mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2021-02-06, 18:48   #1
simon389
 
Aug 2013

3·29 Posts
Default Threadripper Pro will have 8-channel memory

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y2_Tc-sEMK8
Will this be the new amazing Prime95 PRP CPU? Have there been any P95 benchmarks? It seems like memory bandwidth has been the main bottleneck.

Last fiddled with by simon389 on 2021-02-06 at 18:49
simon389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-06, 20:41   #2
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

587610 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon389 View Post
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y2_Tc-sEMK8
Will this be the new amazing Prime95 PRP CPU? Have there been any P95 benchmarks? It seems like memory bandwidth has been the main bottleneck.
Memory bandwidth is often the issue. More recently some cpus have had enough L3 cache that memory won't be needed. This threadripper is likely to be one of them.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-10, 04:48   #3
simon389
 
Aug 2013

8710 Posts
Default

Ok so will the Pro model of Threadripper with its 8 channel RAM actually be faster than regular Threadripper with its 4-channel RAM?
simon389 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-10, 04:51   #4
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

3·29·71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon389 View Post
Ok so will the Pro model of Threadripper with its 8 channel RAM actually be faster than regular Threadripper with its 4-channel RAM?
Maybe. Maybe not. That depends upon what program(s) you are running. The only way to know is to test it.
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-02-10, 10:13   #5
M344587487
 
M344587487's Avatar
 
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017

3·269 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
Memory bandwidth is often the issue. More recently some cpus have had enough L3 cache that memory won't be needed. This threadripper is likely to be one of them.
For small FFT's it's definitely true that memory bandwidth is irrelevant, for large FFT's memory bandwidth should come into play as you probably want to increase worker count to decrease CCX-to-CCX communication, 16 discrete chunks of L3 is not ideal and needs to be worked around. The larger the FFT the more likely memory bandwidth comes into play, but as long as you tune to the point that CCX comm, cache contention, memory bandwidth and compute are in check you should be in the ballpark of optimal.
M344587487 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Threadripper 3990X vs. Threadripper 3970X Viliam Furik Hardware 21 2020-04-19 08:24
Quad Channel DDR4 vs Dual Channel DDR4 ATH Hardware 17 2015-10-27 21:06
Single vs Dual channel memory TObject Hardware 5 2014-12-24 05:58
Importance of dual channel memory for dual core processors patrik Hardware 3 2007-01-07 09:26
Cache, dual channel memory and Mprime performance optim Hardware 4 2004-06-25 03:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 17:37.

Tue Jun 22 17:37:47 UTC 2021 up 25 days, 15:25, 0 users, load averages: 1.21, 1.39, 1.52

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.