mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-11-06, 16:16   #45
uigrad
 
uigrad's Avatar
 
Aug 2008

2·43 Posts
Default

I just realized that all v4 assignments I've turned in since the switch are still listed in my assignment page! Most of them have a negative value for days to go.

Are we supposed manually release these assignments after they are finished and turned in?
uigrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-06, 16:19   #46
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22·691 Posts
Default

Are they TFs? There is a known bug with TFs but LLs and DCs should unreserve.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-06, 16:23   #47
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

463810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
Are they TFs? There is a known bug with TFs but LLs and DCs should unreserve.
I have assignments that are not dropping off either. In my observation TFs that find a factor are dropping off. Those that do NOT are staying on the list. I assume that is on George's return list.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-07, 21:33   #48
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2×3×773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ixfd64 View Post
I don't know if this has been fixed yet, but v5 will reject certain v4 TF results submitted through Prime95 v25.x. The problem is that v25.x.x sends results every time it finishes factoring a bit depth, but v24.x does not send any results until the assignment is completely finished.

Two weeks ago, I upgraded from v24.14 to v25.7 in the middle of an assignment because the GIMPS website said it was safe to do so. It seems PrimeNet does not accept TF results unless it has known data for the lower bit depths. For example, it won't accept "no factor from 2^68 to 2^69" if the exponent has "no factor to 2^64" at most.

Since I upgraded to v25.x in the middle of the TF assignment, PrimeNet never got the the data for the lower bit depths.
Code:
Exponent Status Data  
50324467 No factors below 2^63 
 Assigned LL testing to "petrw1" on 2008-10-27 
 History no factor from 2^68 to 2^69 by "petrw1" on 2008-11-07
Yes the Exponent Status Report does look suspect ... it appears to be missing some bits even though I did start at 64.
I wasn't assigned it as LL but rather TF ... the v5 conversion just labelled it as LL.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-07, 21:44   #49
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

238210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
Submit on the manual pages.
I tried it last time and it didn't work. I just tried it again and it worked this time.

However, the exponent status page now looks like this:

Code:
Exponent  Status           Data  
50378749  No factors below 2^64 
          History          no factor from 2^68 to 2^69 by "Danny Chia" on 2008-11-07
          History          no factor from 2^68 to 2^69 by "Danny Chia" on 2008-11-07
Shouldn't it say "no factor from 2^65 to 2^69" instead? The server may be thinking that no factoring has been done between 64 and 69 bits, which is not the case.

Also, I didn't get any credit for it:

Code:
CPU Name       Exponent  Result Type Received         age days Result                      GHz-Days 
Manual testing 50378749  NF          2008-11-07 21:39 0.0      no factor from 2^68 to 2^69 0.0000
Is anyone else having the same problem?

Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2008-11-07 at 21:55
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-07, 22:27   #50
EPF
 
Jun 2005

5 Posts
Default TF with factor counted as F-PM1

[Fri Nov 07 14:43:03 2008]
UID: EPF/EPF04, M48543991 has a factor: 295691936519281003567


Work Results Details

CPU Name Exponent Result Type Received age days Result GHz-Days
v4_computers 48543991 F-PM1 2008-11-07 13:53 10.7 2.5608


PrimeNet Top Trial Factoring Producers

Rank Member Name GHz-Days Attempts Successes |90day 30day 7 day 1 day
------ -------------------- ------------ -------- --------- |----- ----- ----- -----
100 EPF 75.274 34 0 | 50 27 35 1

Success = 0
EPF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-07, 23:04   #51
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2·3·773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EPF View Post
[Fri Nov 07 14:43:03 2008]
UID: EPF/EPF04, M48543991 has a factor: 295691936519281003567
I had one of those too but I assumed it was because v4 TF assignments are shown as LL. SO if a factor is found during a LL it is assuming it is a PM1 factor by mistake.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-07, 23:45   #52
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2×3×773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
Submit on the manual pages.
I did so but based on the output I believe it only gave me credit for the 69 bits part and not the 64, 65, 66, 67 oir 68 bits.
Code:
No factor lines found: 3
Processing result: M50324467 no factor from 2^66 to 2^67, Wd1: E30D4EE9
DEBUG SQL: insert_row_array(): INSERT t_stats_work_credit ( user_id, cpu_id, team_id, stats_type, attempts, successes, dt_received, source, CPU_GHz_days ) VALUES( '112', '19595', NULL, 1001, 1, 0, GETDATE(), 10, 0.29698237155935 )DEBUG SQL: table t_stats_work_credit inserted 1 row(s)Result was not needed.  TF on M50324467, sf: 66, ef: 67
CPU credit is 0.29698237155935 GHz-days.
Processing result: M50324467 no factor from 2^67 to 2^68, Wd1: E30D4EE9
Result was not needed.  TF on M50324467, sf: 67, ef: 68
CPU credit is 0.59396474311869 GHz-days.
Processing result: M50324467 no factor from 2^68 to 2^69, Wd1: E30D4EE9
DEBUG SQL: insert_row_array(): INSERT t_stats_work_credit ( user_id, cpu_id, team_id, stats_type, attempts, successes, dt_received, source, CPU_GHz_days ) VALUES( '112', '19595', NULL, 1001, 1, 0, GETDATE(), 10, 1.1879294862374 )DEBUG SQL: table t_stats_work_credit inserted 1 row(s)Result was not needed.  TF on M50324467, sf: 68, ef: 69
CPU credit is 1.1879294862374 GHz-days.
Factors found: 0
P-1 lines found: 0
LL lines found: 0
Mlucas lines found: 0
Glucas lines found: 0
ECM lines found: 0
Correction: I also got the 67 and 68 bit credit. Pretty close to 7/8 of total

Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2008-11-07 at 23:47
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-08, 15:30   #53
g0ods
 
g0ods's Avatar
 
Mar 2005
Malton, England

23×3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g0ods View Post
I upgraded a machine to 25.7 and it all seemed fine, but when it contacted the server (after a few days) to get new work, the current work exponent, (a double check), has disappeared from 'My Account | Assignments', though it still shows up under 'Summary' and also under 'CPUs'.

Will the result be rejected by the server as not needed? Or will it be accepted and credited properly?

M.
A little digging in the Exponent Status page revealed this...
Code:
23030431	No factors below	2^67
	        P-1	                B1=330000
	        Unverified LL	        AC9F8DB99600C2__ by "francesco"
	        Assigned	        Double-checking to "ANONYMOUS" on 2008-10-27
How can I get the exponent that I am working on assigned back to my account/user ID ?

Last fiddled with by g0ods on 2008-11-08 at 15:44
g0ods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-08, 15:57   #54
starrynte
 
starrynte's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
California

22×59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g0ods View Post
A little digging in the Exponent Status page revealed this...
Code:
23030431    No factors below    2^67
            P-1                    B1=330000
            Unverified LL            AC9F8DB99600C2__ by "francesco"
            Assigned            Double-checking to "ANONYMOUS" on 2008-10-27
How can I get the exponent that I am working on assigned back to my account/user ID ?
If "anonymous" is you, the only way I know of is risky, and that is: unreserving the exponent but keeping the save files, then manually reserving the exponent again. there is a chance that in the period the exponent was unreserved it could have been reassigned
starrynte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-11-08, 16:04   #55
Old man PrimeNet
 
Old man PrimeNet's Avatar
 
Jan 2003
Altitude>12,500 MSL

11001012 Posts
Default

Assignment transfers from an unlinked v4 acct to a v5 acct are viewed by PrimeNet as poaching. If the v4 acct is not linked the assignments belong to v5 user Anonymous acct. Upgrading to Prime95 25.7 in place, however, normally performs the transfer properly.
Old man PrimeNet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU upgrade chris2be8 GPU Computing 8 2015-11-14 17:05
Wiki upgrade... Xyzzy mersennewiki 3 2011-02-18 03:31
How would you upgrade this? jasong Factoring 5 2005-09-09 19:26
Please upgrade to version 1.1 xilman NFSNET Discussion 6 2004-06-17 01:24
ga-7dx upgrade crash893 Hardware 4 2002-09-26 06:27

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:32.

Tue May 18 23:32:36 UTC 2021 up 40 days, 18:13, 0 users, load averages: 1.57, 1.45, 1.60

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.