20180302, 19:10  #12 
Feb 2018
2^{2}·3^{2} Posts 
Up to now with all the notation in the world, everybody has failed. I use numbers and ×, , +, ÷ and succeed. Who wins? The fact that the 'private language' brigade doesn't like it, l think is quite sad.

20180302, 19:29  #13 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
8,369 Posts 
It's not private it's notation is a product is a sum. If you know pedmas you know part of math language ( more generally convention). () Is used for functions and tup!es {} are for sets. Also plain language doesn't always convert well to math. Verbosity isn't a friend in communication usually.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 20180302 at 19:30 
20180302, 19:48  #14  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
1000101110101_{2} Posts 
Quote:
Your tirade against standard math language is foolish; using more English and less math notation doesn't make your ideas new, merely unclear. 

20180303, 04:41  #15 
Jun 2003
17·281 Posts 

20180303, 12:42  #16  
Feb 2018
44_{8} Posts 
Quote:
If l had said, "1,000,000 pounds to anyone who understands what is being said here", there would be lots of correct answers. What l wrote originally, although written in basic language, serves the purpose just fine to get the point across. The answer is correct. That is what matters! Anybody's refusal to accept substance over style is as l said, quite sad. What is difficult to understand from,.... primes from 7 up to 121(7 to 113) each minus 1), multiplied together,...divided by primes from 7 up to 121(7 to 113)...× (121squared minus1)/30,...that produces 210.02917, which is the number of primes on (1+n30) or 1, 31, 61, 91 etc. OR 6/7 × 10/11 × 12/13.......× (prime(n)minus 1)/prime(n) × (121squared minus 1)/30. Prime(n) equals prime before 121. There is NOTHING wrong at all. And if a person cannot understand what is being said, which they could but don't want to, then that is sad. 

20180303, 12:43  #17 
Feb 2018
44_{8} Posts 
It has occurred, but l know that is not true. Desire, or the lack of, is the problem.

20180303, 16:18  #18 
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
13·367 Posts 

20180303, 20:15  #19 
Feb 2018
44_{8} Posts 

20180303, 22:15  #20  
Aug 2006
2×2,969 Posts 
Quote:


20180303, 22:44  #21 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
8,369 Posts 
None lack a desire for math, some may have a desire towards concise, precise, and accurate math though. Your lack of desire to put it in that form may be a hurdle.
Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 20180303 at 22:48 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Prime counting function records  D. B. Staple  Computer Science & Computational Number Theory  49  20201106 22:02 
New confirmed pi(10^27), pi(10^28) prime counting function records  kwalisch  Computer Science & Computational Number Theory  34  20201029 10:04 
Counting Goldbach Prime Pairs Up To...  Steve One  Miscellaneous Math  8  20180306 19:20 
Fourier Series for Prime Number Counting Functions  SteveC  Analysis & Analytic Number Theory  10  20161014 21:48 
Legendre's prime counting function  pbewig  Information & Answers  0  20110714 00:47 