20080407, 15:42  #89 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
3·7·487 Posts 
Anon,
P=6T (6000G) is almost right at optimal sieve depth for n=100K150K. Analysis for P=6T6.1T: Given by you: Expected factors: 82.98 Prange: 0.1T (100G) Prate/sec: 1338246 Time to complete range: 100G / 1338246 secs. = 74725 secs. Removal rate: 74725 secs. / 82.98 facs. = 900.5 secs. / fac. LLR test at n=135K: 876.5 secs. We're just slightly past optimal depth at P=6T, which is the way I think it should be. I was thinking it would be a little higher but finding the prime for k=66520 helped reduce it a little bit. Go ahead and remove n=100K150K from the big sieved file that has had all its factors removed to P=6T and repost a new file for n=150K400K only. People with current reservations can decide if they want to use the new file for continuing in the middle of their reservation. Since Beyond is still working on his machines or doing other work, there's still a fair amount of LLRnet work for n<100K so you can hold off on adding it to the LLRnet queue for now. See next para. I've had 2 cores on it over the weekend and at this moment, it's almost right at n=99K but then there are 3 k's for n=60K100K that are in the queue that still need to be processed; which is a lot of work. Can I get some opinions on whether we should post manual reservations for Sierp base 6? Does anyone feel that there are some people that would work on this base using manual reservations? The response to the manual reservations for n<100K was rather tepid, although I/we didn't promote it much. Thanks, Gary 
20080407, 16:29  #90  
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
79^{2} Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As soon as you give the allclear on whether leaving 2 k's for manual reservation is OK, I'll go ahead and split up the 100K150K chunk of the sieve file for PRPing and post some files in the Drive #3 thread. 

20080407, 16:41  #91 
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
79^{2} Posts 
Hi all,
Here's a new sieve file, with the range 100K150K removed now that we've broken it off for PRPing. Thus, this sieve file contains a total range of 150K400K. It is highly recommended that you switch to this new sieve file, even in the middle of a rangeit should have a noticeable speed increase over the old one, because of the smaller range. You can continue running your range with the old one if you want, but you'll probably want to switch to the new one. Just download the zip file, replace sr2data.txt in your sr2sieve folder with the one in the new zip file, and stop and restart sr2sieve. Anon Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 20080424 at 04:52 
20080407, 16:46  #92 
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
79^{2} Posts 
Gary, I sent you the 100K150K portion of the sieve file that I broke off, so now both you and I have a copy.

20080408, 06:42  #93  
May 2007
Kansas; USA
3×7×487 Posts 
Quote:
Don't post any n>100K files for anything yet until LLRnet has tested everything to n=100K including the 3 k's above. It'd be duplicate work to be testing the same k's at 2 different nvalues. Edit: You could go ahead and have IronBits load n=100K110K in the server for all k's except the 3 above but it should still be a while until that is needed. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20080408 at 15:58 

20080408, 06:50  #94  
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
79^{2} Posts 
Quote:


20080408, 06:51  #95 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
3·7·487 Posts 
P=6510G6600G complete; factors sent.
Reserving P=6600G7000G. 
20080408, 15:18  #96 
Feb 2007
2^{2}·31 Posts 
6000G6500G KriZp complete
reserving 7000G8000G 
20080408, 15:57  #97 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
3×7×487 Posts 
Anon,
Like before, when you have received all of the factors up to P=8T and have removed them, please run a quickie test for P=8T8.1T and post the same stats as before. I like doing the math but if you want to do the calculation, that works for me. An educated guess says the optimal for n=150K200K will be P=~9T10T. Gary 
20080408, 17:10  #98  
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
14141_{8} Posts 
Quote:


20080410, 16:58  #99 
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
6241_{10} Posts 
As some of you may have noticed in the Drive #3 thread, there's been a little bit of a mixup regarding one of the k's in this sieve. We forgot to include one of the k's in the sieve that we were supposed to, and instead accidentally left in one that we had already found a prime on. I'll be posting a sieve file with the leftin k removed later today (don't have time right now); meanwhile, Gary is sieving the missing k to get it caught up with this sieve.
If all of you would please refrain from making reservations on this sieve for p>8T for the time being, that would be great, as it would make the catchup operation for the missing k go a lot easier. I'll be sure to post here as soon as it's all clear to make further reservations. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Riesel/Sierp base 2 evenk/evenn/oddn testing  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  423  20201025 10:34 
Sierp base 6  team drive #3  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  373  20140611 21:31 
Sierp base 16  team drive #1  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  254  20140610 16:00 
Sierp base 63  team drive #5  rogue  Conjectures 'R Us  146  20110420 05:12 
Sierp base 3  minidrive Ib  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  43  20090306 08:41 