mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-02-08, 22:57   #1
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

54168 Posts
Default Rejected k/n pairs

Bryan from RieselSieve project said this about the rejected pairs:

Quote:
Rejected is any k/n pair that comes back that is not either in the jobs.txt or jobs table (file vs mysql setup), whether it's too late, the server received the result, but the client did not receive the acknowledgment, the client never had the k/n pair (someone put it in, basically), or any number of reasons. Basically, the server didn't think that user should have had the k/n pair they returned.
I'm getting a bunch of rejected files from michaf and I think he should be credit for them even if others later receive the pairs to re-test. Meanwhile I increased the job prune to each two days instead of one, maybe this was the problem. Thoughts please.

Carlos

EDIT: I'm going to sleep. Just checked again the file and for the last two hours the server has been receiving all k/n pairs from michaf as rejected ones...

Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-02-08 at 23:13
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-08, 23:19   #2
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

10010100011112 Posts
Default

Golden slumbers...

Luigi
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-09, 06:47   #3
michaf
 
michaf's Avatar
 
Jan 2005

479 Posts
Default

Hmm... nothing I did wrong hopefully?
Everything looks ok here, albeit a too low prime content.
As far as I can tell from the lresults.txt file, all results have been sent successfully to the server (manual scan of it, might have missed a few)

And don't bother too much to give the credit, I don't mind being last in the race :)


Quote:
Originally Posted by em99010pepe View Post
Bryan from RieselSieve project said this about the rejected pairs:

I'm getting a bunch of rejected files from michaf and I think he should be credit for them even if others later receive the pairs to re-test. Meanwhile I increased the job prune to each two days instead of one, maybe this was the problem. Thoughts please.

Carlos

EDIT: I'm going to sleep. Just checked again the file and for the last two hours the server has been receiving all k/n pairs from michaf as rejected ones...
michaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-09, 08:32   #4
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2×5×283 Posts
Default

I really don't know what's happening. I'll tell Karsten to count the rejected files because they are good, the residues are correct.
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-09, 19:44   #5
AES
 
Jul 2007
Tennessee

10011000002 Posts
Default

michaf, may i ask which os you are running?

My results seem to be going to the rejected file as well as the lresults file. The residues all appear to be correct. I'm seeing strange client behavior in 64-bit Vista, but the results and log files are all ok.

Last fiddled with by AES on 2008-02-09 at 19:52
AES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-09, 19:58   #6
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2×5×283 Posts
Default

You both are getting rejected pairs...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AES View Post
michaf, may i ask which os you are running?
I was not receiving rejected pairs when he was running for CRUS project.

Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-02-09 at 20:12
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-10, 00:57   #7
michaf
 
michaf's Avatar
 
Jan 2005

479 Posts
Default

I have a desktop running XP-home
and a laptop running Vista Home Premium.
both running on 32bits

edit:
Hey... I just noticed that my laptop AND my desktop were crunching the SAME number:
887*2^328654-1

Any reason as why I get two of the same?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AES View Post
michaf, may i ask which os you are running?

My results seem to be going to the rejected file as well as the lresults file. The residues all appear to be correct. I'm seeing strange client behavior in 64-bit Vista, but the results and log files are all ok.

Last fiddled with by michaf on 2008-02-10 at 01:00
michaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-10, 01:21   #8
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

22×691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaf View Post
edit:
Hey... I just noticed that my laptop AND my desktop were crunching the SAME number:
887*2^328654-1

Any reason as why I get two of the same?
look up your llr-clientconfig.txt on both:
get sure they different services and guiport adresses.

compare the workfile.txt's! equal?
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-10, 10:15   #9
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

22·691 Posts
Default

all 1136 rejected k/n-pairs i got from Carlos are double work of the same user.
seems that 2 clients did same pairs and sent their results, but 2nd was rejected.

1136 pairs:
346 from AES
10 from paratima
780 from michaf

attachment contains table with:
- first 9 columns contains data from rejected file
- next comment and index from result-file
- next 8 columns data from result-file

Karsten
Attached Files
File Type: txt rejected.txt (109.9 KB, 139 views)
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-10, 10:45   #10
michaf
 
michaf's Avatar
 
Jan 2005

479 Posts
Default

I think I'm the dumb one here...
I made four dir's accessible from both my machines, each containing a llr-net
I intended to start each core in a different dir, but I apparently ended up using the same dir's twice.

If this was the problem, I'll be sending no double results from now on...

Ah well... at least we have some double-checks done then...
michaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-02-10, 11:19   #11
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2·5·283 Posts
Default

Karsten,

What about adding a column at the score table for double-check pairs?

michaf,

I already stop receiving rejected pairs. I think we all learned by your mistake.

Carlos
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Search for all amicable pairs up to 2^64 Sergei Chernykh Aliquot Sequences 37 2018-01-27 19:23
Why was this rejected? petrw1 PrimeNet 2 2015-10-01 17:11
GPU LL result rejected mdettweiler PrimeNet 4 2010-10-04 20:03
Tony Reix, I'm feeling rejected :) Prime95 Lounge 2 2007-02-26 08:05
Double-checks come in pairs? BigRed Software 1 2002-10-20 05:29

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:52.

Tue Mar 31 10:52:35 UTC 2020 up 6 days, 8:25, 0 users, load averages: 1.03, 1.15, 1.13

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.