Fast Breeding (guru management)

VictordeHolland · 2015-01-09, 00:48

These two Fibonacci numbers were suggested by Batalov a few months ago, they can still be sieved:

Fib(1405) C235
x^4+3x^2+1
x-L281
SNFS difficulty = 234.6

Fib(1415) C236
x^4+3x^2+1
x-L283
SNFS difficulty = 236.2

Both have survived enough ECM (17769 curves @110M by B.Kelly).

frmky · 2015-01-09, 01:58

Those are both on my list of potential candidates. I just skipped them for now since I haven't looked at the parameters for a quartic in a while. As quartics, I think they are more appropriate for 15e.

frmky · 2015-01-10, 04:18

Looking at the list of remaining Fib/Luc numbers in range of 15e, after the current batch we have 1 quintic (L1397), 16 quartics (F1405, F1415, and 14 Lucas numbers from L2645A to L2855A/B), and 7 GNFS (F2145, F2163, F1585, L2037, L1502, L1583, and L1541). I'll need to look up those quartic parameters again soon.

fivemack · 2015-01-16, 23:49

Does

Code:

C170_5748_1537	Aliquot	GNFS(170)	32	20-120 M	42.17 %	3371	2534	0	0	...	Tom Womack

(lots of blocks pending and none completed)

mean I've got the polynomial file somehow wrong? Could someone competent have a look at it?

pinhodecarlos · 2015-01-17, 00:35

I see a lot of blocks completed but I don't see on the server where the relations are saved. C170_5748_1537 folder is empty.

RichD · 2015-01-17, 14:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by fivemack

(lots of blocks pending and none completed)

Same thing with lasieved.

Top entry sitting at 201M completed and 32M est. pending for nearly a day.
Number of pending dropped from over 500 to 300 with no change in the relations count.

debrouxl · 2015-01-17, 14:32

The update script probably went belly-up in a persistent way again. This occurs once in a while.

fivemack · 2015-01-23, 19:37

The statistics issue appears to have been resolved. I have added a few more Q to some of the 14e numbers, but GW_7_288 is ready for linear algebra now.

debrouxl · 2015-01-27, 09:54

The 14e queue is currently low, so I've queued a relatively easy (SNFS 233) near-repdigit number, though not started it yet.

Rich Dickerson recently suggested the 7103^61-1 and 7331^61-1 OP numbers, SNFS difficulty 235, on which at least 10K curves at B1=43e6 were performed. I'm hereby reserving both. It's been a while since we did OP numbers

We still have several GCW numbers suitable for 14e, don't we ?

fivemack · 2015-01-27, 10:17

I'm not anticipating queuing anything for a while: my polynomial-selection resources are all devoted to 114!+1 and it will be a week or so before I have a polynomial. It looks as if yoyo@home has thoroughly ECMed several GCW numbers, I'll leave the choice and enqueuing for those up to xilman.

I have asked yoyo@home to do substantial ECM on the three XYYXF C17x cofactors with highest SNFS:GNFS difficulty ratio, and will feed those (at least one to 14e, probably two, possibly three) once the ECM is done and I've found a polynomial.

fivemack · 2015-01-29, 00:31

I've put the two mentioned OPN numbers on; it would be good if xilman or someone could put up some more GCW, otherwise the queue will drain quite fast.

I had a look at GC_11_239, but it's too big for 14e.

2015-01-09, 00:48	#1
VictordeHolland "Victor de Hollander" Aug 2011 the Netherlands 1179₁₀ Posts	Fast Breeding (guru management) These two Fibonacci numbers were suggested by Batalov a few months ago, they can still be sieved: Fib(1405) C235 x^4+3x^2+1 x-L281 SNFS difficulty = 234.6 Fib(1415) C236 x^4+3x^2+1 x-L283 SNFS difficulty = 236.2 Both have survived enough ECM (17769 curves @110M by B.Kelly). Last fiddled with by VictordeHolland on 2015-01-09 at 00:53

2015-01-09, 01:58	#2
frmky Jul 2003 So Cal 5127₈ Posts	Those are both on my list of potential candidates. I just skipped them for now since I haven't looked at the parameters for a quartic in a while. As quartics, I think they are more appropriate for 15e. Last fiddled with by frmky on 2015-01-09 at 01:59

2015-01-16, 23:49	#4
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 1100100110110₂ Posts	A bit worried Does Code: C170_5748_1537 Aliquot GNFS(170) 32 20-120 M 42.17 % 3371 2534 0 0 ... Tom Womack (lots of blocks pending and none completed) mean I've got the polynomial file somehow wrong? Could someone competent have a look at it?

2015-01-17, 00:35	#5
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 5·1,033 Posts	I see a lot of blocks completed but I don't see on the server where the relations are saved. C170_5748_1537 folder is empty. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2015-01-17 at 00:38

2015-01-27, 09:54	#9
debrouxl Sep 2009 3D4₁₆ Posts	Feeding the Beast (queue management) The 14e queue is currently low, so I've queued a relatively easy (SNFS 233) near-repdigit number, though not started it yet. Rich Dickerson recently suggested the 7103^61-1 and 7331^61-1 OP numbers, SNFS difficulty 235, on which at least 10K curves at B1=43e6 were performed. I'm hereby reserving both. It's been a while since we did OP numbers We still have several GCW numbers suitable for 14e, don't we ?

2015-01-10, 04:18	#3
frmky Jul 2003 So Cal 5127₈ Posts	Looking at the list of remaining Fib/Luc numbers in range of 15e, after the current batch we have 1 quintic (L1397), 16 quartics (F1405, F1415, and 14 Lucas numbers from L2645A to L2855A/B), and 7 GNFS (F2145, F2163, F1585, L2037, L1502, L1583, and L1541). I'll need to look up those quartic parameters again soon.

2015-01-17, 14:32	#7
debrouxl Sep 2009 2²·5·7² Posts	The update script probably went belly-up in a persistent way again. This occurs once in a while.

2015-01-23, 19:37	#8
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 6454₁₀ Posts	The statistics issue appears to have been resolved. I have added a few more Q to some of the 14e numbers, but GW_7_288 is ready for linear algebra now.

2015-01-27, 10:17	#10
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 1100100110110₂ Posts	I'm not anticipating queuing anything for a while: my polynomial-selection resources are all devoted to 114!+1 and it will be a week or so before I have a polynomial. It looks as if yoyo@home has thoroughly ECMed several GCW numbers, I'll leave the choice and enqueuing for those up to xilman. I have asked yoyo@home to do substantial ECM on the three XYYXF C17x cofactors with highest SNFS:GNFS difficulty ratio, and will feed those (at least one to 14e, probably two, possibly three) once the ECM is done and I've found a polynomial.

2015-01-29, 00:31	#11
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2×7×461 Posts	I've put the two mentioned OPN numbers on; it would be good if xilman or someone could put up some more GCW, otherwise the queue will drain quite fast. I had a look at GC_11_239, but it's too big for 14e.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
System management notes	kriesel	kriesel	10	2021-09-01 15:56
Improving the queue management.	debrouxl	NFS@Home	10	2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management	ewmayer	Software	3	2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!)	jasong	jasong	35	2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings	PrimeCroat	Hardware	3	2004-02-17 19:11