20090412, 01:53  #23 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2·5·1,009 Posts 
40 fast and 2 slower here. I'll PM Lennart shortly to give ROLP a fighting chance.

20090412, 01:58  #24  
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts 
Quote:
Sounds a bit tricky, but I guess you could get used to it. Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense now. Just my two, as usual. (big surprise there, huh?) 

20090412, 11:19  #25 
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
4035_{8} Posts 
There is a skip just down the road but there were no PCs in it, so I'll be bringing my usaul 6 cores.
Where does the constant "1.781" come from in C10 of the spreadsheet? Re. pants: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8pJIiV9KWo 
20090412, 13:57  #26 
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
6249_{10} Posts 
@Gary regarding your big post about probability and odds: ahh, I think I get it now. So, I guess one could say that, on average, if for a given range of numbers the odds of a prime are 1 in 4000, then someone will most likely score at least one prime (or, to be more exact, 1.15 primes ), if they do ~4600 testscorrect?
Oh, one last thing that I just thought of: is there any difference between the terms "1 in x odds" and "a chance of x to 1", besides the obvious reciprocation of the placements of x and 1? If there is a difference, then maybe that was at least a partial contributor to my confusion, since I'd always thought they were equivalent. (P.S.: I'll play around with the spreadsheet a bit later today as you suggest; hopefully that will shed further light on this topic. ) Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 20090412 at 14:13 
20090413, 03:01  #27  
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×5×1,009 Posts 
Quote:
Yes, correct on your first paragraph! Cool, I'm glad you got it. It's very strange but true. Keep in mind that they still will "most likely" score one prime at 4000 tests. They have a 62% chance of doing so. It's just that 38% of the time they won't find a prime. If that was all there was, then it would only amount to an average of 0.62 primes per 4000 tests, which is obviously incorrect. What brings the average up to 1 prime in 4000 tests is when 2 or more primes are found during that span. BTW, you could check this in all of your results files. If you have enough 6500test samples around n=~500K (odds are 1 in ~6500 of prime), you'll come in close to ~62% of them will contain a prime, although some will contain 2 or more. On your 2nd paragraph, you came to the right guy for that. :) In roulette, they pay you 35 to 1 if your number hits but you get to keep the bet that you placed. Therefore it also can be stated 36 FOR 1. Some casinos will try to "mess" with you by quoting odds different ways like that. So in order to break even at roulette over the long run, your number has to hit 1 out of every 36 times. Therefore for something that happens 1 out of every 36 times you have: Odds of 1 in 36 or Chances of 35 TO 1 or Chances of 36 FOR 1 Of course if you've played roulette, you know that the true odds are 1 in 38 since there are 38 #'s on the (American) roulette wheel. That's the house "vig" of 5.26% there. [For the Europeans around, I realize that it is 1 in 37 where the house vig is only 2.63%. It's a far more popular casino game in Europe than the U.S. The better odds for the player are probably a big part of it.] So no, you cannot just reciprocate the placement of the odds when stating it in xx to xx format. But also no, I do not believe that was what caused your confusion. I believe that was caused by forgetting that you can actually find 2 or more primes in a 1000 test sample. So even for a 1 in 4000 chance of something, you have to run 1150 tests to have a 25% chance of it occuring but you COULD find 2 or more primes during that time. Making it easier, sometimes you'll hear someone say something has about an "even chance" of happening or that it is an "even chance" bet. What that means is that the chance of it happening or that the bet pays is 1 TO 1. (The two 1's is why it is referred to as even chance; i.e. they are the same.) If you win, you get paid $1 and you keep your original bet or stated differently 2 FOR 1 or odds of 1 in 2. If you ever hear about a horse or dog going off at 3 to 5, you'll know he's very good. People are willing to bet $5 to win $3. The animal has to win 5 out of every 8 times for you to break even in the long run. (I've seen one go off at 1 to 5 but it is quite rare. It would require that the animal win 5 out of 6 times for you to break even in the long run.) Almost always the left side of the xx to xx form is higher. BTW, if I remember right, about a month ago, the Patriots were about a 4 to 1 or 7 to 2 (i.e. 3.5 to 1) favorite to win the Super Bowl next year. That's probably pretty good considering there are 32 teams. I think the odds on various things like that are quite interesting but have never placed a sports bet in my life. I think a week before the presidental election, Obama was about a 1 to 7 favorite to win. Obviously McCain was given little chance a week out. OK, rambled and gambled again. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20090413 at 03:15 

20090413, 16:45  #28 
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT5)
3×2,083 Posts 
Ah, I get it now. Thanksthat makes sense.

20090415, 01:11  #29 
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3·7·53 Posts 
Start 00:00:00 April 17th GMT right?
Ends 00:00:00 April 20th GMT right? 
20090415, 02:01  #30 
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
4267_{10} Posts 

20090415, 05:10  #31 
Jun 2006
Chertsey Surrey UK
2×179 Posts 
LA 12am Friday 17th
SA 2pm Friday 17th NY 3pm Friday 17th Montreal 4pm Friday 17th London 8pm Friday 17th Paris 9pm Friday 17th Berlin 10pm Friday 17th Delhi 1.30am Saturday 18th Sydney 5am Saturday 18th Funny old thing time it's all over the place :) Last fiddled with by PCZ on 20090415 at 05:35 
20090415, 05:29  #32 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
276A_{16} Posts 
We attempt to start and end it a time that is convienient for the most people, i.e. in the U.S. and Europe.
We'll leave it as is for this rally but with Dave (AMDave) in Australia, we could consider starting them a little later, perhaps at 9 PM GMT. That'd still be early (7 AM) in Sydney but not as bad as 5 AM and it would allow a few folks to be home from work in the U.S., especially in the summer. It would only push it to midnight in Berlin so that wouldn't make it too bad for Karsten. I don't think we have anyone east of Germany except for Dave so that might actually be a better alternative for future rallies. That said, I'm not sure it makes much difference on the start and end time. I think that people usually just set their machines to crunch before they go to work or bed and let 'er rip. I usually get them all crunching except my slower cores a day or more before the rally. Gary 
20090415, 05:43  #33 
I ♥ BOINC!
Oct 2002
Glendale, AZ. (USA)
3·7·53 Posts 
GMT 0 1900
EDT 4 1500 CDT 5 1400 MDT 6 1300 MST 7 1200 (Arizona) PDT 7 1200 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
LLRnet/PRPnet rally August 12th19th  mdettweiler  No Prime Left Behind  88  20100909 12:50 
My own Rally  em99010pepe  No Prime Left Behind  4  20081216 23:31 
Rally Sept. 5th7th  gd_barnes  No Prime Left Behind  77  20081111 03:39 
The B5SPBS24 Rally  masser  Conjectures 'R Us  3  20080917 15:10 
48 hr rally  em99010pepe  Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5  19  20061108 00:52 