mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2004-03-08, 14:36   #1
Complex33
 
Complex33's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Texas

5·31 Posts
Default Server Overdue/Expire

I think I might have brought this up before but here are some thoughts. Would it be beneficial if the default time between check-ins for Prime95 was set to a number much lower than 28, say 1 or 2? This would cause the effective overdue/expire time to be reduced from 88 days to around 60 days, not to mention provide better exponent health/status map. I've noticed that the majority of expiring exponents are from accounts that are setup, reserve work, and then never communicate again. I would hope that a change here would reduce the number of stale exponents waiting for reassignment. Also I'd like to have the overdue check in days reduced from 60 but I don't know how many would be in favor of that. I'm just wanting to reduce the band of assigned exponents and try to clean up the trailing edge from exponents that repeatedly get assigned and never worked on. Any thoughts on this?
Complex33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-08, 17:50   #2
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

2×5×251 Posts
Default

This is a proposal worth considering but one also has to keep in mind the fact that some casual participants may be upset if Prime95 tries to communicate with the server too often. one of the great selling points of this project is it's fabulous capacity to work offline.

If the update number is set to one or two days, your casual participant is going to see a message like this very very often:

"ERROR 2250: Cannot contact Primenet Server"

Basically, everytime the machine is not connected to the Internet and Prime95 wants to send an update.

That having been said, we should do something to reduce the impact of these lay accounts on the huge rage in which exponents are assigned these days. The casual account count - measured by the largest Sxxxxxx account assigned - has gone up rapidly recently and is now up to S175000 or so. What's more, my preliminary datamining shows that 90% of these Sxxxxxx accounts never return a result.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-08, 22:48   #3
PrimeCruncher
 
PrimeCruncher's Avatar
 
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant

2·33·13 Posts
Default

I agree with garo, 1 or 2 days between updates is too often. I think 7 days would be resonable.
PrimeCruncher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-09, 13:52   #4
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

2·3·293 Posts
Default

Is it possible to view the history of ANY LL test (that is, a graph of iteration number against time)?
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2004-03-09, 14:11   #5
MrHappy
 
MrHappy's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Paisley Park & Neverland

18510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jinydu
Is it possible to view the history of ANY LL test (that is, a graph of iteration number against time)?
GP2 has shown something like that but it's not possible for non-prime95 clients, i think.
MrHappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ok to let it expire? Richard Cameron Information & Answers 4 2011-09-30 20:17
Isn't a new M. prime overdue? joblack Lounge 86 2010-12-28 18:35
Do LL's expire? hj47 PrimeNet 2 2009-06-14 04:56
Overdue Prime Rally masser Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 49 2008-08-24 20:19
Will my exponent expire? edorajh Data 2 2003-11-12 13:08

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:58.

Wed Oct 21 07:58:07 UTC 2020 up 41 days, 5:09, 0 users, load averages: 1.23, 1.31, 1.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.