![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Dec 2008
15018 Posts |
![]()
In LaTeX, to say that a is congruent to 1 (mod b), I use the \equiv command as such:
However, what is the LaTeX command for a is *not* congruent to 1 (mod b)? I thought it would be \nequiv, but it isn't. Also, to show that a | b in LaTeX, I use the pipe symbol. What is the LaTeX command for a is *not* a divisor of b? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10000101101102 Posts |
![]() Code:
\not\equiv \not| Code:
\cancel\equiv \cancel| I think the difference is that \cancel can be used on any arbitrary thing, while \not is only for single characters like \equiv, |, or 3. Not entirely sure about that, but it seems right from a quick test. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-05-16 at 16:07 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Dec 2008
15018 Posts |
![]() Code:
\not\equiv Code:
\not| |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
May 2003
7·13·17 Posts |
![]()
I use \nmid, for not divides.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Dec 2008
72·17 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Dec 2008
83310 Posts |
![]()
In LaTeX, equations are autonumbered as (1), (2), (3),..., and so on. How do I make it such that every equation is labeled as such:
(a.b.c) a = section number b = subsection number c = equation number within subsection For instance, the 5th equation in the 2nd subsection of the 3rd section should be labeled as (3.2.5). I "googled" it, and it says I have to put Code:
\numberwithin{equation}{subsection} |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Dec 2008
72·17 Posts |
![]()
Also, I have an equation that is too long. For the sake of simplicity, let's say I have the equation,
x+y=5, but that is too long. Basically, how would I do it in LaTeX such that I have, x+ y=5 In other words, how do I split an equation? Some of the guides I tried don't work.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Aug 2006
3·1,993 Posts |
![]() Quote:
\[ \begin{split} x&=-b/2\pm\\ &\sqrt{(b/2)^2-c} \end{split} \] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
May 2003
7·13·17 Posts |
![]()
You can also use \begin{eqnarray}\end{eqnarray}, or \begin{multline}\end{multline}, but I also like split.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Dec 2008
72·17 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
May 2003
7×13×17 Posts |
![]()
Yep, except it is multline, not multiline. (That, and I like split better, but with multline you get equation numbers for each line.) I'll attach some of the LaTeX help files I have on my computer later tonight.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Latex searcher ? | science_man_88 | science_man_88 | 2 | 2018-07-21 17:11 |
being able to use a latex package | wildrabbitt | Software | 7 | 2018-01-12 19:46 |
P.C. Poops Latex | ProximaCentauri | Miscellaneous Math | 7 | 2014-12-05 22:28 |
LATex Documents | Numbers | Lounge | 8 | 2005-12-31 09:33 |
Could we use LaTeX in this forum some day ? | T.Rex | Forum Feedback | 5 | 2005-08-29 19:45 |