![]() |
![]() |
#1398 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
274316 Posts |
![]()
It's David, actually.
"[I [B]am[/B] serious]...and stop calling me Shirley" (c) Airplane. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1399 |
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·3·937 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1400 |
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
3·541 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1401 |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
1005110 Posts |
![]()
That is exactly right! It. (Because it is not the users who write those
As the old Soviet joke goes, "In ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1402 |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
37·163 Posts |
![]()
It is all tests by me since tests were removed last time.
I am pretty certain 99+% of them are perfectly good. In fact I suspect I may be stable apart from when using hardware decoding(very rare). I have run several days stress testing and a successful gimps double check. I would imagine it is more stable than some who have submitted pairs during races with distributed computing routes(overclocked pcs etc). How accurate do we need? I would be very interested in knowing the results of a doublecheck of the results returned by this pc. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1403 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10B716 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1404 |
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
![]()
617*2^1451432-1 is prime!
The Prime Pages site warned me when I submitted that at the current rate primes are being added, this will be pushed off the list in about 40-50 or so weeks. Has anyone run the numbers to make sure we're staying ahead of that curve? (Ports 2000 and 9000 are tracking pretty close in n right now and have similar resources on them, so they'll both be in the same boat.) If need be, I can shift some resources over from CRUS 1400 to give one or both ports a boost. Right now I have 1 Haswell on 2000, and 4 more on 1400 (+2 Nehalems, but they don't count for much these days so I wouldn't bother moving them). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1405 | |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2E0F16 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1406 |
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
12348 Posts |
![]()
I expect it to be longer than that.
On the "Drive Progress" chart, the red line shows the lower limit of the top 5000. It is is updated daily based on an update from the top 5000 page. It is actually a complex curve but it looks fairly straight on this scale. Also on the "Prime List" page you will see the second line of the description currently says "Last updated minimum size for the Top5000 database is 388342 digits." This number of digits of the smallest prime in the top 5000 is updated daily at the same time as the red line on the chart. HTH Last fiddled with by AMDave on 2017-04-24 at 05:16 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1407 | |
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
19×232 Posts |
![]() Quote:
_______________ "We choose to go to the |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report top-5000 primes here | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1061 | 2023-01-21 20:38 |
Report top-5000 primes for k=1003-3000 | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 688 | 2020-04-24 07:31 |
All top 5000 primes will have the same number of digits in 2014 ;-) | Batalov | Conjectures 'R Us | 10 | 2013-03-29 01:29 |
Twenty Oldest Primes on Top 5000 List | masser | Lounge | 9 | 2008-08-27 12:31 |
get all the 5000 biggest primes above 100K digits | jasong | jasong | 1 | 2007-06-09 22:51 |