mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-05-18, 12:34   #1
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

276410 Posts
Default New LLR version produces LLRnet results!

hi all,

Jean Penné (many thanks for that work) compiled a new version of LLR V.3.7.1c with the feature of producing LLRnet-compatible resultfiles,
so like this:

Code:
user=testuser
[2009-05-18 14:11:15]
432383773965*2^48611-1 is prime!  Time : 35.147 sec.
user=testuser
[2009-05-18 14:20:23]
391*2^263115-1 is not prime.  LLR Res64: B890E505AD7ABFD4  Time : 103.134 sec.
to obtain this output a new entry in the 'llr.ini' with the user has to be inserted, here:

Code:
LLRnetuser=testuser
if this line is not present, the output is like the original LLR (one line per result).

the only difference in the output-string is 'LLR Res64' instead of only 'Res64' by LLRnet!
but this in no problem, because the import-script should handle this by a small change (if one needed).

you can download this new LLR-version on Jean's page here http://jpenne.free.fr/index2.html (the MS Windows, GUI version).
for MAC-users there's no new exe available, because Jean got none.

please both David's post here any problems with the (small) different output-format for the import-scripts.

test some outputs before everyone can use this new feature!

thanks!


BTW:
the advantage of this feature is to import manual LLR-resultfiles directly into the NPLB-stats system without any work of conversion!
so you reserve a range for manual testing, complete the tests, and IronBits or AMDave can import them into the stats with all necessary information like it was done with LLRnet!
easy, he?

Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2009-05-18 at 12:44
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 13:24   #2
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

5·2,017 Posts
Default

Great work Karsten and Jean!

Oddly enough, Max and/or I have been converting all of the LLRNet results from "Res64" to "LLR Res64" so that they match manual results. Therefore, that is the way that I would prefer it here.


G
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 14:44   #3
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

2×13×109 Posts
Default

Quote:
to obtain this output a new entry in the 'llr.ini' with the user has to be inserted, here:

Code:
LLRnetuser=testuser
if this line is not present, the output is like the original LLR (one line per result).
I'm a little confused about this. The llr.ini file is not created until AFTER the program is executing. What happens to any output that may be created before you get the entry into the ini.file?
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 16:07   #4
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

624910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Oddly enough, Max and/or I have been converting all of the LLRNet results from "Res64" to "LLR Res64" so that they match manual results. Therefore, that is the way that I would prefer it here.
Yes, but that's *after* they've been imported into the DB. The DB feeds in the original results files, which still just say "Res64".

My script for converting manual results to LLRnet results changes it to "Res64", also. I'm not sure if that's crucial for the DB import; Dave, would it make any difference?
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 16:20   #5
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

53148 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
I'm a little confused about this. The llr.ini file is not created until AFTER the program is executing. What happens to any output that may be created before you get the entry into the ini.file?
- copy an old ini-file in your directory
- insert the line in the ini-file
- start LLR.exe
- choose your input- and output-file and starting line new (menu Test -> Input Data)
- all is ok
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 16:24   #6
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
I'm a little confused about this. The llr.ini file is not created until AFTER the program is executing. What happens to any output that may be created before you get the entry into the ini.file?
As Karsten said--also, we could provide users with a link to donwnload a specialized version of LLR that includes a premade llr.ini file. That would be quite useful for new users.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 17:36   #7
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

2·13·109 Posts
Default

Quote:
- copy an old ini-file in your directory
- insert the line in the ini-file
- start LLR.exe
- choose your input- and output-file and starting line new (menu Test -> Input Data)
- all is ok
Thanks Karsten. Works just fine.

Quote:
As Karsten said--also, we could provide users with a link to donwnload a specialized version of LLR that includes a premade llr.ini file. That would be quite useful for new users.
That probably would be helpful because new users wouldn't necessarily have an old ini file.
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 17:50   #8
kar_bon
 
kar_bon's Avatar
 
Mar 2006
Germany

22×691 Posts
Default

another way:

- just start and stop LLR immediatly -> the ini-file is avaiable and editable

but i think so too: a downloadable example would be best!
kar_bon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-18, 22:26   #9
Brucifer
 
Brucifer's Avatar
 
Dec 2005

313 Posts
Default

yes, please. :-)
Brucifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-19, 10:54   #10
AMDave
 
AMDave's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop

2·7·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Yes, but that's *after* they've been imported into the DB. The DB feeds in the original results files, which still just say "Res64".

My script for converting manual results to LLRnet results changes it to "Res64", also. I'm not sure if that's crucial for the DB import; Dave, would it make any difference?
Looking at the code of the stats-db import routine, it does make a difference at the moment.
If Jean wants to keep the format different to the old format or has run out of time to fix that then we can improve the db code so that it should make no difference and the characters "LLR " should be ignored.
I'll run some tests soon.

Last fiddled with by AMDave on 2009-05-19 at 11:02
AMDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LLRNET ValerieVonck Software 12 2010-03-15 18:09
Develop LLRnet version 3.7.1 for pay! mdettweiler No Prime Left Behind 6 2008-09-12 17:56
llrnet 64 bit balachmar Prime Sierpinski Project 4 2008-07-19 08:21
LLRnet Stats mdettweiler No Prime Left Behind 2 2008-02-14 03:13
LLRNet em99010pepe Riesel Prime Search 20 2007-09-11 21:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 21:07.

Sun Mar 29 21:07:17 UTC 2020 up 4 days, 18:40, 2 users, load averages: 2.14, 1.63, 1.59

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.