20041016, 10:50  #1 
5759_{10} Posts 
M1 thru M22
Not yet triple checked.
I would like others to help check this a few more times. These small primes, are the most important of all general Mersenne primes. Just as the smallest prime 2, sieves out half of all natural candidates. I will release a beta version 1.7 that is stripped down a bit. Please respond here if interested in helping the effort. Your name will be imprinted far into the sequence of perfection! Last fiddled with by TTn on 20041016 at 10:53 Reason: oops 
20060322, 01:30  #2 
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22210_{8} Posts 
Maybe a run on Glucas of all of these would take a handfull of days.

20060324, 19:49  #3  
∂^{2}ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2×7×829 Posts 
Quote:


20060325, 00:26  #4 
6,967 Posts 
clarification
I can't help but clarify this foolishness.
The general Mersenne primes (3,7,31,127,1279,...) between these Mersenne points {1 thru M22}! Remember all Mersenne primes are general Mersenne primes, but the converse is not true. If the number of Mersenne primes were finite, then the minimum (k=1), would be excluded from the general Mersenne prime sequence. Hence making the minimum (k=3), which is absurd. 
20060325, 01:43  #5  
∂^{2}ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
2·7·829 Posts 
Quote:
Similarly, you stated: Quote:


20060325, 02:47  #6 
755_{16} Posts 
Ewmayer,
This forum clearly and reasonably states general Mersenne primes, if anyone was listening to the project leader, and the other threads: http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2222 http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=2218 http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3602 http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=3596 Is it really my fault, that you ignore to understand this correctly? 