mersenneforum.org Double checking
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2007-11-08, 17:50 #34 Kosmaj     Nov 2003 2·1,811 Posts Thomas and I filled gaps of all Ks from the 4th Drive appearing on his list, except those that you did. Keller doesn't accept proxy reports (I tell you, you tell him) but I'll report all of them soon.
 2007-11-08, 17:52 #35 gd_barnes     May 2007 Kansas; USA 5×2,111 Posts Double-check done for 300
 2007-11-08, 18:37 #36 Kosmaj     Nov 2003 2·1,811 Posts Next you can double check some Ks from the 5th Drive. With exception of k=57 which has no gaps, the status of other four k<=135 is not clear because Sax hasn't reported his completed ranges, but you can work on k>200 with exception of k=285 which I mostly did and will finish it in a few days. Here is the list of remaining eight k>=213 (some have multiple small gaps): Code:  k nmin nmax 213 100 250 237 230 260 249 150 200 249 230 260 261 135 150 261 155 260 267 155 160 267 180 205 267 260 300 273 100 120 273 130 150 273 155 170 273 175 180 279 100 130 279 135 145 279 155 165 279 230 260 291 130 165 Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2007-11-08 at 18:42
2007-11-08, 22:34   #37
gd_barnes

May 2007
Kansas; USA

293B16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Kosmaj Next you can double check some Ks from the 5th Drive. With exception of k=57 which has no gaps, the status of other four k<=135 is not clear because Sax hasn't reported his completed ranges, but you can work on k>200 with exception of k=285 which I mostly did and will finish it in a few days. Here is the list of remaining eight k>=213 (some have multiple small gaps): Code:  k nmin nmax 213 100 250 237 230 260 249 150 200 249 230 260 261 135 150 261 155 260 267 155 160 267 180 205 267 260 300 273 100 120 273 130 150 273 155 170 273 175 180 279 100 130 279 135 145 279 155 165 279 230 260 291 130 165
Cool! I'll start on these in 1-2 weeks. Since I'm well past halfway on my current double-check effort, I want to finish most of it up first. Most of the ranges here are relatively small except for k=213 and 261 so it shouldn't be too bad of an effort.

Thanks,
Gary

 2007-11-14, 18:44 #38 gd_barnes     May 2007 Kansas; USA 293B16 Posts Do. check for k=300-400 & 900-1001 for 50K
 2007-11-20, 06:18 #39 gd_barnes     May 2007 Kansas; USA 5×2,111 Posts Kosmaj, All double-checking for 300
 2007-11-21, 07:59 #40 gd_barnes     May 2007 Kansas; USA 5·2,111 Posts 300
 2007-11-21, 08:51 #41 em99010pepe     Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts Gary, Please count with my help.... Carlos
2007-11-21, 16:02   #42
gd_barnes

May 2007
Kansas; USA

5×2,111 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by em99010pepe Gary, Please count with my help.... Carlos
Thanks, Carlos. That would be great. I'll let you know. I'm shooting to start the effort in March-April 2008 after my 12 heavy-weight k's are done LLRing to n=400K. (Very rought estimate.)

Gary

2007-11-21, 16:56   #43
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo

Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

11000011010012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by gd_barnes I have completed all k-ranges for the double-check for 300
Congratulations on getting it finished! That was a lot of heavy lifting. But the error rate is quite appalling.

As for using PrimeGrid/BOINC/LLRNet to help do the 300<k<1001 doublecheck sometime later: Yes, it might be doable--would this be considered part of RPS, or would it be considered an outside effort? If it would be part of RPS, then we obviously already have Kosmaj's ruling that RPS should stay independent (i.e. no PrimeGrid)--but if it's separate from RPS (since those are Prime Search ranges, thus not technically RPS), then we might be able to go that route.

2007-11-21, 19:32   #44
gd_barnes

May 2007
Kansas; USA

244738 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Anonymous Congratulations on getting it finished! That was a lot of heavy lifting. But the error rate is quite appalling. As for using PrimeGrid/BOINC/LLRNet to help do the 300
Good questions. I can't speak for Kosmaj but I don't think he'd have a problem. I think his objection would come in more if it were k < 300 and/or if we ended up getting reportable primes out of it. Kosmaj, feel free to comment on this if you want.

I would consider this to be project-independent. It's neither RPS nor Prime Search nor any other project. I'm just choosing to coordinate it here because I know people here and 15k.org now lists ALL known Riesel k's. For that matter, I could have coordinated it through one of the other Prime search projects here at mersenneforum.org.

Gary

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post pinhodecarlos Prime Gap Searches 13 2017-12-09 06:07 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Unregistered Information & Answers 19 2011-07-29 09:57 jobhoti Math 17 2004-05-21 05:02 Quacky Lounge 5 2003-12-03 02:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:18.

Thu Dec 2 20:18:10 UTC 2021 up 132 days, 14:47, 0 users, load averages: 1.24, 1.46, 1.61