mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-07-06, 10:57   #1
panic
 
Jul 2009
UK

316 Posts
Default I think it's gonna be a long, long time

Hey guys,

It's my first time on the forum, and i'm glad to be part of GIMPS I've been going for about 2 weeks and I used to a few years back aswell.

I've very recently (about 5 minutes ago) got a Pentium III @ 500MHz doing LL (100) "first-time" tests, and although already having a vague knowledge of how incredibly long it takes to do them, I was shocked to be told that it would take 626 days!

I don't know whether it's worth the time and effort to let it carry on working, since it said that the exponent might be re-assigned after a year anyway. Any advice?

Cheers
panic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-06, 12:18   #2
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

1102210 Posts
Default

My advice is to change the work type for that machine to TF-LMH.

Trial Factoring assignments are much shorter in duration. And those in the higher ranges (commonly known as LMH) are even faster and more well suited to your machine.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-06, 12:33   #3
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

11110000011002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by panic View Post
I was shocked to be told that it would take 626 days!

I don't know whether it's worth the time and effort to let it carry on working, since it said that the exponent might be re-assigned after a year anyway. Any advice?
Be sure to send in regular progress reports. Exponents likely to be reassigned are those showing no recent progress.
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-06, 13:14   #4
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2×3×11×167 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehead View Post
Be sure to send in regular progress reports. Exponents likely to be reassigned are those showing no recent progress.
And perform a back-up of the directory about once a month.

Also, a double check would be faster, as it is a smaller number.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-06, 13:29   #5
panic
 
Jul 2009
UK

38 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
My advice is to change the work type for that machine to TF-LMH.

Trial Factoring assignments are much shorter in duration. And those in the higher ranges (commonly known as LMH) are even faster and more well suited to your machine.
Ah yeah thanks, i'm not prepared to wait nearly 2 years for a result! A lot of Elton John to listen to if I let it carry on!

Cheers
panic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-06, 15:27   #6
pegaso56
 
pegaso56's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
Rosario, Argentina

43 Posts
Default old PIII

Hi. May be a good idea to change to Linux, use mprime instead of prime95 in order to optimize cpu resources, and if you have enough memory you could try doing p-1.
Regards, Carlos
pegaso56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-06, 20:31   #7
panic
 
Jul 2009
UK

38 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pegaso56 View Post
Hi. May be a good idea to change to Linux, use mprime instead of prime95 in order to optimize cpu resources, and if you have enough memory you could try doing p-1.
Regards, Carlos
Coincidentally I already was using linux 32-bit mprime with nothing else running I've now assigned P-1 factoring.

Cheers
panic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-07, 03:35   #8
jasong
 
jasong's Avatar
 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005

3·7·167 Posts
Default

I forget how much power those P3s use, but purely from an electrical cost perspective you might do pretty well with the P3. There was someone a good while back who put a bunch of P3 stuff together, about a kilowatt of power draw, I think. That person did really well from a total cost perspective and it might still be true for P3s.

You can do whatever you want, I'm just killing time with this post. :)
jasong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-07-07, 16:50   #9
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

33·227 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasong View Post
I forget how much power those P3s use, but purely from an electrical cost perspective you might do pretty well with the P3. There was someone a good while back who put a bunch of P3 stuff together, about a kilowatt of power draw, I think. That person did really well from a total cost perspective and it might still be true for P3s.

You can do whatever you want, I'm just killing time with this post. :)
i would be surprised if a kilowatt-worth of p3s would outdo one cheap Q6600
plus a Q6600 would use maybe a quarter of the power and possibly cost less than getting a lot of p3 parts together
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-09-11, 05:11   #10
Reed_Young
 
Reed_Young's Avatar
 
"Reed Young"
Sep 2009
Oregon

2D16 Posts
Default A kilowatt worth of P3's is very interesting

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasong View Post
I forget how much power those P3s use, but purely from an electrical cost perspective you might do pretty well with the P3. There was someone a good while back who put a bunch of P3 stuff together, about a kilowatt of power draw, I think. That person did really well from a total cost perspective and it might still be true for P3s.

You can do whatever you want, I'm just killing time with this post. :)
Combined with another suggestion I read earlier today, booting Linux without a hard drive using NFS and PXE, I can believe somebody got enough P3 processors to do more with a kilowatt than with one bleeding-edge standalone system that also requires one kilowatt. If you can find that story about the P3s I'd read it.

Reed Young
Reed_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long time P95 user now experiencing errors with new version. Sugam Software 6 2016-03-24 10:06
Will running prime95 for long time harm CPU? dabaichi Hardware 21 2011-12-25 06:29
Using long long's in Mingw with 32-bit Windows XP grandpascorpion Programming 7 2009-10-04 12:13
How long is too long? schickel Lounge 2 2009-02-22 12:31
Too long time to work ... ??? Joël Harismendy Software 18 2005-05-16 15:05

All times are UTC. The time now is 01:34.


Sun Jun 4 01:34:55 UTC 2023 up 289 days, 23:03, 0 users, load averages: 0.77, 0.79, 0.90

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔