![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
64510 Posts |
![]()
Hi Math People
Many of you may not know what prime constellations are. They are a subset of the k-tuples. Please see this reference. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeConstellation.html Also, I have written a webpage regarding Prime Constellations. https://sites.google.com/site/primeconstellations/ Additionally Tony forbes has written a webpage http://primerecords.dk/constellations.htm Hurray for Dana. Dana has written a software that will find prime numbers in prime constellations. He has made a list that is part of the Online Encyclopedia Of Integer Sequences (OEIS). See for example http://oeis.org/A213601 a list of 12-tuplets. The search software has been released. It is just not advertised the right way. Can someone point me to a software that runs on windows64 and can list prime numbers that are in k-tuple patterns? I want to augment the OEIS more. Regards Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
20C016 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
38A16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Strawberry Perl plus download of latest code with the included cpan command suffices to use my software on Win64, including the threaded example script that will use all your cores. Alternately I could write a 20 line main() that read the parameters and called the function without using Perl -- I would just need something to compile as a static binary. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26·131 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
11100010102 Posts |
![]()
Using the 2310*i+997 to select and checking isprime for the constellation comes up at 6778 times slower than my program on a single thread. You need to expand your solution set from just "I can use parfor!". Bigger primorials will help, plus sieving. As for parselect, we don't want to generate all the primes and filter them. We'll be running to 1e23 or so at some point. The set of acceptable residues is much less dense than the primes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
100000110000002 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22·7·331 Posts |
![]()
There is nothing more dangerous than little knowledge, sm88. A person can juggle jargon without understanding it for all day long (and even create a feeling in bystanders that a meaningful conversation is going on), but you should stop talking for a minute and listen to what DanaJ is saying. He is saying that thinking that simply calling parfor is a meaningless.
Saying that "I can use parfor!" is the same as the proverbial example of getting 40 virgins to produce a child in 1 week, or claiming that to build a house in 1 minute you only need 36 thousand hammers and strike them all at once. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
3×5×43 Posts |
![]()
Hi Math People
Thank you for your comments. I will repeat my request. I would like an executable program that will be able to find prime constellations. Private message me and I may be willing to pay money $. Regards Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Mike"
Aug 2002
794610 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
3×5×43 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
3·5·43 Posts |
![]()
Hi Mersenneforum,
Attached are probably my last efforts on prime constellation mathematics. Regards, Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! | dabaichi | News | 571 | 2020-10-26 11:02 |
Prime Constellations | MattcAnderson | MattcAnderson | 119 | 2018-03-14 20:22 |
Prime constellations? | CRGreathouse | Software | 10 | 2017-07-14 09:45 |
disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD? | emily | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-03-01 05:49 |
The 40th known Mersenne prime, 220996011-1 is not PRIME! | illman-q | Miscellaneous Math | 33 | 2004-09-19 05:02 |