20201029, 17:23  #485 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
3^{2}·5^{2}·11 Posts 
It need time to get all the info. It is now listed as a TF find

20201029, 17:47  #486  
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
3187_{10} Posts 
Quote:
I'll guess that you looked at the exponent page immediately (at least same day) after having found the factor. Newlydiscovered factors are added to the database every hour (from the Recently Cleared list), but details about whodidwhatwhen only get imported overnight (~12am UTC). The exponent pages at mersenne.ca are heavily cached, so if you're not seeing it in your browser, try CtrlF5 to forciblyrefresh the page and the result should show up for you. 

20201029, 18:12  #487  
Sep 2020
Germany
5 Posts 
Quote:
Thanks for the explanation. That might very well have happened in the way you described. Now it is also displayed for me. Last fiddled with by Flaukrotist on 20201029 at 18:54 

20201113, 18:44  #488 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
C73_{16} Posts 

20201125, 02:36  #489 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
3187_{10} Posts 
There is some unexpected data in the nightly PrimeNet export, waiting for Aaron to fix, stats and such will be delayed.
edit: Fixed now. Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 20201125 at 03:35 
20201125, 22:28  #490 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
3,187 Posts 
Putting the site in the shortterm suspended state while I apply a database change. Should only be a few minutes (... I think)
edit: and we should be back. Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 20201125 at 22:33 
20201126, 01:41  #491 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
exNorthern Ontario
3,187 Posts 
For those who use the Worst P1 tool, the calculations have changed. Previously the P1 probability was calculated as being done after the TF which has been done on the exponent. The problem with this is that if an exponent has had abnormallyhigh TF then the apparent probability for the P1 drops very low, even though it was done to reasonable bounds. The new calculation is done as assuming TF was done to GIMPSstandard, which makes it easier to find P1 that was actually badlydone and should no longer falsely report an exponent is a candidate for a better P1 when the first P1 run was fine but also had veryhigh TF.
This will mostly affect the lowest exponents that have had considerable factoring effort of all types, but it will also impact the "expected" values for what makes a good P1 or not. As a rough approximation, where you say 2% before would be a rough analog to 5% in the new system. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Small inconsistencies between mersenne.org and mersenne.ca factor databases  GP2  mersenne.ca  44  20160619 19:29 
mersenne.ca (ex mersennearies.sili.net)  LaurV  mersenne.ca  8  20131125 21:01 
GaussianMersenne & EisensteinMersenne primes  siegert81  Math  2  20110919 17:36 
Mersenne Wiki: Improving the mersenne primes web site by FOSS methods  optim  PrimeNet  13  20040709 13:51 