mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > No Prime Left Behind

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-05-12, 11:44   #12
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31·67 Posts
Default

I never checked the sieving sufficiency for the 93 ks. I just stopped when I got bored.

Now is the time to consider including 4000-5000!!! 1400-2000 was immensly popular and I suspect this drive will be too.
imho It needs to gradually pull away from top-5000 level.
Flatlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-12, 12:07   #13
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

276A16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
I never checked the sieving sufficiency for the 93 ks. I just stopped when I got bored.

Now is the time to consider including 4000-5000!!! 1400-2000 was immensly popular and I suspect this drive will be too.
imho It needs to gradually pull away from top-5000 level.
Why would we also include k=4000-5000? Wouldn't k=2000-4000 be enough for the time being?
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-12, 12:17   #14
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×5×1,009 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdettweiler View Post
Hmm...interesting idea. It would be nice to get some fresh meat for the project once again.

One thing, though, that I think we should keep in mind. I believe that as we continue to expand this project further and further up the k-range spectrum, we need to start setting some hard limits for n-values for given k-ranges, so that we're not piling up drives upon drives that are all going nowhere because they've passed the point where they're "interesting".

How about this: for the range of k=1400-2000, let's set a "stopping point" of n=1M. That is, when it reaches 1M, we won't immediately move on to >1M. Instead, we'll spend those resources on the k=2000-4000 range, and get that up to whatever target we set--possibly 1M, or maybe 600K. Once that's done, we'd move on to the next range, possibly k=4000-6000 or something like that. Et cetera.

k=400-1001 could be left has the "no limit" range--i.e., that's the one that we continue to extend the n-range for whenever we finish the current range. That will fill out the high-n end of the project's selection of work.

Thoughts, flames, rotten tomatoes?

Max

Excellent ideas. By doing this, the project should have a large selection of n-ranges to choose from at any one time. I think having the higher n-ranges available will bring in a number of larger searchers. The lower ones should make it more fun for the smaller searchers.

Of course I wouldn't suggest making them "hard limits" though. For instance, for now, the limit of k=1400-2000 could be n=1M but as we get higher k's searched closer to n=800K, then 900K, etc., then we would expand k=1400-2000 to n=1.5M or 2M while at the same time expanding k=300-1001 up to n=4M or something like that.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-12, 15:39   #15
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

624910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
Of course I wouldn't suggest making them "hard limits" though. For instance, for now, the limit of k=1400-2000 could be n=1M but as we get higher k's searched closer to n=800K, then 900K, etc., then we would expand k=1400-2000 to n=1.5M or 2M while at the same time expanding k=300-1001 up to n=4M or something like that.
Yes, definitely. "Hard limits" was the incorrect term to use there. I was thinking of them more as just temporary "caps" to the n-range which will signify the point at which we'll stop and let that range be for a while until the shape of the k-range landscape indicates that it should once again be pushed up to the next level.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-13, 11:41   #16
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

2×5×1,009 Posts
Default

I have been considering various options for future search ranges but after a discussion with Ian by PM, have decided to take his advice and get some private views from people on the future direction of the project.

If you are a regular or even a part-time searcher for NPLB, look for an Email within the next 2 days asking for input. I/we will use the prime notification Email addresses that people have entered in our database.


Gary
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-05-13, 16:45   #17
Brucifer
 
Brucifer's Avatar
 
Dec 2005

313 Posts
Default

Well well, I sent you an email about this very subject just before I logged on here. I must be Claire-voy-ant or something like that.
Brucifer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Move 19 game direction MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 8 2016-02-01 17:50
Thoughts on future NPLB searches em99010pepe No Prime Left Behind 38 2008-12-23 10:02
Future direction of NPLB gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 33 2008-09-11 15:26
Future project direction and server needs synopsis gd_barnes No Prime Left Behind 6 2008-02-29 01:09
Poll on direction of conjectures effort gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 2 2007-12-19 18:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 23:38.

Wed Apr 1 23:38:59 UTC 2020 up 7 days, 21:12, 3 users, load averages: 1.56, 1.33, 1.23

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.