![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Jul 2018
4010 Posts |
![]() Quote:
if you can think simple, and step by step. please look simple program: 'Qbasic64 program lines 'perfect square randomize base average twin formula 'and real twin counts compare work, 'please look how very near? 'please github search, 'https://github.com/kimwalisch/primesieve/releases 'primesieve-7.1-win64-console.zip '7.1 better performance than 7.2 'oldies sometimes goodies. 'please unzip to c:\test\ 'directory. 'run qbasic64 program. 'results c:\test\tw.txt files. 'experimantal randomize test. 'n*n to (n+1)*(n+1) perfect ranges 'if we can chouse randomly, (2*n+1)/2 times two integer, 'and look: if these randomize integers are a twin prime than count=count+1 'and chousen integers not come back! 'we look every integer from n*n to (n+1)*(n+1) 'experimental count near twin count, 'near counsin count, 'near sophi dues first prime count, 'near goldbach 6k+0 count 'or near goldbach 6k+2 count *2 or near goldbach 6k+4 count*2 or 'near (goldbach 6k+2 count + goldbach 6k+4 count), '... etc... hundreds format type dues primes alwayas near! 'randomize system mean, if we look very big results, 'not gambling, only axiomatic so formulative. 'math people if many many test randomize and prime relations, 'every body learn: primes regular base randomize so aximatic. 'math people must learn and may be make bulding: 'prime randomize system theory. 'thank you sophie. 'i am an outistic, brain damage! 'please look twin, cousin, goldbach, legendere con. 'and sophie primes alltogether, how near count? 'twin primes near positions:p2-p1=2 'sophhie primes far positions: 'p2-p1=p1+1, if p1 near 2^63 then 'p2 near 2^64 'distance: 2^63+1, astronomic! 'distance near 19 decimal digits 'but sophie due primes: first prime count near 'twin prime count! 'how? 'please look: 'https://www.quora.com/Is-the-twin-prime-problem-important 'hal ise answer, last lines important! DIM m AS _UNSIGNED _INTEGER64 SHELL "md c:\test" OPEN "c:\test\tw.txt" FOR OUTPUT AS #1 FOR u = 64 TO 26 STEP -.5 FOR m = INT(SQR(2 ^ u) - 2) TO INT(SQR(2 ^ u) - 18) STEP -1 CLOSE 1 y## = m yy## = y## * y## yy## = LOG(yy## + m + .25) OPEN "c:\test\tw.bat" FOR OUTPUT AS #1 a$= "echo "+ "2**" + MID$(STR$(u / 2), 2) + ": " + MID$(STR$(m), 2) + "*" + MID$(STR$(m), 2) a$=a$+ " to " + MID$(STR$(m + 1), 2) + "*" + MID$(STR$(m + 1), 2) + " >>c:\test\tw.txt" ?#1,a$ PRINT #1, "echo twin formul="; STR$(INT(1.32## * 2## * y## / yy## / yy##)); ">>c:\test\tw.txt" a$= "c:\test\primesieve -s256 -c2 -q " + MID$(STR$(m), 2) + "*" + MID$(STR$(m), 2) + " " a$=a$+ MID$(STR$(m + 1), 2) + "*" + MID$(STR$(m + 1), 2) + " >>c:\test\tw.txt" ?#1,a$ SHELL "c:\test\tw.bat" NEXT NEXT Last fiddled with by hal1se on 2018-11-04 at 05:33 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Jul 2018
23·5 Posts |
![]() if you wonder prime number system how randomize, without any write program: experimantal randomize test legendere con. n=4914, near int[sqr( exp(17))] question: n*n to (n+1)*(n*1) range prime count? real prime count=598 formula prime count=(2*n+1)/ln(n*n+n)=(2*4914+1)/ln(4914*4914+4914)=~578 randomize prime count: lower bound:n*n=24147396 upper bound:(n+1)*(n+1)=24157225 sample value=2*n+1=9829 https://www.random.org/integers/?num...in&rnd=id.9829 question: how this site? they say: true random, true? ha ha haa, this univer randoms only pesude, not ideal! white noise, quantum random, etc..., always pseude! if we not understand, how pseude, not important! reality: this universe ideal random imposible! but true mean: lengendere test ok then, true mean is true! ctrl A ctrl C https://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM ctrl V factor button ctrl F is prime 603 result 598 very near 603 may be chance https://www.random.org/integers/?num...in&rnd=id.9830 ctrl A ctrl C https://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM ctrl R ctrl A ctrl V factor a few times (9 times) left mouse click under 1-2 cm."about this application" ctrl F is prim 591 very near 598 may be cahance https://www.random.org/integers/?num...in&rnd=id.9831 ctrl A ctrl C https://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM ctrl R ctrl A ctrl V factor a few times (19 times) left mouse click under 1-2 cm."about this application" ctrl F is pri 582 very near 598 may be cahance! https://www.random.org/integers/?num...in&rnd=id.9832 ctrl A ctrl C https://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM ctrl R ctrl A 2 factor ctrl A ctrl V a few times (14 times) left mouse click under 1-2 cm."about this application" ctrl F is p 581 very near 598 may be chance, NO! 4 different random: 4 times 9829 integer and prime count very near, randomize result. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Jul 2018
23·5 Posts |
![]()
i tested two type randomize only small perfect square ranges:
https://www.random.org/integers/?num...in&rnd=id.9833 https://www.random.org/integer-sets/...in&rnd=id.9833 comma and space >> replace >> 0d0a real twin count=48 please test yourself two type randomize near how twin count? i don't find near 8 billions true random. qbasic randoms very bad. < 256^3 for example:n=4294967294 perfect square: 4294967294*4294967294 to 4294967295*4294967295 how many twin real twin count = 5762802 formula twin count = 5761730 and experimental randomize test: lower bound=4294967294*4294967294=18446744056529682436 upper bound=4294967295*4294967295=18446744065119617025 sample value=2*n+1=2*4294967295+1=8589934592 if we chouse 8589934592/2=4294967296 times so near 4 billions times two integers. 18446744056529682436 to 18446744065119617025 two type randomize data: first: every near 8 billions integer only one time! 18446744056529682436 18446744056529682437 18446744056529682438 ... 18446744065119617024 18446744065119617025 this short squential integers mixed randomize! mixed and mixed! so: only mixed integers. look 1th and 2th integers, if same time a prime then count = count+1 look 3th and 4th integers, if same time a prime then count = count+1 ... look 8589934591th and 8589934592th integers, if same time a prime then count = count+1 chousen intgers not come back! or: second: chousen integers posible come back! 18446744056529682436 to 18446744065119617025 8589934592 times frely random integers. many many same integers this time posible! we chouse two integers: 8589934592/2=4294967296 times look 1th and 2th integers, if same time a prime then count = count+1 look 3th and 4th integers, if same time a prime then count = count+1 ... look 8589934591th and 8589934592th integers, if same time a prime then count = count+1 same type near result. randomize chousen integer not come back or randomize chousen integer posible come back not important! question: randomize test count=? count very near perfect square twin formula or real twin count or real cousin count. count very near perfect square sophie due primes first pirme count, count very near: perfect square near middle point symmetry point=g, goldbach 6k+0 type due symmetric prime count, note: p1+p2 goldach dues sum primes must be: p1>n*n p2<(n+1)*(n+1) for example 6k+4 goldbach dues: g=(n*n+(n+1)*(n+1))/2 g=int[(n*n+n)]=18446744060824649730 2g=p1+p2=6k+4 2g must be 6k+4 g must be 3k+2 g=int[g/3]*3+2 g=18446744060824649732 2g=36893488121649299464 for 6k+2: g=int[g/3]*3+1 2g=36893488121649299462 and important note for goldbach: if p1+p2 then not count p2+p1, because same count very near: perfect square near middle point symmetry point=g, goldbach (6k+2 + 6k+4) two type due symmetric prime count, please test yourself, may be easy see: prime system regular base randomize, so axiomatic, so predictive, so formulative big ranges. very clear. how not seen prime randomize system theory in math? Last fiddled with by hal1se on 2018-11-05 at 17:23 Reason: my brain damage, please forgive, and good by |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twin Primes | Hugh | Math | 64 | 2011-01-26 08:45 |
What if we don't find twin prime n=333333? | cipher | Twin Prime Search | 5 | 2009-04-16 21:53 |
After we find a twin, our next exponent will be... | MooooMoo | Twin Prime Search | 49 | 2006-12-31 21:52 |
If you find a twin prime... | MooooMoo | Twin Prime Search | 2 | 2006-05-11 23:38 |
OT: Twin Primes | R.D. Silverman | Math | 8 | 2005-07-15 21:56 |