mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-10-03, 03:14   #12
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×5×1,021 Posts
Default

With the recent huge prime found on Riesel base 6, the optimum sieve depth should now be lower. When the prime is proven and submitted, I'll post the new depth here. My guess is that it will still come in somewhere between 40T and 45T.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-03, 11:30   #13
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31·67 Posts
Default

Taking 35-39T.
Flatlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-03, 12:31   #14
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31×67 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
Taking 35-39T.
ETA 7th Oct
Flatlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-03, 14:42   #15
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×5×1,021 Posts
Default

I'll remove k=78959 from the posted sieve file later today. Chris, you may want to do that before starting. Thanks for helping out! If the optimum depth turns out to be P=45T, when my range finishes in a couple of days, I'll reserve the rest and put 2 cores on it to finish it up in ~5-6 days after that.

I'll post the new optimum depth when I update file later today.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-03, 21:03   #16
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,127 Posts
Default

I'll do 39-43T.
The latest sr2sieve? 1.8.11?
I am trying both 1.8.10 and .11. Both work well. ETA Oct 7
39004844249663 | 51017*6^964687-1
41003460163933 | 51017*6^862123-1
...

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2009-10-03 at 21:25 Reason: (tests)
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-03, 23:22   #17
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
I'll do 39-43T.
The latest sr2sieve? 1.8.11?
I am trying both 1.8.10 and .11. Both work well. ETA Oct 7
39004844249663 | 51017*6^964687-1
41003460163933 | 51017*6^862123-1
...
As I recall, 1.8.10 is supposed to be a wee bit faster for sieves containing 5 or more sequences, so you should probably use that for this sieve.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-04, 00:06   #18
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

9,127 Posts
Default

The speeds are within 0.2-0.5%. In fact sometimes .11 is faster.

P.S. I think that posting a not-additionally-sieved file for the 500-550K range for PRP testing would be useful for someone.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-04, 06:10   #19
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×5×1,021 Posts
Default

The adjusted optimum sieve depth for breaking off n=500K-750K is P=42T. Calculation:

Testing time of an n=675K candidate (70% of 500K-750K n-range): 6282 secs.

Factor removal rate for the remaining 6 k's at P=32T: 4807 secs.

Optimum sieve depth: 6282 / 4807 * 32T = ~42T.

Therefore, all needed ranges are now reserved. Batalov, if you only want to do P=39T-42T instead of 39T-43T, that will be sufficient. Thanks for the extra boost.

I have now updated the sieve file in the 1st posting here to remove k=78959.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-10-04 at 06:16
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-04, 06:16   #20
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×5×1,021 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
P.S. I think that posting a not-additionally-sieved file for the 500-550K range for PRP testing would be useful for someone.
With k=78959 removed, all needed sieving ranges have been reserved and should be complete in < 4 days. Would you like to start on n=500K-550K with a 32T sieve depth now? If so, I can post it in the 1st posting here. Doing that would only be slightly less efficient than waiting on sieving up to 42T or 43T to finish.

The only thing we're asking is that people finish their ranges in < ~2 weeks. Keep in mind that n>500K ranges will contain all remaining 6 k's whereas the n=370K-500K range only contained 4 k's since Lennart had already completed 3 of them.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-10-04 at 07:25
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-05, 11:41   #21
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2·5·1,021 Posts
Default

P=32T-35T is complete.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-05, 17:50   #22
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

100011101001112 Posts
Default

39-43T complete. 110 factors, expected 102.88.
Attached Files
File Type: zip factors39-43T.zip (1.5 KB, 72 views)
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Riesel base 6 - team drive #4 - EIGHT OR BUST! gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 401 2015-05-27 15:15
Riesel base 16 - team drive #2 gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 213 2014-02-26 09:35
Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=1M-2M gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 40 2011-01-22 08:10
Sieving Riesel & Sierp base 16 gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 13 2009-12-14 09:23
Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 199 2009-09-30 18:44

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:43.

Thu Oct 1 18:43:45 UTC 2020 up 21 days, 15:54, 0 users, load averages: 2.08, 1.95, 1.89

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.