20150109, 00:48  #1 
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
2230_{8} Posts 
Fast Breeding (guru management)
These two Fibonacci numbers were suggested by Batalov a few months ago, they can still be sieved:
Fib(1405) C235 x^4+3x^2+1 xL281 SNFS difficulty = 234.6 Fib(1415) C236 x^4+3x^2+1 xL283 SNFS difficulty = 236.2 Both have survived enough ECM (17769 curves @110M by B.Kelly). Last fiddled with by VictordeHolland on 20150109 at 00:53 
20150109, 01:58  #2 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2^{3}·11·23 Posts 
Those are both on my list of potential candidates. I just skipped them for now since I haven't looked at the parameters for a quartic in a while. As quartics, I think they are more appropriate for 15e.
Last fiddled with by frmky on 20150109 at 01:59 
20150110, 04:18  #3 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2^{3}×11×23 Posts 
Looking at the list of remaining Fib/Luc numbers in range of 15e, after the current batch we have 1 quintic (L1397), 16 quartics (F1405, F1415, and 14 Lucas numbers from L2645A to L2855A/B), and 7 GNFS (F2145, F2163, F1585, L2037, L1502, L1583, and L1541). I'll need to look up those quartic parameters again soon.

20150116, 23:49  #4 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·5^{2}·127 Posts 
A bit worried
Does
Code:
C170_5748_1537 Aliquot GNFS(170) 32 20120 M 42.17 % 3371 2534 0 0 ... Tom Womack mean I've got the polynomial file somehow wrong? Could someone competent have a look at it? 
20150117, 00:35  #5 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
1000111110011_{2} Posts 
I see a lot of blocks completed but I don't see on the server where the relations are saved. C170_5748_1537 folder is empty.
Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 20150117 at 00:38 
20150117, 14:30  #6 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2·3·7·71 Posts 

20150117, 14:32  #7 
Sep 2009
977 Posts 
The update script probably went bellyup in a persistent way again. This occurs once in a while.

20150123, 19:37  #8 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2·5^{2}·127 Posts 
The statistics issue appears to have been resolved. I have added a few more Q to some of the 14e numbers, but GW_7_288 is ready for linear algebra now.

20150127, 09:54  #9 
Sep 2009
977 Posts 
Feeding the Beast (queue management)
The 14e queue is currently low, so I've queued a relatively easy (SNFS 233) nearrepdigit number, though not started it yet.
Rich Dickerson recently suggested the 7103^611 and 7331^611 OP numbers, SNFS difficulty 235, on which at least 10K curves at B1=43e6 were performed. I'm hereby reserving both. It's been a while since we did OP numbers We still have several GCW numbers suitable for 14e, don't we ? 
20150127, 10:17  #10 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×5^{2}×127 Posts 
I'm not anticipating queuing anything for a while: my polynomialselection resources are all devoted to 114!+1 and it will be a week or so before I have a polynomial. It looks as if yoyo@home has thoroughly ECMed several GCW numbers, I'll leave the choice and enqueuing for those up to xilman.
I have asked yoyo@home to do substantial ECM on the three XYYXF C17x cofactors with highest SNFS:GNFS difficulty ratio, and will feed those (at least one to 14e, probably two, possibly three) once the ECM is done and I've found a polynomial. 
20150129, 00:31  #11 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
14316_{8} Posts 
I've put the two mentioned OPN numbers on; it would be good if xilman or someone could put up some more GCW, otherwise the queue will drain quite fast.
I had a look at GC_11_239, but it's too big for 14e. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
System management notes  kriesel  kriesel  6  20190522 19:37 
Improving the queue management.  debrouxl  NFS@Home  10  20180506 21:05 
Scriptbased Primenet assignment management  ewmayer  Software  3  20170525 04:02 
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast  there is no question!)  jasong  jasong  35  20161211 00:57 
Power Management settings  PrimeCroat  Hardware  3  20040217 19:11 