Aliquot sequences that start on the integer powers n^i

[garambois]

@Happy5244 :
Don't I get it ?
I thought it was you !
Would you rather I replaced "HPP" with "A" for Anonymous ?
Because I didn't do the sequence calculations !
Unless the person who did them comes forward...
I hope I didn't make a mistake in the mention of the contributor for base 21.
It's not voluntary if yes !


@RichD :
OK, I'm releasing the orange cells.
But the green ones will always keep our name, because they were finished by you...


@yoyo :
OK.

[Happy5214]

Originally Posted by garambois

@Happy5244 :
Don't I get it ?
I thought it was you !
Would you rather I replaced "HPP" with "A" for Anonymous ?
Because I didn't do the sequence calculations !
Unless the person who did them comes forward...
I hope I didn't make a mistake in the mention of the contributor for base 21.
It's not voluntary if yes !

My guess is that they were finished by FactorDB automatically when the sequences were pulled by your script. I think they should be marked Anonymous.

[garambois]

OK, I'll note them "A".

[yoyo]

Do you update the page by script or is it manually work?

[garambois]

I update the page by script.
But it still takes me more than an hour, because I have to check everything (because of bad handling sometimes), enter the reservations, I have to deal with the different bases separately, reread all the posts to take it into account ...
And I'm missing a lot of time, like everybody else ;-)

[RichD]

Originally Posted by Happy5214

I do not deserve any credit for any of the green n=21 sequences, as I did no work on those. I don't know if you (Jean-Luc) did them or if they were done directly on FactorDB, but those shouldn't be attributed to me.

Originally Posted by garambois

@RichD :
But the green ones will always keep our name, because they were finished by you...

Originally Posted by garambois

OK, I'll note them "A".

I am seeing the same thing with base n=30. There was only a handful of exponents I had to advance to get the termination. Let's say any sequence with <= 25 terms (indexes) was created by FDB and should be credited to "A".

[garambois]

OK, page updated.
Many thanks to all !

Base 14 complete.
Base 510510 complete.
I take base 30.

@Happy5214 :
At the next update, what name of contributor do you want me to put for the green cells of bases 24 and 210 ?

@yoyo :
Now we've got a white cell for Base 3 again !

[yoyo]

Why is there no table for base 4, 8 and 9?

[RichD]

Originally Posted by garambois

I take base 30.

I was still working on the white cells in base 30 but you can have it.

[RichD]

I'll start table 770.

[garambois]

Originally Posted by yoyo

Why is there no table for base 4, 8 and 9?

The sequences of bases 4 and 8 are the same as those of base 2. Indeed, 4^k=(2^2)^k=2^(2*k) and 8^k=(2^3)^k=2^(3*k) Same for base 9=3^2 with base 3.