mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Riesel Prime Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-10-14, 14:43   #430
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

11·71 Posts
Default

Note that k=733 has been searched to 5M in 2015/2016.

Still have the LLR residues of it. In rieselprime i see it listed under nplb drive14 (MR3).
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-14, 20:56   #431
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7·11·137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diep View Post
Note that k=733 has been searched to 5M in 2015/2016.

Still have the LLR residues of it. In rieselprime i see it listed under nplb drive14 (MR3).
Can you provide links to the postings where this testing was done? Alternatively posting the residues would be sufficient.

That will give us the best history for updating the Wiki.

NPLB tests all k's in the k=301-1001 range so k=733 becomes a double-check.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-14, 21:03   #432
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

30D16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Can you provide links to the postings where this testing was done? Alternatively posting the residues would be sufficient.

That will give us the best history for updating the Wiki.

NPLB tests all k's in the k=301-1001 range so k=733 becomes a double-check.
Yes - as you can see from my 2015 posting. I took k=733 then and tested it until into 2016. Just have been checking on my computer. Seems a couple of hundreds weren't run yet (nearby 5M). Finishing those at a handful of cores now.

All other residues are there it seems. Where can i upload them to?
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-14, 21:19   #433
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

293516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diep View Post
Yes - as you can see from my 2015 posting. I took k=733 then and tested it until into 2016. Just have been checking on my computer. Seems a couple of hundreds weren't run yet (nearby 5M). Finishing those at a handful of cores now.

All other residues are there it seems. Where can i upload them to?
I see this posting where you reserved it:
https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...&postcount=293

I don't see any posts where you gave status reports. Were there any? We will update the Wiki to show the whole history.

When you are done with your testing you can attach a file of residues to a posting here. It's a low-weight k so I think a zipped version of the file will be within the site's attachment size requirement.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2021-10-14 at 21:21
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-14, 21:51   #434
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

11×71 Posts
Default

No worries - i'll give a status update when it finished 5M.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 22:30   #435
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

11×71 Posts
Default

k=32767 - searched to 7M. continuing (sieved it to 30M and will continue sieving it further as removal rate still was ok though electricity costs $$$ - will fire up box in office in winter as office may not drop under 15 celcius for equipment and epoxies and other stuff here, very accurate bearings huh and gas price is becoming 1.30 euro a m^3 now for heating so better use electricity!)

With LLR 3.8.23 gwnum 29.8 i've had quite some errors (which then trigger of course a fft-size increase) searching it. Not very happy about those errors. Intend to test out LLR2 here a little and will decide whether i give it a shot at it later on. With the gerbicz turned on of course if it has it.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 23:46   #436
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

11000011012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Side note on Diep's search of k=32767: Per this posting:
https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...&postcount=385

He began sieving/testing at n=5M. So n=5M-7M is complete and there is a testing gap for n=1M-5M for this k.
Why do you post this nonsense? I said searched 'until' 7m.
Of course i started at zero there.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 23:51   #437
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

7·11·137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diep View Post
Why do you post this nonsense? I said searched 'until' 7m.
Of course i started at zero there.

My apologies. The post that I linked to gave the impression that you only sieved n=5M-30M. I will delete it.
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-17, 23:59   #438
diep
 
diep's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
The Netherlands

11·71 Posts
Default

Aha i see - your Ingliz understanding is not so 'great'.

"right now" in that old posting means the break even point shifted.

So after initial sieving of [2m - 30m] as i had already tested up until 2m with a small sieve - the break even point shifted for testing versus sieving. So i started testing until 4m and then sieved [4m - 30m]. Then when break even point shifted again - i started testing 4m-5m and started sieving 5m-30m.

Right now would still continue sieving [7m-30m] because the machine that would sieve when it is cold here, it's not so fast in testing.
diep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-10-18, 20:18   #439
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

3,929 Posts
Default k=23

We would like to reserve k=23 from n=5,000,000 under "Underwood et al"
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-11-03, 02:52   #440
Happy5214
 
Happy5214's Avatar
 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

52×31 Posts
Default

(Note to mods: still not clear if this is the right thread. Please confirm.)

As of November 1, the (near-)Woodall k's listed in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=363 have been completed to n=575k. Four primes were found. I'll just dump them in a code block since I don't feel like creating a symlink with the txt extension.

Code:
1183953 555344
1183953 559022
8508301 567213
667071 574638
Happy5214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Work for Finding Primes Unregistered Information & Answers 9 2012-06-24 13:50
Which settings to choose for best work? jmb1982 Software 2 2009-04-07 09:33
Help test 210885 - Find a new top 5000 prime! SlashDude Riesel Prime Search 121 2008-01-03 08:47
Help test 2995125705 - Find a new top 5000 prime! SlashDude Riesel Prime Search 538 2007-05-08 01:42
The fastest way to a top-5000 prime? lsoule 15k Search 13 2005-09-19 20:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:55.


Sun Nov 28 05:55:17 UTC 2021 up 128 days, 24 mins, 0 users, load averages: 1.23, 1.04, 1.01

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.