20210606, 06:40  #177  
May 2007
Kansas; USA
295E_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Another area to sieve would be bases with 11 or 12 k's remaining at n=100K. You could sieve those for n=100K500K. If there are too few of those you could go up to <= 15 k's remaining at n=100K. Eventually those will make their way onto the project goals list in future years. Thanks! Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20210606 at 06:41 

20210606, 11:21  #178  
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
10111001111_{2} Posts 
Quote:
t16_b117_k1474.npg t16_b257_k40.npg t16_b317_k44.npg t16_b318_k89.npg t16_b430_k15321.npg t16_b497_k8.npg t16_b789_k96.npg t16_b883_k66.npg Sent for sieving! 

20210613, 06:20  #179 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×3×5×353 Posts 
I have added R578 to n=200K to the recommended list. This base is lowweight and is the lowest "relative difficulty" base that we have that is not in the 2021 goals. Therefore it can easily be searched higher.
I am not adding it to the 2021 project goals. Pepi, please have this base sieved by Yoyo to n=500K when you get a chance. Thanks. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20210613 at 06:25 
20210615, 11:17  #180  
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
1,487 Posts 
Quote:
Noticed! I will sent that in next few days! 

20210807, 20:07  #181 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×3×5×353 Posts 
I have added several bases to the recommended list that have <=5 k's remaining and are tested to n<300K. All except one currently have sieve files. The one that doesn't is currently being sieved.
These bases are not on our goals list for 2021 but are next in line based on # of k's remaining and test depth. 
20210819, 02:42  #182 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×3×5×353 Posts 
I have added a bunch of bases with 11 k's remaining with a recommended search of n=100K300K. All either have fully sieved files for them or are currently being sieved.
These should be considered lower priority than the bases with <=7 k's remaining for n=200K300K. Looking way ahead, the eventual objective would be to have all bases with <= 10 k's remaining (possibly <= 12 k's) tested to n=300K by sometime in 2022. We will no longer be suggesting testing of bases for "only" n=100K200K. Effectively this is getting merged with the separate effort of testing bases for n=200K300K. 
20210907, 22:41  #183 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
24536_{8} Posts 
I have added some recommendations for 1k and 2k bases in the first post. Everything there should keep us busy for a year or more. :)

20211113, 06:48  #184 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2×3×5×353 Posts 
R912 and R932 now have sieve files. :)

20211124, 05:47  #185 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
2·3·5·353 Posts 
I have added bases with 12 k's remaining at n<300K as well as 1k bases 500600 at n<600K to the recommended lists. :)
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20211201 at 11:01 
20211220, 05:51  #186 
May 2007
Kansas; USA
24536_{8} Posts 
Recommended bases to n=10K, n=25K, and 13k bases to n=300K have been added to the 1st post of this thread.
Note that bases with partially sieved files will have a "p" by the base. Of course as usual the bases with fully sieved files will have a "*". These will likely coincide with many of our 2022 goals. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 20211220 at 05:54 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Cunningham ECM efforts  pinhodecarlos  Cunningham Tables  7  20171221 13:29 
Doublecheck efforts; S66/S79 to start with  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  16  20140807 02:11 
ECM efforts mistake?  10metreh  mersennewiki  1  20081228 13:31 
Recommended TF bit levels for M(>10^8)  NBtarheel_33  Math  19  20081103 17:19 
ECM Efforts  R.D. Silverman  Factoring  63  20050624 13:41 