mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-10-30, 21:45   #56
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

30758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
Just wait then until they are reassigned, wus have a 7 day limit.
If I thought there were no returns because of bunkering, then yes, that would be a fine suggestion. My whole point is that I find it very doubtful that out of more than 15000 work units, every single one of them is being held onto for this reason. If that were true, then we wouldn't expect to see any returns from 13_2_873m1 either. Yet there they are.

Shouldn't we consider the possibility that there's an actual problem of some kind with 5_2_791m1 which is preventing work units from being processed correctly on return? It's not like that sort of thing hasn't happened occasionally in the past.
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-30, 21:58   #57
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

2×2,389 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jyb View Post
If I thought there were no returns because of bunkering, then yes, that would be a fine suggestion. My whole point is that I find it very doubtful that out of more than 15000 work units, every single one of them is being held onto for this reason. If that were true, then we wouldn't expect to see any returns from 13_2_873m1 either. Yet there they are.

Shouldn't we consider the possibility that there's an actual problem of some kind with 5_2_791m1 which is preventing work units from being processed correctly on return? It's not like that sort of thing hasn't happened occasionally in the past.

Don't see what´s the problem regarding your first paragraph. I know some of those big hitters have enough cores or virtual machines setup to host more than 15,000 wus in a row.
2nd paragraph, maybe. Just wait please. Let the challenge go away to troubleshoot what's going on. The only thing now is do not mess around during the challenge window, this is the only thing I am asking for now.

Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2020-10-30 at 21:59
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-30, 22:01   #58
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

11×409 Posts
Default

The poly is bad- I cut and pasted from my linux terminal, not noticing that it cut off the n: line with a $ at the end of the visible line.

So, as jyb correctly surmised, those 15000 WUs are bad. :-/

I'll re-post the corrected poly file in the queue management thread.

Charybdis caught this same mistake on my Aliquot C196 to 16e queue thread, and I forgot and did it again after doing 5_784 and 13_873 correctly.

Mea Culpa.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-30, 22:06   #59
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

112528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
The poly is bad- I cut and pasted from my linux terminal, not noticing that it cut off the n: line with a $ at the end of the visible line.

So, as jyb correctly surmised, those 15000 WUs are bad. :-/

I'll re-post the corrected poly file in the queue management thread.

Charybdis caught this same mistake on my Aliquot C196 to 16e queue thread, and I forgot and did it again after doing 5_784 and 13_873 correctly.

Mea Culpa.

This will mess guys bunkering, they will see all wus giving errors, nevertheless it is possible to bunker 15,000 wus BTW. I can do that with my old laptop tricking the server to see my laptop with 512 cores for example. Glad you managed to detect the issue.

Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2020-10-30 at 22:11
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-30, 22:15   #60
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

106238 Posts
Default

I fully believe that they could grab that many workunits- but, as jyb said, zero coming back when all other numbers still have a trickle returning suggested investigation was necessary.

The problem was simple to catch, but that doesn't change the status of those 15,000 workunits.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-30, 22:19   #61
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

2×2,389 Posts
Default

Fair enough.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-10-31, 03:03   #62
frmky
 
frmky's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
So Cal

22×33×19 Posts
Default

I canceled the WUs on the server. When they next connect to the server, those WUs will be canceled locally.
frmky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-11-01, 16:24   #63
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

22·3·5·53 Posts
Default 9p8_305 factored

Code:
p86 factor: 19652183625441417364455036701749227215746653115421156493850613911841785292330548132931
p100 factor: 7074552900597229236192695114691356909702349100114562034686087633821472243730999357334985850406421321
207M unique relations built a 12.0M matrix using TD=120. (124 failed)
Solve time about 114 hours. (-t 3)

Log at: https://pastebin.com/VEnWGs4g
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-11-01, 17:24   #64
chris2be8
 
chris2be8's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

194610 Posts
Default

f57_142p1_2nd_try has built a matrix. About 66 hours remain so I should have a result on Wednesday.

Chris
chris2be8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-11-02, 19:11   #65
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

1,597 Posts
Default

Taking 7p4_302.
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-11-04, 16:41   #66
chris2be8
 
chris2be8's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

36328 Posts
Default

f57_142p1_2nd_try is done:
Code:
p63 factor: 167552745124874086437111677817378592021218235263605211795460501
p127 factor: 1418723206877549581259386845930718578719177439135569583383952710748369719861830037858937637046396185716684523600568438957459509
Log at https://pastebin.com/2BjBtKCn

Reported to factordb and http://myfactors.mooo.com/

And f62_139m1 has built a matrix. About 69 hours remain so I should have a result on Saturday.

Chris
chris2be8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2020 14e post processing reservations and results swellman NFS@Home 518 2020-11-30 22:22
2020 15e post processing reservations and results swellman NFS@Home 92 2020-11-28 23:36
2019 14e post processing reservations and results swellman NFS@Home 862 2019-12-31 10:51
2018 15e post-processing reservations and results fivemack NFS@Home 221 2019-01-04 13:08
2018 14e post processing reservations and results pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 551 2019-01-04 13:06

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:24.

Wed Dec 2 09:24:19 UTC 2020 up 83 days, 6:35, 1 user, load averages: 1.28, 1.36, 1.39

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.