mersenneforum.org Working on the 28,000,000-30,000,000 range
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2014-02-02, 21:27 #177 tha     Dec 2002 25·33 Posts I have added 29838439 and 30300539 to my worktodo file. The first one is 97.5% complete according to the server report but it may or may not finish this year. The second one does not seem to have started working on DC yet, while it took two months to do some factoring as it appears to me. The other 9 exponents still out appear to be finished by their owners soon.
2014-02-10, 23:01   #178
tha

Dec 2002

25·33 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by tha I have added 29838439 and 30300539 to my worktodo file.
29838439 is still where it has been for quite some time now. My pc is about to finish it on February 16. The other exponent has been finished by its original owner, so I discarded the work I did on that one.

2014-02-11, 22:47   #179
Brian-E

"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

2·11·149 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by tha 29838439 is still where it has been for quite some time now. My pc is about to finish it on February 16. The other exponent has been finished by its original owner, so I discarded the work I did on that one.
You're being refreshingly open and honest about your continuing activities and this near accident. Kudos!

Given that there has recently been a major implementation of new assignment and recycling rules, probably thanks in part to your initiative and the discussion it generated, are you now considering stopping this poaching in the near future?

N.B.:
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Prime95 The server applied the new rules for recycling DC assignments in the top 1500. Assignments over a year old and < 60% complete were recycled. Assignments over a year-and-a-half old were recycled. The actual SQL query was: Code:  ((dt_when_assigned < '2014-03-01' AND -- Grandfathered assignment exponent < @exp1 AND -- exponent is in the most critical category dt_when_assigned < DATEADD (DAY, -365, GETDATE()) AND -- and assignment is over a year old percent_done < 60 + (DATEDIFF (DAY, dt_when_assigned, GETDATE()) - 365) / 3) OR -- plus a grace period if close to finished

2014-02-12, 09:06   #180
tha

Dec 2002

86410 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Brian-E Given that there has recently been a major implementation of new assignment and recycling rules, probably thanks in part to your initiative and the discussion it generated, are you now considering stopping this poaching in the near future?
I started this in the old v4 days. At that time 'cleaning up the mess' was really needed. I stopped when the v5 was introduced and most of the work was done automatically. After quite some time of v5 activity some cleaning up was needed, so I restarted this effort. Even if there would have been no changes made to the v5 server it wouldn't have made sense to continue poaching for the next six months, simply for lack of rubbish to clean up.

Best thing to do now, with the changes made, is to wait for a year and then evaluate the implementation of the rules. That can best be done if no manual poaching takes place during that year. So to answer your question: yes!

I do take weekly snapshots of the assignment rules page to be able to analyse how things are progressing.

 2014-02-12, 10:40 #181 Brian-E     "Brian" Jul 2007 The Netherlands 2×11×149 Posts Ah, okay. Thanks.
 2014-02-12, 11:10 #182 flashjh     "Jerry" Nov 2011 Vancouver, WA 1,123 Posts Work... It's only work if you do it
2014-02-15, 08:06   #183
Miszka

May 2013
Poland

11010102 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by tha 29838439 is still where it has been for quite some time now.
Maybe now ...
32121437
32130779
32133557
32133767
32135659
32137043
32137117
32137163
32137247
32137253
32137267
32137283
32137381
32137403
32137411
32137541
32137583
32137639
32137697
32137927
32137997
32138009
32138011
32138077
32138203
32138269
32138273
32138287
32138297
32138401
32138423
32138437
32138453
32138461
32138507
32138651
32138677
32138731
32138753
32138767
32138783
32138801
32138803
32138831
32138921
32138963
32138969

2014-02-15, 23:41   #184
tha

Dec 2002

15408 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Miszka Maybe now ...
I haven't looked at these exponents and their assignments, but as far as I am concerned, the next major milestone for double checks is M44 (M43 is in the bag save for 3 exponents) and I think it would be best if we let the new assignment rules deal with cleaning up that entire range.

If somehow the new rules aren't functioning properly it would in my opinion be best to let that come to light by doing nothing for about a year.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Dubslow Linux 3 2012-05-11 14:44 cheesehead Forum Feedback 1 2012-03-19 17:13 Dubslow Forum Feedback 2 2012-03-19 06:53 delta_t Marin's Mersenne-aries 15 2004-09-13 15:27 garo Lone Mersenne Hunters 2 2003-03-28 11:13

All times are UTC. The time now is 07:13.

Sat Jan 28 07:13:37 UTC 2023 up 163 days, 4:42, 0 users, load averages: 1.69, 1.56, 1.30

Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔