 mersenneforum.org > Math Modified fermat's last theorem
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  2007-05-11, 23:42 #1 Citrix   Jun 2003 2·811 Posts Modified fermat's last theorem I found this problem on a website (lost link to the website). The problem asks for solutions of x^x*y^y=z^z Are any solutions possible? If possible I think x and y have to be smooth. Any thoughts on how to approach this? Last fiddled with by Citrix on 2007-05-11 at 23:43   2007-05-12, 03:34   #2
wblipp

"William"
May 2003
Near Grandkid

53×19 Posts Quote:
 Originally Posted by Citrix The problem asks for solutions of x^x*y^y=z^z Are any solutions possible?
I suppose you want to exclude x=1 and the symmetric y=1?   2007-05-12, 15:05 #3 Citrix   Jun 2003 2×811 Posts yes   2007-05-15, 06:58 #4 nibble4bits   Nov 2005 B616 Posts It almost has to involve logorythms but I may be wrong in this intuition. :LOL: Likely! Did you mean (x^x)*(y^y)=z^z? Or x^(x(y^y))=z^z? Last fiddled with by nibble4bits on 2007-05-15 at 06:59   2007-05-15, 16:56   #5
victor

Oct 2005
Fribourg, CH

22×32×7 Posts Quote:
 Originally Posted by nibble4bits It almost has to involve logorythms but I may be wrong in this intuition. :LOL: Likely! Did you mean (x^x)*(y^y)=z^z? Or x^(x(y^y))=z^z?
He meant x^x*y^y=z^z
And this means (x^x)*(y^y)=z^z

I think we can conjecture there is no integer solution.

btw, I tested for each   2007-05-15, 21:31   #6
R.D. Silverman

"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston

2×3,779 Posts Quote:
 Originally Posted by victor He meant x^x*y^y=z^z And this means (x^x)*(y^y)=z^z I think we can conjecture there is no integer solution. btw, I tested for each
(1) This conjecture can not be considered as even remotely related to FLT.
FLT is a conjecture about algebraic (abelian) varieties. This is not one.

(2) Proving that this equation has no solution is easy. Hint: if a prime
divides the right side count how many times that it does. It must
divide the left side the same number of time.

This leads to a simple additive relation between x,y, and z. Which then   2007-05-15, 22:11 #7 victor   Oct 2005 Fribourg, CH 22·32·7 Posts 1) I didn't said it was related to FLT 2) Thanks a lot for these specifications, really interresting    2007-05-16, 04:53 #8 Citrix   Jun 2003 162210 Posts Doesn't make a difference if it is related to FLT or not. lets say for a given prime p, such that x=p^l*a and y=p^m*b and z=p^n*c we have l*x+m*y=n*z How does one proceed from here?   2007-05-16, 09:31   #9
akruppa

"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria

2,467 Posts Quote:
 Originally Posted by victor 1) I didn't said it was related to FLT
No, but Citrix originally did. See thread title. Alex   2007-05-16, 09:34   #10
R.D. Silverman

"Bob Silverman"
Nov 2003
North of Boston

2·3,779 Posts Quote:
 Originally Posted by Citrix Doesn't make a difference if it is related to FLT or not. lets say for a given prime p, such that x=p^l*a and y=p^m*b and z=p^n*c we have l*x+m*y=n*z How does one proceed from here?

Select a prime that only divides z to the first power.   2007-05-16, 09:51   #11
Citrix

Jun 2003

162210 Posts Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman Select a prime that only divides z to the first power.
How does this help? Sorry, I can't see the solution. If a prime divides Z, it must be a factor of x or y? So if n>0 then m or l must be >0 or =n.

Alex: the website called it modified LFT (not me)   Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 12 2017-12-25 05:43 devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 14 2017-11-12 20:04 devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 1 2017-07-07 13:56 devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 0 2017-06-24 12:11 devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 2 2017-06-23 04:39

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:41.

Thu Jun 8 15:41:13 UTC 2023 up 294 days, 13:09, 0 users, load averages: 1.17, 1.04, 1.02