mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-09-24, 23:02   #1
patrik
 
patrik's Avatar
 
"Patrik Johansson"
Aug 2002
Uppsala, Sweden

42510 Posts
Default Residue not matching due to masked bits

I just did a successful double-check of 33238477 with residue D12F51397BCA233C. There is also a bad result for this exponent with residue D12F51397BCA23__ (by Daniel Weijand, computer name C7364A0E9). It is obvious that this result is not really a bad result, but somehow the masked bits made it into the database.

I looked in some old status files that I have kept, and the result of the first test looks like
Code:
33238477,S67532,C7364A0E9,W?,
in the hrf3 file. In cleared.txt it was reported as
Code:
33238477  69     0xD12F51397BCA23__                01-Sep-03 14:16  S67532         C7364A0E9
The double check was done right after that with hrf3 line
Code:
33238477,S01167,laptop,WZ1,00000000
and
Code:
33238477  69  D  0xD12F51397BCA23__                11-Nov-03 03:17  DL             laptop
in cleared.txt.

Does anybody know what has happened?
patrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-09-24, 23:44   #2
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

2·7·563 Posts
Default

Well, from my fuzzy ancient memories....

A v4 server hiccup, the details of which I've long since forgotten about, caused some LL results to be lost -- only recoverable from a report that showed the masked bottom 8 bits.

At the time, I figured it was best to add the results to the database without valid bottom bits so that the exponents would not be handed out as first-time tests and the user received proper CPU credit.

In looking the last pre-v5 database, it looks like there were 4 such cases: 18050569,19857121,33238477,33254747
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Largest number of LL tests before matching residues achieved? sdbardwick Lounge 1 2015-02-03 15:03
Can 1227133513 be the only composite number matching the conditions? miket Math 5 2014-08-12 00:41
Three matching tests not closing exponent? Dubslow PrimeNet 8 2012-04-27 18:19
"Verified" LLs with non-matching short residues? cheesehead Data 6 2010-12-27 22:47
Masked residue schneelocke PrimeNet 6 2003-11-22 01:26

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:08.


Wed May 18 10:08:55 UTC 2022 up 34 days, 8:10, 0 users, load averages: 0.90, 1.40, 1.51

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔