mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Cunningham Tables

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-04-12, 05:09   #45
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

22·5·101 Posts
Default

I don't have 2,1165+ reserved. The forum is welcome to do it as a team project. If you prefer, I'm happy to run the sieving on NFS@Home. Entirely up to y'all.
frmky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 05:53   #46
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

451710 Posts
Default

I did point my cores to NFS@home, there’s a mersenneforum.org team in there.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 11:52   #47
ET_
Banned
 
ET_'s Avatar
 
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia

4,751 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
I think 2,1165+ is GNFS at C217. This would make a nice size for a forum-team-sieve, if we can round up enough CADO users willing to pledge CPU cycles.
Rather than clutter this thread, anyone interested can start a new thread for 2,1165+ specifically and we can coordinate ECM / poly select / sieve pledges / etc.
(I didn't check whether Greg already has plans for this number, it may already be reserved to NFS@home)
I could be interested as well.
ET_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 12:15   #48
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11×13×19 Posts
Default

I will help poly search for 2,1165+.
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 13:02   #49
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

2×5×67 Posts
Default C217 2,1165+ poly select

Could we please drop an intro message on https://mersenneforum.org/showthread...18368&page=159 about this C217? And post msieve/CADO and ranges for everybody involved? Thank you!
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 16:37   #50
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

76268 Posts
Default

It's not clear that 2,1165+ has been ECM'ed enough to jump into poly select.
That said, since frmky is willing to sieve it in case we don't have enough forum interest for a team sieve, we have every reason to poly select it once ECM is nearly-done.
I'm not personally up on how much ECM has been done on which Cunningham numbers; this project gets a lot of attention so I wouldn't be surprised if a t65 has already been done, but we should be sure of that before we spend cycles on poly select.

Using 0.31 * GNFS size = as a heuristic for ECM depth, we get 67.27 which is just over 2*t65. I wonder what the Bayesian tool suggests?

Mr Silverman kindly PMed me to point out that there are also 2,2210M C211, 2,2330L C207, and 2,2330M C210 as GNFS targets in the Cunningham project. I personally like 2,1165+ more than these for a forum project (for one, it ought to be degree 6 poly), but at C217 it's more than twice as hard. I'm willing to get behind whichever candidate gets best support from the forum.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 17:32   #51
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

2·5·67 Posts
Default next C200+

I would vote for 2,2330L C207. It is the smallest, it could potentially be degree 5 or degree 6 for the poly, and we already have a goal for the poly score from two years ago on 5- or 6-side: E = 1.6e-15.
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 19:25   #52
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11×13×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max0526 View Post
I would vote for 2,2330L C207. It is the smallest, it could potentially be degree 5 or degree 6 for the poly, and we already have a goal for the poly score from two years ago on 5- or 6-side: E = 1.6e-15.
Ditto. It’s the smallest GNFS job left in the bunch though I would not call it easy.

Adding the four GNFS composites for ECM to t65. Chasing t65 beyond ~70K curves is not currently planned.

BTW, yoyo just found a p64 factor for 2,1087+, which is now fully factored!
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 19:33   #53
lukerichards
 
lukerichards's Avatar
 
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK

32·31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
I personally like 2,1165+ more than these for a forum project (for one, it ought to be degree 6 poly).
Me too.
lukerichards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 19:44   #54
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
May 2003
Down not across

3×52×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
BTW, yoyo just found a p64 factor for 2,1087+, which is now fully factored!
Yay!
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-12, 22:28   #55
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

1111100101102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max0526 View Post
I would vote for 2,2330L C207. It is the smallest, it could potentially be degree 5 or degree 6 for the poly, and we already have a goal for the poly score from two years ago on 5- or 6-side: E = 1.6e-15.
Pretty sure the transition from deg 5 to deg 6 lies between 215 and 220 digits. Our poly search for that C206 from XYYX had deg 5 and deg 6 scoring similarly, but the deg 5 performed something like 30% faster; another reminder of jasonp's admonition that scores from different degrees cannot be compared.

We can do C207 as a 34LP project on CADO, and I can host server tasks running I=16 for those with memory to spare and I=15 for those with lower-memory machines (say, 12GB and 3GB available for CADO client). I think I know how to merge the relations files from two runs into something CADO can handle; if not, msieve can likely put up with ~1.2G unique relations for postprocessing.

I'll set a core or two doing high-bound ECM on 2,2330L; I'll also PM user bdodson to see how much ECM he may have done on these numbers (thanks again to Mr Silverman for the suggestion).
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cunningham ECM efforts pinhodecarlos Cunningham Tables 7 2017-12-21 13:29
Cunningham ECM Now Futile? R.D. Silverman GMP-ECM 4 2012-04-25 02:45
Cunningham Project on YouTube Batalov Cunningham Tables 0 2012-02-26 02:58
Extended Cunningham or so rekcahx Factoring 6 2011-08-19 12:45
Introduction: ECM work done on Cunningham Project composites garo Cunningham Tables 2 2005-01-20 10:06

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:20.

Sun Mar 29 22:20:37 UTC 2020 up 4 days, 19:53, 3 users, load averages: 1.80, 1.47, 1.36

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.