Vapochill LS

georgekh · 2005-04-16, 21:48

hey everyone!!! i just bought a Vapochill LS and i will be cranking up the speed out of my 3.2c to around 4.5ghz

and i will post some benchmarks!!!!

I cant wait, if anyone else has some extreme overclocks or extreme cooling then please let us know.

PS: cant wait to

this things muscle!!!

georgekh · 2005-04-17, 19:17

also, since i allready have a 3.2 northwood, i'm getting a 3.2 prescott and i'm having trouble deciding which one i should stick to my vapochill, i want to know which one is better for prime95, the 3.2 northwood overclocked or prescott overclocked. thanks

moo · 2005-04-17, 22:02

northwood prescot is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.

lycorn · 2005-04-17, 23:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by moo

northwood prescot is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.

I think you mean simply "prescott", the core that replaced northwood...
In fact Prescott is good to warm your room in winter, and Northwood is definitely better for Prime95.
I have a 3,2GHz Northwood overclocked to 3.5 GHz (air cooled) and I would really like to know how far you will be able to go with Vapochill. Don´t forget that for really "serious" OC you should also keep an eye on the memories and the chipset, as they are also prone to heat a lot.

moo · 2005-04-18, 21:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycorn

I think you mean simply "prescott", the core that replaced northwood...
In fact Prescott is good to warm your room in winter, and Northwood is definitely better for Prime95.
I have a 3,2GHz Northwood overclocked to 3.5 GHz (air cooled) and I would really like to know how far you will be able to go with Vapochill. Don´t forget that for really "serious" OC you should also keep an eye on the memories and the chipset, as they are also prone to heat a lot.

i know that i forgot a , and the and a and

northwood, the prescot is a waste of cooling and power and should have never become avaible to public.
Yesterday 02:17 PM

Peter Nelson · 2005-04-19, 12:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by moo

i know that i forgot a , and the and a and

northwood, the prescot is a waste of cooling and power and should have never become avaible to public.
Yesterday 02:17 PM

I understood what you meant, moo, although the punctuation helps!

Northwoods are better than Prescott in most ways if you have a choice. eg for throughput in P95 at identical speeds.

If I had such a cooler I would probably stick it on the northwood too.

georgekh · 2005-04-20, 02:02

ok i think i'll stick with the NW then and i'll stick the prescott in my older machine

lycorn · 2005-05-02, 12:55

Any benchies yet?

georgekh · 2005-05-07, 04:31

i will post benchies for a 3.2 or a 3.4 Northwood in a bout a few weeks.

georgekh · 2005-06-01, 15:04

my project has been set back a few weeks because my video card is not in stock right now but i decided finally to go for another 3.2c and it turns out that i got a 30 capacitor one so from what i hear its supposedly supposed to be an EE but something went wrong so they jsut sold it as a northwood so what this means that it might be a gallatin core but i doubt it but these chips overclock much better then the normal northwoods!!!!

georgekh · 2005-06-29, 15:22

Here is my unoverclocked bench mark

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3198.55 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 11.641 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 13.863 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 15.818 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 18.956 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.070 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 27.199 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 30.467 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 40.081 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 49.231 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 58.714 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 66.277 ms.

Now here is a benchmark from my older overclock

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 3647.76 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 10.021 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 11.924 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 13.648 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 16.404 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 19.984 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.556 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.338 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 34.603 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 42.372 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 50.425 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 57.149 ms.

Now here is my benchmark from my new overclock using my Vapochill

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz
CPU speed: 4000.24 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 8.993 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 10.709 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 12.282 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 14.588 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 17.823 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 21.062 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 23.482 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 30.757 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 37.927 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 45.061 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 50.789 ms.

2005-04-16, 21:48	#1
georgekh Oct 2004 2×3³ Posts	Vapochill LS hey everyone!!! i just bought a Vapochill LS and i will be cranking up the speed out of my 3.2c to around 4.5ghz and i will post some benchmarks!!!! I cant wait, if anyone else has some extreme overclocks or extreme cooling then please let us know. PS: cant wait to this things muscle!!!

2005-04-17, 19:17	#2
georgekh Oct 2004 2·3³ Posts	also, since i allready have a 3.2 northwood, i'm getting a 3.2 prescott and i'm having trouble deciding which one i should stick to my vapochill, i want to know which one is better for prime95, the 3.2 northwood overclocked or prescott overclocked. thanks

2005-04-17, 22:02	#3
moo Jul 2004 Nowhere 329₁₆ Posts	northwood prescot is a waste of cooling power and should have never become avaible to public.

2005-04-20, 02:02	#7
georgekh Oct 2004 2·3³ Posts	ok i think i'll stick with the NW then and i'll stick the prescott in my older machine

2005-05-02, 12:55	#8
lycorn "GIMFS" Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 1536₁₀ Posts	Any benchies yet?

2005-05-07, 04:31	#9
georgekh Oct 2004 66₈ Posts	i will post benchies for a 3.2 or a 3.4 Northwood in a bout a few weeks.

2005-06-01, 15:04	#10
georgekh Oct 2004 66₈ Posts	my project has been set back a few weeks because my video card is not in stock right now but i decided finally to go for another 3.2c and it turns out that i got a 30 capacitor one so from what i hear its supposedly supposed to be an EE but something went wrong so they jsut sold it as a northwood so what this means that it might be a gallatin core but i doubt it but these chips overclock much better then the normal northwoods!!!!

2005-06-29, 15:22	#11
georgekh Oct 2004 2×3³ Posts	Here is my unoverclocked bench mark Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz CPU speed: 3198.55 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 11.641 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 13.863 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 15.818 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 18.956 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.070 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 27.199 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 30.467 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 40.081 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 49.231 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 58.714 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 66.277 ms. Now here is a benchmark from my older overclock Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz CPU speed: 3647.76 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 10.021 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 11.924 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 13.648 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 16.404 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 19.984 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 23.556 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 26.338 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 34.603 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 42.372 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 50.425 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 57.149 ms. Now here is my benchmark from my new overclock using my Vapochill Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz CPU speed: 4000.24 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 8.993 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 10.709 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 12.282 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 14.588 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 17.823 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 21.062 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 23.482 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 30.757 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 37.927 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 45.061 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 50.789 ms.