![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Aug 2006
5,987 Posts |
![]()
What's the best software for searching for prime constellations? I have constellations of the form kn + {k0, k1, ..., kj} for constants k, k0, ..., kj, where k0, ..., kj are all small (in my case, k = 23# and 1 = k0 < ... < kj < 100).
I seem to remember PFGW had a feature to do something like this, but maybe there is something more specialized? Any suggestions? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jan 2007
Germany
619 Posts |
![]()
APSieve can do that or write a own sieve. APSieve is not the fastest. What is the exact term ?
Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2017-07-13 at 00:44 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Aug 2006
598710 Posts |
![]()
Incidentally what I meant above was that kj - k0 is small, not that (say) kj is small.
Quote:
223092870n + 217153 + {0, 4, 6, 10, 16, 18, 24, 28, 30, 34, 40, 46, 48, 54, 58, 60, 66, 70, 76, 84, 88, 94, 96} |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Jan 2007
Germany
10011010112 Posts |
![]()
"223092870n + 217153 + {0, 4, 6, 10, 16, 18, 24, 28, 30, 34, 40, 46, 48, 54, 58, 60, 66, 70, 76, 84, 88, 94, 96}"
Is it an AP project ? I can send to you a link for downloading APSieve. Maybe it is useful. Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2017-07-13 at 06:19 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Jan 2007
Germany
61910 Posts |
![]()
Okay, looks like a tuplet project, but a 23 -tuplet have d=94, not 96 ?!
23 94 : 0 4 6 10 12 16 24 30 34 40 42 46 52 54 60 66 70 72 76 82 84 90 94 23 94 : 0 4 10 12 18 22 24 28 34 40 42 48 52 54 60 64 70 78 82 84 88 90 94 ( ktpatt.txt at T.Forbes site ) I wrote for my 15 tuplet a sieve. To find an example is not easy. Maybe n up to 10^30 one case. I wrote a test sieve for a 18-tuplet. No chance. All primes up to 10M into the sieve, maybe 10 n's left for PRPing in an 100 billion -n-block. BTW ,are you Mr. Stocker ? Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2017-07-13 at 11:34 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
Aug 2006
598710 Posts |
![]()
It's just something I'm doing on my own.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No, I'm some other guy. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Jan 2007
Germany
619 Posts |
![]()
Here is the download link
https://www.sendspace.com/file/idqrzc Read readme.txt , there are useful instructions. Problems, ask me. There are some bugs in APSieve.... Best |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Aug 2006
5,987 Posts |
![]()
Well, I'm running it now with
Code:
apsieve -v -npb -ex23# -b23,217153,217157,217159,217163,217169,217171,217177,217181,217183,217187,217193,217199,217201,217207,217211,217213,217219,217223,217229,217237,217241,217247,217249 -k100000000 -K4000000000 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Aug 2006
5,987 Posts |
![]()
Oh wait, this is better because it PRPs as well:
Code:
apsieve -v 134473145 4000000000 23# 23 217153 217157 217159 217163 217169 217171 217177 217181 217183 217187 217193 217199 217201 217207 217211 217213 217219 217223 217229 217237 217241 217247 217249 1000000000 Last fiddled with by CRGreathouse on 2017-07-13 at 18:56 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Jan 2007
Germany
619 Posts |
![]()
Can you find a command - line for this ?
for n=1000000 to n=10000000 , 1009# with 2 b's 16061 , 16063 and stop maxP=100000000 without PRP-Test -> so left n write APSieve in output.txt automatic Never I found a solution for this with P<2^31 . Program ever crashed. Better, reload an output.txt file , set maxP <2^31 ...and yes, 4 billion is maximum but 40 x 100 Million in order is faster via bat file Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2017-07-13 at 20:42 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Jan 2007
Germany
61910 Posts |
![]()
Found a way:
apsieve -npb -k1000000000 -K5000000000 -ex1200# -b4,16061,16063,16067,16069 -mP100000000 Stop at 100M without PRP -> write the output.txt file PRPing with PFGW is twice faster totay, so its better to start pfgwxx -f0 output.txt after sieving But reload an output.txt and set maxP < 2^31 is not possible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prime Constellations | MattcAnderson | MattcAnderson | 160 | 2022-07-18 08:34 |
(M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! | dabaichi | News | 571 | 2020-10-26 11:02 |
disk died, prime work lost forever? where to put prime? on SSD or HDD? | emily | PrimeNet | 3 | 2013-03-01 05:49 |
The 40th known Mersenne prime, 220996011-1 is not PRIME! | illman-q | Miscellaneous Math | 33 | 2004-09-19 05:02 |