![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
![]()
What's the status of 5,317-, 6,283-, 5,323- etc? I understand that
they finished sieving some time ago. Last fiddled with by Wacky on 2007-09-17 at 14:50 Reason: Quoted material did not pertain to the query |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32×112 Posts |
![]()
Paul has been processing 6,283-.
On Sept 5, he reported that he had produced a 4.75M matrix and that it would require about 12 more days to run the Block Lanzcos phase on his machine. So I expect to hear something from him soon. Subsequently, I began processing 5,317-. I managed to produce a 4.38M matrix but my 32 bit processing is much slower than Paul's 64 bit implementation. I'd done about 20%, but do not expect to finish before late October. 5,323- is our current sieving. We have done about 40% and should complete that sieving mid-October if we are able to continue at the current rate. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
2·32·17·37 Posts |
![]() Quote:
If I can complete the factorization from here I will. Otherwise, it will have to wait until I return home (doubtless jetlagged) on Thursday. Paul P.S. Actually, it is impossible right now. It appears that my home ADSL link is down. Last fiddled with by xilman on 2007-09-18 at 01:42 Reason: Add P.S. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
1132210 Posts |
![]() Quote:
With a bit of luck I may be able to get the factors tomorrow. Paul |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
32·112 Posts |
![]()
Last night, Paul reported to me that he had returned to England and retrieved the following information before going to bed after an exhausting trip.
Quote:
On 5,317-, I have completed 30% of the Block Lanczos iterations. And we have completed approximately 50% of the sieving for 5,323-. Last fiddled with by Wacky on 2007-09-22 at 17:21 Reason: Correct Grammar |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sep 2002
33016 Posts |
![]()
Is the actual NFSNet project website going to be updated soon with all this new information about what has been completed since April? That was the date of the last bit of news on the website. I understand if the person who does that needs to recover from his travelling, but as I help keep one of the biggest DC project websites updated, it would be nice to make some official news about it from the website, no hurry though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
210 Posts |
![]() Quote:
for the new numbers; not web page maintenance. The person that used to do the web page and stats retired from NFSNET, and hasn't been replaced. Fivemack/Tom did some interim updates, perhaps he could do another round? -bdodson |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Sep 2002
24×3×17 Posts |
![]()
Thank you so much for the quick answer to my question. There are a great many people who visit the DC site I help with and I'm sure they are interested in what's going on with things. :)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
21018 Posts |
![]()
I am pleased to report that, with the assistance of "frmky" Greg Childers (CalState-Fullerton) and utilizing code from msieve ("jasonp" Jason Papadopoulos), NFSNet has completed the factorization of 5,317-.
Greg reported Quote:
In the meantime, we continue to sieve for 5,323-, having reached about 2/3 of the estimated interval. With both Paul and Greg capable of doing the post processing in a reasonable timeframe, we can use some additional help in the sieving. Please join us. On the behalf of the entire NFSNet Factoring Group, Richard "Wacky" Wackerbarth Last fiddled with by Wacky on 2007-09-28 at 22:46 Reason: Wrong University System |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Jul 2003
So Cal
2×29×41 Posts |
![]()
Just a few details... As far as I am aware, this the largest SNFS factorization to date completed with Jason's msieve. Approximately 52 million relations were converted from CWI to GGNFS format, then fed to msieve running on a 1.8 GHz single-core Opteron 144 system with 3 GB of memory in 64-bit Linux.
The filtering took about 4 hours to complete, and used 2.6 GB of memory. It produced a final 4945096 x 4945296 matrix with weight 430746398. After setting aside the dense rows due to the quadratic characters and small primes, Block Lanczos was started on a 4945048 x 4945296 matrix with weight 325847903 (a bit less than 66 nonzero entries per column). Although the calendar time was a bit longer due to concurrently running processes, the runtime was just over 6 days, and used 1.4 GB of memory. Each square root run took about 2 1/4 hours and used about 1 GB of memory. The factors were found on the 5th dependency. Greg |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
5·709 Posts |
![]()
I must say, this announcement has just made my evening. Richard, is there any information about the matrix generated by the CWI suite, and how long the linear algebra would have taken?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |