mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > FactorDB

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-06-18, 22:31   #34
Jayder
 
Jayder's Avatar
 
Dec 2012

4268 Posts
Default

This is exasperating. msc_ngb added this 16,386 digit prime and then added all 1900 steps. About 160 are above 15,000 digits, 540 between 10-15k digits, and about 540 between 5-10k digits. There are 1354 certificates in the queue right now, and the vast majority of them are just these "steps". I feel like this is a humongous waste of resources.
Jayder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-19, 15:21   #35
Jayder
 
Jayder's Avatar
 
Dec 2012

27810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayder View Post
I feel like this is a humongous waste of resources.
It looks like this may have been rectified, at least for the moment. msc_nbg's total certificates dropped by about 30k, and the queue is now clear. Looks like they were all deleted. Thanks Syd(?)! Hope this lasts.
Jayder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-21, 23:25   #36
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

317610 Posts
Default As info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayder View Post
Maybe not worth mentioning, but this seems to still be an issue. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

The helper files seem fine and I can prove it fine myself with pfgw, but I guess the database still has a hard time with lots and lots of factors.
Even with the latest enhancements and checks-and-balances, these are still an issue.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-06-25, 20:48   #37
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

1100011010002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wblipp View Post
I still find this argument compelling. It might be possible to convince me to support a database modification that stored the one certificate and tagged all the primes as proven by that one certificate.
I agree. If someone would request the certificate of one of the steps (primes) tagged, then the database could easily build the cert from the remaining steps.

Then again, if Syd only had the time.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-07-03, 14:30   #38
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

23×397 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayder View Post
... but this seems to still be an issue. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
The Proof button now works for the above six. All are proven prime via N-1.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-07-18, 14:54   #39
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

100100011002 Posts
Default

This number is broken (see the last factor):

http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00000305397690
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-07-18, 16:09   #40
chris2be8
 
chris2be8's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

2·971 Posts
Default

It looks OK to me. The last divisor is a p110 raised to power 33. Which look a bit odd the first time you see it but is OK.

The next question is how long it will be until someone factors the next-to-last-factor C92.

Chris
chris2be8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-07-18, 16:12   #41
wblipp
 
wblipp's Avatar
 
"William"
May 2003
New Haven

44448 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
This number is broken (see the last factor):

http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00000305397690
Perhaps this has been fixed. As of my writing, the factordb shows the last factor as a 110 digit prime raised to the 33rd power. Alpertron agrees that factorization.
wblipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-07-18, 23:37   #42
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

22×3×97 Posts
Default

It must have been a glitch. I was factoring the C92 at the time and I like to look at the entire number.
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-08-17, 16:15   #43
chris2be8
 
chris2be8's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

2×971 Posts
Default

The list of smallest numbers without known factors contains the following 3 entries:
Code:
1100000000704879936 	0 	1
1100000000704879961 	0 	1
1100000000704879980 	0 	1
Clicking on the 0 shows they are all 7##-7##.

I think this needs SYD to intervene.

Chris
chris2be8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-08-17, 16:56   #44
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

217048 Posts
Default

The ## parsing has been broken in FactorDB for a while and is till broken.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A suggestion for factordb. enzocreti FactorDB 0 2018-03-02 09:12
Extending Factordb carpetpool FactorDB 6 2017-01-23 11:04
FactorDB PRP's smh FactorDB 231 2015-07-28 02:30
bugged sequence in factordb firejuggler Aliquot Sequences 2 2010-06-15 14:03
FactorDB question Raman Factoring 15 2010-01-28 10:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:13.

Wed Nov 25 17:13:05 UTC 2020 up 76 days, 14:24, 3 users, load averages: 1.80, 1.83, 1.80

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.