mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2005-01-25, 22:11   #23
geoff
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
New Zealand

13×89 Posts
Default

Robert, could you make available a list of the primes you found for n <= 18468? Or if you email it to me ( geoff AT hisplace DOT co DOT nz ) I will make it available.

I will keep a list of primes that make the top 5000 list in http://www.geocities.com/g_w_reynold...ki5/champs.txt, there is just one entry so far.

My results: I found (a while ago) that 32518*5^47330+1 is prime.
I am reserving these k: 10918, 12988, 31712.

Last fiddled with by geoff on 2005-01-25 at 22:15
geoff is offline  
Old 2005-01-28, 06:31   #24
michaf
 
michaf's Avatar
 
Jan 2005

479 Posts
Default

Hello all,

I agree with uncwilly that this project should deserve it's
own private place... anyone know how to move it?

In the meantime:

One more down:

PFGW Version 20041020.Win_Stable (v1.2 RC1c) [FFT v23.8]

Primality testing 42004*5^27992+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge]
Running N-1 test using base 2
Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 99.98%
42004*5^27992+1 is prime! (57.0569s+0.0044s)
michaf is offline  
Old 2005-01-30, 12:42   #25
michaf
 
michaf's Avatar
 
Jan 2005

1DF16 Posts
Default Yet another one down

Hi all,

4th prime on here:

PFGW Version 20041020.Win_Stable (v1.2 RC1c) [FFT v23.8]

Primality testing 44134*5^39614+1 [N-1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge]
Running N-1 test using base 7
Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 99.98%
44134*5^39614+1 is prime! (150.2650s+0.0062s)

Cheers, Micha
michaf is offline  
Old 2005-01-31, 20:28   #26
ltd
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Apr 2003

22·193 Posts
Default

Hi,

here my newest results:
60124*5^38286+1 is prime!

60394 tested to 50166 ( i keep this reserved)
60722 tested to 49329 ( i keep this reserved)

I also keep my other k reserved.

Lars
ltd is offline  
Old 2005-02-01, 02:13   #27
geoff
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
New Zealand

115710 Posts
Default

The primes.txt file in http://www.geocities.com/g_w_reynolds/Sierpinski5/ contains the k,n pairs for all the primes k*5^n+1 found so far. It can be used as input to Proth.exe in file mode, or by adding 'ABC $a*5^$b+1' to the top, as input to pfgw.
geoff is offline  
Old 2005-02-01, 18:01   #28
robert44444uk
 
robert44444uk's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

7·271 Posts
Default Nought

This may come to nought, actually no, it will come to k+1

What am I talking about? n=0 ---> k*5^0+1= k+1

Therefore any k still remaining where k+1 is prime can be eliminated, unless that is not in the Sierpinski rule book. Looking at my original list, this would eliminate 7528 and maybe others....not got a list of primes to hand

What does this group think of this wheeze?

Regards

Robert Smith
robert44444uk is offline  
Old 2005-02-01, 21:09   #29
robert44444uk
 
robert44444uk's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

7·271 Posts
Default n=0

Following on, now I am home:

From the original list n=0 eliminates (and a number of these we have found already higher primes or prp for):

7528
15802
33358
43018
51460
81700
82486
90676
102196
105166
123406
123910
143092
152836
159706

Regards

Robert Smith
robert44444uk is offline  
Old 2005-02-01, 22:35   #30
geoff
 
geoff's Avatar
 
Mar 2003
New Zealand

115710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert44444uk
Therefore any k still remaining where k+1 is prime can be eliminated, unless that is not in the Sierpinski rule book.
The definitions of Sierpinski number that I have seen take n to be positive, e.g. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sierpin...erTheorem.html, so I think we should leave these k in the list. (If they turn out to be harder than the other k then we could reconsider :-)
geoff is offline  
Old 2005-02-02, 14:01   #31
pcco74
 
Feb 2005
Pittsburgh

3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff
The definitions of Sierpinski number that I have seen take n to be positive, e.g. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sierpin...erTheorem.html, so I think we should leave these k in the list. (If they turn out to be harder than the other k then we could reconsider :-)
Yves Gallot's site also lists n as having to be greater than or equal to one. http://www.prothsearch.net/sierp.html
pcco74 is offline  
Old 2005-02-02, 18:10   #32
Citrix
 
Citrix's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

32×52×7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcco74
Yves Gallot's site also lists n as having to be greater than or equal to one. http://www.prothsearch.net/sierp.html
This is for base 2 only, 5^0 should be considered too.
Citrix is online now  
Old 2005-02-02, 19:10   #33
robert44444uk
 
robert44444uk's Avatar
 
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK

7·271 Posts
Default Odds and evens

I posted the following message on Yahoo primenumbers to see whether one of the maths bods can give an answer. I am reasonably confident we should allow n=0

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/primen.../message/16018

Regards

Robert Smith
robert44444uk is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sierpinski and Riesel number (Fixed k, Variable base) Citrix Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 16 2017-02-09 15:55
Definition of Sierpinski/Riesel number base b sweety439 Conjectures 'R Us 32 2016-12-16 22:31
Sierpinski/Riesel Base 10 rogue Conjectures 'R Us 11 2007-12-17 05:08
Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 23 michaf Conjectures 'R Us 2 2007-12-17 05:04
Sierpinski / Riesel - Base 22 michaf Conjectures 'R Us 49 2007-12-17 05:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:52.

Sat Oct 24 23:52:32 UTC 2020 up 44 days, 21:03, 1 user, load averages: 1.60, 1.76, 1.79

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.