenne primes.
Just as the smallest prime 2, sieves out half of all natural candidates.

I will release a beta version 1.7 that is stripped down a bit.
Please respond here if interested in helping the effort.
Your name will be imprinted far into the sequence of perfection!


Last fiddled with by TTn on 2004-10-16 at 10:53 Reason: oops
 
Old 2006-03-22, 01:30   #2
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

7×29×43 Posts
Default

Maybe a run on Glucas of all of these would take a handfull of days.
Uncwilly is online now  
Old 2006-03-24, 19:49   #3
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
República de California

979110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTn
Not yet triple checked.
By you, you mean. You think none of the folks who've written LL-test software of their own ever bothered to try it out on these?
ewmayer is offline  
Old 2006-03-25, 00:26   #4
TTn
 

7·181 Posts
Default clarification

I can't help but clarify this foolishness.

The general Mersenne primes (3,7,31,127,1279,...) between these Mersenne points {1 thru M22}!

Remember all Mersenne primes are general Mersenne primes, but the converse is not true.
If the number of Mersenne primes were finite, then the minimum (k=1), would be excluded from the general Mersenne prime sequence.
Hence making the minimum (k=3), which is absurd.
 
Old 2006-03-25, 01:43   #5
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
República de California

9,791 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTn
I can't help but clarify this foolishness.
Yes, please do - your thread-starting post clearly says "M1 through M22," which most reasonable people would assume means the first through 22nd known Mersenne primes. If you are referring to some other (known or presumed) primes, why don't you state clearly and unambiguously which ones you are referring to?

Similarly, you stated:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTn
I am banning this forum from my company forever.
So were you referring to the Mersenne forum in general, or just that particular subforum? Again, most reasonable people would assume the former, but alas it seems not to be so.
ewmayer is offline  
Old 2006-03-25, 02:47   #6
TTn
 

8,269 Posts
Default

Ewmayer,

This forum clearly and reasonably states general Mersenne primes, if anyone was listening to the project leader, and the other threads:

http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2222
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2218
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3602
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3596

Is it really my fault, that you ignore to understand this correctly?
 
 

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 18:26.

Sat Oct 24 18:26:09 UTC 2020 up 44 days, 15:37, 0 users, load averages: 2.29, 2.15, 2.03

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.