![]() |
![]() |
#2586 |
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
41718 Posts |
![]()
RX 570. Probably can get a little more out of it if I tune for this FFT size...
Code:
2020-11-09 06:31:21 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-16-g1a50f11 2020-11-09 06:31:21 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-16-g1a50f11 2020-11-09 06:31:21 Note: not found 'config.txt' 2020-11-09 06:31:21 config: -prp 77936867 2020-11-09 06:31:21 device 0, unique id '' 2020-11-09 06:31:22 Ellesmere-0 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw) 2020-11-09 06:31:22 Ellesmere-0 77936867 OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DAMDGPU=1 -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0.33644726404543274 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0.25174750481886216 -DIWEIGHTS={0,-0.25174750481886216,-0.44011820345520131,-0.16213409745771243,-0.37306474779553728,-0.061788266441989627,-0.29798072935699788,-0.47471232907613115,-0.21390437908665341,-0.41180199020062258,-0.11975874301407295,-0.3413572830988989,-0.014337887291734644,-0.26247586476052853,-0.44814572555075455,-0.17414732433395128,} -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only " 2020-11-09 06:31:22 Ellesmere-0 77936867 ASM compilation failed, retrying compilation using NO_ASM 2020-11-09 06:31:25 Ellesmere-0 77936867 OpenCL compilation in 3.29 s 2020-11-09 06:31:25 Ellesmere-0 77936867 maxAlloc: 0.0 GB 2020-11-09 06:31:25 Ellesmere-0 77936867 You should use -maxAlloc if your GPU has more than 4GB memory. See help '-h' 2020-11-09 06:31:25 Ellesmere-0 77936867 P1(0) 0 bits 2020-11-09 06:31:27 Ellesmere-0 77936867 OK 800 on-load: blockSize 400, 1579c241dc63eca6 2020-11-09 06:31:27 Ellesmere-0 77936867 validating proof residues for power 8 2020-11-09 06:31:27 Ellesmere-0 77936867 Proof using power 8 2020-11-09 06:31:31 Ellesmere-0 77936867 OK 1600 0.00% 0f62a1fcc1c78fe9 3389 us/it + check 1.44s + save 0.20s; ETA 3d 01:22 2020-11-09 06:32:00 Ellesmere-0 77936867 10000 0.01% fc4f135f7cf4ad29 3384 us/it 2020-11-09 06:32:34 Ellesmere-0 77936867 20000 0.03% 3cd1bd9d5e09cbc5 3385 us/it 2020-11-09 06:33:07 Ellesmere-0 77936867 30000 0.04% c4e0ff35e3290d98 3385 us/it 2020-11-09 06:33:41 Ellesmere-0 77936867 40000 0.05% dffe1b1b0d748128 3386 us/it 2020-11-09 06:34:15 Ellesmere-0 77936867 50000 0.06% 52e286945371ed29 3385 us/it 2020-11-09 06:34:49 Ellesmere-0 77936867 60000 0.08% 0945da4dc08bdd95 3385 us/it ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2587 | |
Aug 2020
1308 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Here is an interesting comparison. See the attached picture. Blue Text, Configuration 1 - Deskmini A300, 3200G, 16GB DDR-4 SO-DIMM, SSD Purple Text, Configuration 2 - B450-HDV V4.0, 3200G, 16GB DDR-4 DIMM, SSD I am not finished because I still need to get mfakto and gpuowl working on linux to complete the comparison table but I am making progress. Last fiddled with by DrobinsonPE on 2020-11-09 at 15:43 Reason: grammar and formatting |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2588 |
Jul 2009
Germany
10438 Posts |
![]()
Thx, read this post
https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...3&postcount=19 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2589 | |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
22·5·251 Posts |
![]() Quote:
The standalone uploader worked for me in v7.0 and v7.1 which was the transition to proof v2. https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=110 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-11-09 at 21:47 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2590 | |
Feb 2016
! North_America
79 Posts |
![]()
I am getting this error: "expected maximum carry: ...", then gpuowl terminates
Code:
2020-11-09 23:38:06 config: -log 500000 -use NO_ASM -use STATS -safeMath -B1 650000 -B2 22000000 2020-11-09 23:38:06 config: 2020-11-09 23:38:06 config: 2020-11-09 23:38:06 config: 2020-11-09 23:38:06 device 0, unique id '' 2020-11-09 23:38:06 rx460 101023669 FFT: 5.50M 1K:11:256 (17.52 bpw) 2020-11-09 23:38:06 rx460 Expected maximum carry32: 32630000 2020-11-09 23:38:09 rx460 OpenCL args "-DEXP=101023669u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=11u -DPM1=1 -DCARRYM64=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xc.b9443732e4938p-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x9.1a969d46d6d3p-5 -DNO_ASM=1 -DSTATS=1 -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only " Quote:
Last fiddled with by thyw on 2020-11-09 at 22:42 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2591 |
Jul 2009
Germany
10001000112 Posts |
![]()
Did you try -cl-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only instead of
-safeMath but that's more of a case for preda to help. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2592 |
Feb 2016
! North_America
79 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2593 |
Jul 2009
Germany
10438 Posts |
![]()
Which version number of gpuowl do you use, Linux or Windows? I am convinced that someone here can help you.
Please try one of this versions Fastest Windows Version (with Proofs) https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...94&postcount=8 Linux binary version Ubuntu 18.04 https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...1&postcount=40 Last fiddled with by moebius on 2020-11-10 at 00:13 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2594 |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
22·5·251 Posts |
![]()
gpuowl version Vx.y-n? OS? system ram? I've had issues with gpuowl, cured by adding system ram in low ram systems (bumping them up toward 16GB) especially with multiple gpus.
Try dropping -use STATS, add -maxAlloc with something reasonable (AT MOST total gpu ram minus 1GB or 20% , maybe lower) Techpowerup says RX460 is a 2GB gpu. On a 2GB RX550, I get away with the following, usually, as a config.txt; -device 1 -user kriesel -cpu roa/rx550 -use NO_ASM -maxAlloc 1500 -proof 8 Sometimes not. Code:
2020-11-09 06:07:48 roa/rx550 saved 2020-11-09 06:07:48 roa/rx550 Exception gpu_bad_alloc: GPU size 46137344 2020-11-09 06:07:48 roa/rx550 waiting for background GCDs.. 2020-11-09 06:07:48 roa/rx550 Bye Code:
2020-11-09 18:12:10 gpuowl v6.11-380-g79ea0cc 2020-11-09 18:12:10 config: -device 1 -user kriesel -cpu roa/rx550 -use NO_ASM -maxAlloc 1500 -proof 8 2020-11-09 18:12:10 device 1, unique id '' 2020-11-09 18:12:10 roa/rx550 100906081 FFT: 5.50M 1K:11:256 (17.50 bpw) 2020-11-09 18:12:10 roa/rx550 Expected maximum carry32: 31AE0000 2020-11-09 18:12:13 roa/rx550 OpenCL args "-DEXP=100906081u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=11u -DPM1=1 -DAMDGPU=1 -DCARRYM64=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0xd.5c397eef9d7ep-5 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0x9.6cd7eb4f2e5fp-5 -DNO_ASM=1 -cl-unsafe-math-optimizations -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only " 2020-11-09 18:12:23 roa/rx550 OpenCL compilation in 10.49 s 2020-11-09 18:12:24 roa/rx550 100906081 P1 B1=1000000, B2=30000000; 1442134 bits; starting at 1442133 2020-11-09 18:12:24 roa/rx550 100906081 P1 1442134 100.00%; 374791 us/it; ETA 0d 00:00; 6b144dfd0aeb22d7 2020-11-09 18:12:25 roa/rx550 P-1 (B1=1000000, B2=30000000, D=30030): primes 1779361, expanded 1899017, doubles 303358 (left 1203152), singles 1172645, total 1476003 (83%) 2020-11-09 18:12:25 roa/rx550 100906081 P2 using blocks [33 - 999] to cover 1476003 primes 2020-11-09 18:12:25 roa/rx550 100906081 P2 using 15 buffers of 44.0 MB each 2020-11-09 18:14:05 roa/rx550 100906081 P1 GCD: no factor 2020-11-09 18:15:32 roa/rx550 100906081 P2 15/2880: 7596 primes; setup 1.26 s, 24.330 ms/prime A 4GB RX550 in the same system, config.txt as follows: -device 0 -user kriesel -cpu roa/rx550 -proof 8 -maxAlloc 3200 -use NO_ASM Code:
2020-11-09 09:54:05 roa/rx550 100906349 P2 54/2880: 27978 primes; setup 4.88 s, 19.821 ms/prime 2020-11-09 10:03:22 roa/rx550 100906349 P2 108/2880: 27943 primes; setup 5.14 s, 19.737 ms/prime 2020-11-09 10:12:40 roa/rx550 100906349 P2 162/2880: 28015 primes; setup 4.97 s, 19.749 ms/prime Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-11-10 at 00:39 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2595 |
Feb 2016
! North_America
1178 Posts |
![]()
gpuowl 380, wasn't aware that 364 is faster
Win 10, 3570 8gb ram rx 460 It was working for the longest time, but in the middle of a 100.7M exponent stage 2, it suddenly output this same message about the carry. Since then, tried using smaller exponent, it outputs the same error. Maxalloc, new instance, every combination of parameters... It creates a crash file in every time it errors C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive , it appears to be an 'error - modul version and modul name' It isn't in English, to be fair. Tried to downgrade my driver to the certified stable, same error 20.9.1. I think i solved it, had to specify device number (-d 1), weird, it never asked for it until now. Thanks for all the help. Last fiddled with by thyw on 2020-11-10 at 01:39 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2596 | |
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
502010 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mfakto: an OpenCL program for Mersenne prefactoring | Bdot | GPU Computing | 1668 | 2020-12-22 15:38 |
GPUOWL AMD Windows OpenCL issues | xx005fs | GpuOwl | 0 | 2019-07-26 21:37 |
Testing an expression for primality | 1260 | Software | 17 | 2015-08-28 01:35 |
Testing Mersenne cofactors for primality? | CRGreathouse | Computer Science & Computational Number Theory | 18 | 2013-06-08 19:12 |
Primality-testing program with multiple types of moduli (PFGW-related) | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2006-10-04 22:38 |