20201029, 07:06  #1 
Apr 2012
2·5^{2}·7 Posts 
J.H.Conway 1 is prime
Years ago I had some results which pointed to 1 as a prime number. This was done in a logically consistent manner and the only logical break would be to consider it otherwise. At the time I researched this question and had copied the contents of the newsgroup discussion which this (now broken) link pointed to:
"Date: 10/21/2000 at 03:33:50 From: Doctor Floor Subject: Re: Is 1 Prime? Dear Tom, I read the discussion you had with Dr. Peterson. Indeed it is true that in the usual definition of a prime, the prime is supposed to be a positive integer, or natural number. However, there are people, and not the least, who do consider 1 to be a prime. Professor John Conway of Princeton is one of them. Although I don't suppose it is desirable to have this in high school textbooks, I would like to point you to a newsgroup discussion thread about this subject: 1 as a Prime (geometryresearch, Math Forum) http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=1093170 A lot of this thread is useless, but the first (and later) messages by John Conway do explain why he considers 1 a prime, and why this is useful in his opinion. I hope you appreciate this addition. Best regards,  Doctor Floor, The Math Forum http://mathforum.org/dr.math/ " I no longer have this record of Dr. Conway's justification and was wondering if anyone does..in some way, shape or form. Does anyone have an example of an "arithmetic contradiction" if 1 is considered prime? Do any mathematics get broken (or fixed)? 
20201029, 07:56  #2 
Jun 2003
4777_{10} Posts 
Unique factorization will be broken if 1 is considered a prime. Just like 1 is given a special status of "unit", 1 should be given a special status and leave it at that, rather than trying to shoehorn it into existing framework.

20201029, 12:54  #3 
Feb 2017
Nowhere
3786_{10} Posts 
Euclid used number to mean an integer greater than 1, while 1 was the unit. Thus, a prime number was by definition greater than 1.
If you want to bring negative numbers into the picture, the obvious generalization is that of an ideal. However, in any ring R, the ideal (1) generated by 1 is the whole ring R. The only context involving "primes" that comes to mind in which sign comes into play, is with a usage of "prime" related to what are called "valuations." If is a number field, an embedding into the complex numbers is an "infinite prime," and an embedding is a "real infinite prime." There is a concept of "multiplicative congruences" which is used in class field theory. They are expressed where M is a "modulus" consisting of a integral ideal (an ideal in the ring of algebraic integers of ) and, possibly, a set of "real infinite primes" of . It includes the convention that, if is a "real infinite prime" of , the notation means that in the embedding defined by , . With the rational integers , this allows a distinction between prime ideals having (say) a generator congruent to 1 (mod 4), and those with a positive generator congruent to 1 (mod 4). If p is any odd prime, (p) has a generator congruent to 1 (mod 4) since either p or p is congruent to 1 (mod 4). But (p) only has a positive generator congruent to 1 (mod 4) when p is a prime number congruent to 1 (mod 4). That's not anything like "1 is a prime number," but it's as close as I can get with the math I am familiar with. 
20201029, 17:52  #4 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
1001001011110_{2} Posts 
Don't have to know much math to know 1 is more special than the garden variety prime, as are 1 and 0.

20201029, 22:26  #5  
Apr 2012
2·5^{2}·7 Posts 
Quote:
For pragmatic purposes, I try to understand how certain people think and have thought since all of mathematics (in the most general sense) was and is created by human thought. As an analogy to [one of] my assessments of questions like the subject of this thread, I specialized in mountain combat years ago (jungle and desert as well) and the following link describes a problem and an approach: https://www.livius.org/sources/conte...sogdianrock/ (the episode on Ancient Assassins is more graphic). You need to have " lots of skin in the game" , awareness of the situation and the imagination to cope and excel..in some ways like poker as well..belief systems play a major part. I hope my oblique response makes it clear that I dismiss your premise and conclusion and that your assessment of my approach wasn't ever a consideration. Axn, you're obviously aware of the Riemann Hypothesis as am I (I was corrected within this forum regarding the RH by an astute member who caught my mistake in a prior post which is why I like this forum.) so I have a question for you that relates to the thread subject, "What is your interpretation of the "1/2 + i" within Riemann's expression? Sardonicus, thanks for your analysis. As always, it's very well thought out. Cheers. As an afterthought, here is a link to a YouTube video and a proper preparation to this type is thinking is reviewing all of Ramanujan's notebooks and possibly some of his early published papers on Bernoulli numbers... Many of the papers I had collected over the years have been lost but memory and a rebuilt virtual library do help. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcKRGpMiVTw Last fiddled with by jwaltos on 20201030 at 00:24 Reason: Afterthought 

20201030, 02:22  #6 
Aug 2006
13462_{8} Posts 
In number theory it's all a matter of definition, of course. But in abstract algebra this is life or death  you have lots of groups, rings, fields, etc. with units and it's important to agree on what precisely they are, and it's certainly not the case that (1) all objects have units or that (2) all units are 1 [in rings and fields, where such notion makes sense].
By any reasonable algebraic definition, 1 and 1 are units and neither is prime or irreducible. (Yes, in the integers, every prime is irreducible, but that's not true in general.) 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
(M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED!  dabaichi  News  571  20201026 11:02 
How does one prove that a mersenne prime found with CUDALucas is really prime?  ICWiener  Software  38  20180609 13:59 
Twin Prime Days, Prime Day Clusters  cuBerBruce  Puzzles  3  20141201 18:15 
disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD?  emily  PrimeNet  3  20130301 05:49 
Prime Cullen Prime, Rest in Peace  hhh  Prime Cullen Prime  4  20070921 16:34 