20150911, 11:28  #1 
Dec 2008
you know...around...
26E_{16} Posts 
Large Gaps >500,000
Shouldn't the Border PRP's at http://www.worldofnumbers.com/ from Patrick DeGeest et al. also be included in Dr. Nicely's list?
There's, for example, a record length of 841716 (Merit: 4.72) before and after 10^77418. 
20150911, 15:59  #2  
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
3576_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I don't think there is any reason why smaller merit gaps can't still be posted  nothing on the site suggests this. Personally, I won't post now unless my gap is 10 merit or better. But in 2008 I did post smaller merits than that. 

20150911, 18:17  #3 
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
2×3×151 Posts 
They certainly could be added, and Patrick De Geest is already on Nicely's author list. I would guess the merits were just too low for them to bother with.
There sure are a lot more frequent updates now than before the threads here. I'm not sure if Antonio Key is using his own software or, since he's on this forum and started submitting after my post, using my code. Dr. Nicely may not care any more  he used to be more strict (e.g. everyone using TOeS's codes has TOS in their abbreviated name, similar with JKA). I'm not sure what to think of the "running code based on Perl" after my name :). I wrote GMP code plus an interface to Perl, and various scripts that use it in Perl. Perhaps everyone else should have "running code based on C, libc, libm, and GMP/gwnum" added :). Of course big kudos to Torbjörn and the other GMP devs, plus Baillie, Wagstaff, Selfridge, Crandall, Pomerance, Cohen, etc. without whom I'd have nothing. Plus encouragement of other open source devs/writers like Kim Walisch, Wojciech Izykowski, David Cleaver, Mario Roy, the Pari/GP team, CRG IV, TOeS, etc. The list could go on a long time. 
20151230, 17:46  #4 
Dec 2008
you know...around...
2·311 Posts 
I'd like to enter "nextprime(primorial(20443)/2229464046810)precprime(primorial(20443)/2229464046810)" into WolframAlpha, but I'm afraid it would take too long...
a.k.a. prove that either my new PC or OpenPFGW was wrong  at least once! 
20151230, 22:00  #5 
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
1612_{8} Posts 
For n=primorial(20443)/2229464046810:
With Perl/ntheory I got 13522 in 23 minutes. A merit of 0.668. Pari/GP took 80 minutes for the same result. 
20151230, 22:24  #6  
Dec 2008
you know...around...
2·311 Posts 
Quote:
I was reluctant to submit my results because I doubted the gap was way >4M, according to my PC. What bounding primes do you have? 

20151231, 01:09  #7 
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
2·3·151 Posts 
n = primorial(20443)/2229464046810 = 4707 ... 301362933747165290194855805813 (8796 digits)
n  3822 = 4707 ... 301362933747165290194855801991 n + 9700 = 4707 ... 301362933747165290194855815513 Since they're probable primes (BPSW, Frobenius, FrobeniusUnderwood, FrobeniusKhashin) we certainly expect them to pass a Fermat test: $ ./pfgw64s q'20443#/22294640468103822' PFGW Version 3.7.7.64BIT.20130722.x86_Dev [GWNUM 27.11] 20443#/22294640468103822 is 3PRP! (1.6745s+0.0859s) $ ./pfgw64s q'20443#/2229464046810+9700' PFGW Version 3.7.7.64BIT.20130722.x86_Dev [GWNUM 27.11] 20443#/2229464046810+9700 is 3PRP! (1.6576s+0.0814s) 
20151231, 03:10  #8 
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
2×3×151 Posts 
With PFGW 3.7.7 (and 3.8.0) the prevprime and nextprime use a very shallow small factor test plus David Cleaver's strong Lucas GMP code. It's a good solution for "normal" size inputs, but for large ones it is quite slow. The lack of a deep sieve plus the more expensive primality test lead to a prevprime time for this input of 88 minutes vs. 6 minutes for Perl/ntheory.
Something like Dr. Nicely's cglp4 does would be *much* faster  do a deep sieve then call pfgw for each candidate. Using Perl/ntheory's deeper sieve combined with PFGW for the candidates would be a bit over 3 minutes: almost 2x faster at this size than my GMP BPSW and ~25x faster than PFGW 3.7.7's code. I imagine it just isn't something used very much, and just added for convenience on small inputs. So not something we'd want to use for prime gap searches (though the underlying gwnum library would help, or calling PFGW for its fast Fermat test on a single input). 
20160103, 02:08  #9  
Dec 2008
you know...around...
26E_{16} Posts 
Quote:
So, to be precise: is there someone that may check if there is any prime between 230077#/22294640468103131794 and 230077#/2229464046810+1548362 ? 

20160103, 04:32  #10 
"Dana Jacobsen"
Feb 2011
Bangkok, TH
906_{10} Posts 
Ah, Wolfram uses p_n # instead of n#. Sorry, I did know you were giving exact Mathematica code. PFGW uses n# and p(n)#.
I ran it with Perl/ntheory using pn_primorial(): n = p_20443#//2229464046810 = 5104776 .. 363999414351 (99750 digits) A gap of 4680156 for a number this size would be about merit 20.4. Completely believable, and enough to make it the largest gap on record. I'm running prev_prime and next_prime, but at this size it'll take quite a while. Last fiddled with by danaj on 20160103 at 04:34 
20160103, 12:11  #11 
Dec 2008
you know...around...
2·311 Posts 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Prime gaps  Terence Schraut  Miscellaneous Math  10  20200901 23:49 
Medium Gaps 60,000 to 500,000  robert44444uk  Prime Gap Searches  77  20161228 08:19 
Small gaps 4,000  60,000  henryzz  Prime Gap Searches  18  20160215 18:58 
Very small gaps  1,300  4,000  robert44444uk  Prime Gap Searches  33  20160203 12:55 
Gaps and more gaps on <300 site  gd_barnes  Riesel Prime Search  11  20070627 04:12 