20190419, 11:54  #1 
May 2004
13C_{16} Posts 
Random thoughts on RH
1) We can say that proving RH is equivalent to proving that
zeta(s + it) is a non trivial nonzero when the real part (s) is other than 1/2, irrespective of the imaginary part(t) (to be continued). 
20190420, 05:47  #2 
May 2004
474_{8} Posts 
2) one implies many: I.e. if a zero exists on any line parallel to 1/2 then many ought to exist. If this can be proved we have practicality proved RH.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
random comments, random questions and thread titles made for Google  jasong  Lounge  46  20170509 12:32 
Opening thoughts  Batalov  Game 2  ♔♕♙♘♖♙  Shaolin Pirates  5  20130726 00:10 
Thoughts about the next project  unconnected  Aliquot Sequences  2  20110919 09:06 
About random number (random seed) in Msieve  Greenk12  Factoring  1  20081115 13:56 
Client Thoughts  Complex33  Software  8  20040204 10:46 